Liberal Forum

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:17 pm

Tech 1 gave it to a Clinton campaign lawyer who reported it.  that is the allegation.

Read the charges. 

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:18 pm

Read the charges.

I never said they were charged with that.  Go back to where I mentioned the factual background section.  He is charged with lying about his conflict of interest. Duh.
 

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm

I'm just wondering why Trump had Russian IP address contact before the 2016. Election.

Simple.  Trump had been working on a deal with Russia to build a multi-million dollar hotel in Russia, which would have been the tallest building in Moscow, and right across the street from the Kremlin.  The project was first brought up in 2005, and the Trump organization sent Russia a letter of intent in Jan. of 2016.  When Russia failed to respond in a timely manner, Trump pulled out of the deal. 

It stands to reason that there would be plenty of contact between the Trump organization and Russia over those 10+ years, but naturally, desperate libs like you will nevertheless bend over backwards trying to find something criminal about it.
 

neueregel » 15 Feb 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:49 am

Yes, I critique sources, especially those who spent years promulgating lies. These sources either didn’t do their homework or were complicit in fomenting the now proven lies. 

Now, if WaPo wants to come clean, then maybe they e turned o we a new leaf and we’ll see. Until then, they are just as bad as Putin’s Russian
propaganda.

you say "sources", but when I ask you to name them, you only volunteer one.

These sources either didn’t do their homework or were complicit in fomenting the now proven lies. 

Proven by whom?

Sources you are too ashamed to name.

Who the **** knows?


 

Needless to say, Fox News’ own coverage of what it describes as a “massive scandal” has not only been largely exaggerated but has run the gamut from disingenuous to entirely false.

Durham, who was assigned by then-Attorney General William Barr in 2019 to investigate the probe of Trump and his allies’ ties to Russia, added a pleading on Friday to his case against Michael Sussmann, a lawyer with Democratic ties. The special counsel has accused Sussmann of lying during a September 2016 meeting with the FBI over Trump’s potential Russia links.

While Durham’s filing was essentially about possible conflicts of interest, the prosecutor also “slipped in a few extra sentences that set off a furor among right-wing outlets about purported spying” on Trump, as New York Times reporter Charlie Savage explained on Monday.

Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:20 pm

Simple.  Trump had been working on a deal with Russia to build a multi-million dollar hotel in Russia, which would have been the tallest building in Moscow, and right across the street from the Kremlin.  The project was first brought up in 2005, and the Trump organization sent Russia a letter of intent in Jan. of 2016.  When Russia failed to respond in a timely manner, Trump pulled out of the deal. 

It stands to reason that there would be plenty of contact between the Trump organization and Russia over those 10+ years, but naturally, desperate libs like you will nevertheless bend over backwards trying to find something criminal about it.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexand ... tiny-deal/

golfboy » 14 Feb 2022, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 8:45 pm

lol.   Liberal historians hate Trump?
HOLD THE PRESSES!!!     

Trump's record as President was terrible. 
1) No new wars.
2) Peace in the middle east.
3) Peace with Russia, China and NKorea. 
4) Iran subdued.
5) No inflation.
6) Jobs for everyone who wanted one. 
7) Gasoline under $2. 
8) Fully stocked grocery stores. 
9) Energy independent.
10) Secure Southern border. 

Yea, everything was terrible. 

Now for Joe's list...
1) ...   ah, can't think of anything.

Let me help, pops.


 
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel.  When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client.  His billable hours got him caught.

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

This is completely wrong.

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel

No...not at all....that's straight out of Yam Daddy's sphincterface.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:34 pm

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexand ... tiny-deal/

So what's your accusation, nitwit?  Even I had forgotten about Trump hosting his Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, which is all the more reason why he would have made numerous contacts with Russian officials over so many years.

So stop trying to divert the subject away from the revelation about Hillary getting caught spying on a US president, which is a crime far worse than Watergate.

Go start your own self-serving thread like you always do and make sure to include the fact that NO CRIME HAS EVER BEEN ESTABLISHED in the hundreds of accusations made by twerps like you over the last 5 years!

And stop your diversionary trolling, ******!
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:49 pm

This is completely wrong.

No...not at all....that's straight out of Yam Daddy's sphincterface.

No, that is not wrong.  As I told you earlier go to Section 5, under factual background, of the filing.  

No, since I am old enough to remember Watergate, it is the digital equivalent of Watergate.

My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.
 

Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:50 pm

So what's your accusation, nitwit?  Even I had forgotten about Trump hosting his Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, which is all the more reason why he would have made numerous contacts with Russian officials over so many years.

So stop trying to divert the subject away from the revelation about Hillary getting caught spying on a US president, which is a crime far worse than Watergate.

Go start your own self-serving thread like you always do and make sure to include the fact that NO CRIME HAS EVER BEEN ESTABLISHED in the hundreds of accusations made by twerps like you over the last 5 years!

And stop your diversionary trolling, ******!

Zeet,

Recall how I told you it always comes down to a heap of crap in purple?
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm

No, that is not wrong.  As I told you earlier go to Section 5, under factual background, of the filing.  

No, since I am old enough to remember Watergate, it is the digital equivalent of Watergate.

My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.

Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama’s presidency.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/p ... ussia.html

No, since I am old enough to remember Watergate, it is the digital equivalent of Watergate.

No...and those are the words of Grifty, Toady.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:59 pm

Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama’s presidency.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/p ... ussia.html

No...and those are the words of Grifty, Toady.

Read sections 5,6, and 7.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm

Read sections 5,6, and 7.

I showed you.

Now you can show me.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:07 pm

I showed you.

Now you can show me.

No, you showed me a reporters opinion.  The sections I am referring to are posted on the first page of the op.  I know you are lazy so I will bump that post for you,

golfboy » 14 Feb 2022, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 8:17 pm

For what?

Cuz russia!

golfboy » 12 Feb 2022, 9:56 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2022, 9:56 pm

@Blackvegetable  

You should have read it.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm

No, you showed me a reporters opinion.  The sections I am referring to are posted on the first page of the op.  I know you are lazy so I will bump that post for you,

if you can contest the facts, do.

Don't oblige me to do it..

Cannonpointer » 15 Feb 2022, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:10 pm

Cuz russia!

Teacher offered me a mod job... he wants to steal me away from YOU.
 in his the liberal forum.. he was just kidding... that would be a DISASTER!
he needs a woman to be politcally correct.
       
i should have told him to get a black woman.... ha ha ha
i giggled all day cp!
 
 

sootedupCyndi » 15 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm

Teacher offered me a mod job... he wants to steal me away from YOU.
 in his the liberal forum.. he was just kidding... that would be a DISASTER!
he needs a woman to be politcally correct.
       
i should have told him to get a black woman.... ha ha ha
i giggled all day cp!

Did he PM you with the offer?