Liberal Forum

I'm just wondering why Trump had Russian IP address contact before the 2016. Election.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 2:25 pm

Dwarf,

Do you think it is even possible for you to stop lying.

My narrative stands unchallenged.  I want to see how long you will go demanding answers to questions that were already answered. 

You ain’t got ****.  My narrative is correct.
 

, a spokesperson for Joffe said he did not work for a political party and was under contract to analyze domain name system data for potential security breaches.

The Russians hacked networks, including at the White House, in 2015, before Trump became president. That led to stepped-up investigations on several fronts, involving the FBI and intelligence agencies.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:18 am

Why not just answer.....uhhh....you know, honestly? You know how you feel about answering questions.

You are quite promiscuous in your commentary about sources used by others. but you don't want to subject your choices to any scrutiny...

That is all in the hell you do is "scrutinize" others sources that does not agree with your warped leftist narrative...

Buffalo » 15 Feb 2022, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 2:39 pm

That is all in the hell you do is "scrutinize" others sources that does not agree with your warped leftist narrative...

Yup, because he is here to attack and disrupt.  

All the data was forwarded to the f.b.i. and c.i.a.

This will all come out in the wash.


The right wing Republican committee news orgs will fool the useful idiots once again.

This will all come out in the wash.


The right wing Republican committee news orgs will fool the useful idiots once again.

In a statement, a spokesperson for Mr. Joffe said that “contrary to the allegations in this recent filing,” he was apolitical, did not work for any political party, and had lawful access under a contract to work with others to analyze DNS data — including from the White House — for the purpose of hunting for security breaches or threats.



Let's just forget he was under contract to do this work for second.


And then everything fox news wanted you to think would be true.

But I digress.

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm

I'm just wondering why Trump had Russian IP address contact before the 2016. Election.

Prove it!!!  Still trying to make that false Trump/Russian connection, eh asshole?  Tr\y the many tittesd empress or her slickj willie for a Russian IP.
 

Lets pretend he wasn't under contract to look into hacking by the Russian for a second.


Then we could masturbate on this all day.

I mean he turned alot of  info to the CIA and the FBI. So let's see what he released to those agencies.

Seeings as though he was under contract to look at the white house servers and such.

Can't really call that spying.

Can you?
 

Oh don't get me wrong the fox news reporting looks really bad.

And it's on purpose.

Ahhhh yeah he was paid to look into Russian hacking. So yeah he was paid by the government and was apolitical.

They spied on a presidential campaign,” Jordan said. “That’s as wrong as it gets.”

Trump and Republicans have said for years that they believe the Clinton campaign tried to smear the former president by suggesting he had questionable ties to Russia.

The former president said in a recent statement that the filing shows he was spied upon “to develop a completely fabricated connection to Russia.” He added of the unproven allegations, “in a stronger period of time in our country, this crime would have been punishable by death.”

You see if you omit the fact he was under contract by the government yeah this looks bad.

Just drop most of the facts from this story and yeah it looks bad


Good job fox news you fooled the idiots once again.

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:06 pm

You see if you omit the fact he was under contract by the government yeah this looks bad.

Just drop most of the facts from this story and yeah it looks bad

Good job fox news you fooled the idiots once again.

Let’s say the factual background is correct.  For the sake of argument.  You argument seems to be that a contractor that is maintaining a WH server can take information, give it to lawyers, and then go to another agency to report it all because they are u dear contract.

 

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 2:52 pm

I mean he turned alot of  info to the CIA and the FBI. So let's see what he released to those agencies.

Seeings as though he was under contract to look at the white house servers and such.

Can't really call that spying.

Can you?

He was a goddamn paid operative for the many titted empress' campaign, you ****, liveral idiot!!!

According to Durham, a tech executive named Rodney Joffe engaged in the information operation against Trump and his campaign. He allegedly coordinated with Michael Sussmann, a lawyer for the Clinton campaign, and his highly connected law firm, Perkins Coie, that did work for both the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party. Durham notes that Joffe also joined up with an investigative firm that Perkins Coie hired on behalf of the Clinton campaign, numerous cyber researchers, employees at various internet companies and researchers at a US-based university. He sought, he said, to please VIPs in both the Clinton campaign and Perkins Coie. 

One can only guess that he succeeded. According to Durham, Joffe “exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” and the university researchers he tapped “were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”

Joffe analyzed so-called domain name system internet traffic connected to Trump Tower and Trump’s Central Park West apartment building. Shockingly, the data effort continued after Trump was inaugurated. Joffe took advantage of his company’s “sensitive arrangement” to provide services to the executive office of the president “for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.”

Meanwhile, Sussmann used the deceptive work product from all of this sleuthing to try to convince the FBI and apparently the CIA that Trump was colluding with Russia. (Durham has indicted Sussmann for lying to the FBI to try to hide his connection to the Clinton campaign.)

Durham pointedly refers to what Sussmann was hawking as “purported data.” This operation was of a piece with the spurious Steele dossier that helped launch the FBI probe of the Trump campaign that morphed into the Mueller investigation. Or, to use Durham’s terms, purported data drove purported investigations and ungodly amounts of purported journalism, all building toward purported collusion that eventually, under the weight of facts and logic, came to absolutely nothing.

https://nypost.com/2022/02/14/turns-out ... -campaign/

Spying on a sitting President IS insurrection!!!  Everyone involved, including the many titted empress should be tried and shot!!!
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:09 pm

Let’s say the factual background is correct.  For the sake of argument.  You argument seems to be that a contractor that is maintaining a WH server can take information, give it to lawyers, and then go to another agency to report it all because they are u dear contract.

He released the information to the FBI and CIA. From what I gathered he reported lookups from the white house and trump tower to Russian IPs. 

He was under contract at the time to look at these servers. 

And I've seen no evidence he shared that with a political source. 

So Huey?????

If he was under contract to find Russian hacking and reported the thousand or so links from trump tower and Russian cell phones is that not in his contract.


Or do you know?

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:13 pm

He released the information to the FBI and CIA. From what I gathered he reported lookups from the white house and trump tower to Russian IPs. 

He was under contract at the time to look at these servers. 

And I've seen no evidence he shared that with a political source.

Tech 1 gave it to a Clinton campaign lawyer who reported it.  that is the allegation.