Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
New Durham Filing: Clinton Campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia
New Durham Filing: Clinton Campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia
By golfboy
12 Feb 2022 6:14 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
15 Feb 2022 3:48 pm
Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
So let me say this slowly so the cons can understand it.
Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
So let me say this slowly so the cons can understand it.
Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
15 Feb 2022 3:49 pm
Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
So let me say this slowly so the cons can understand it.
Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
The key part.
Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything.
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
So let me say this slowly so the cons can understand it.
Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
The key part.
Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything.
15 Feb 2022 4:00 pm
no he was just kidding! lol..
ha ha ha. I think he's looking for a women to make his politcally correct quota.
15 Feb 2022 5:48 pm
So the answer is simple! Stop trying to hijack the OP of others, and if you don't believe a statement I made is true, state it and I'll easily prove what an ignorant dolt you are once again!Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Zeet,
Recall how I told you it always comes down to a heap of crap in purple?
15 Feb 2022 6:01 pm
Zeet,Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑ So the answer is simple! Stop trying to hijack the OP of others, and if you don't believe a statement I made is true, state it and I'll easily prove what an ignorant dolt you are once again!
Limit yourself to comments the truth of which you can actually demonstrate..
That should be precious little.
15 Feb 2022 6:02 pm
triggered your ******* again....and without even trying.....like I said....you're losing it
The Majik Negro and China Joe the Demented......are you smart enough to see a pattern emerging?
15 Feb 2022 6:25 pm
triggered your ******* again....and without even trying.....like I said....you're losing itnefarious101 » 15 Feb 2022, 7:02 pm » wrote: ↑ triggered your ******* again....and without even trying.....like I said....you're losing it
The Majik Negro and China Joe the Demented......are you smart enough to see a pattern emerging?
I mean, why bother if the **** writes itself...
15 Feb 2022 6:53 pm
So then ignore me ******. That way I won't be occupying your tiny brain 24/7.Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Zeet,
Limit yourself to comments the truth of which you can actually demonstrate..
That should be precious little.
15 Feb 2022 6:55 pm
If you run your blowhard yap, I'm gonna shove a boot in it.....as I always do.Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So then ignore me ******. That way I won't be occupying your tiny brain 24/7.
15 Feb 2022 7:15 pm
Not sure he knows how.
15 Feb 2022 7:15 pm
Why did Biden show down Trump's recovery?
15 Feb 2022 7:16 pm
lol. From the guy who doesn't read his own links, and didn't realize I was quoting them.
Now, you going to name what actions Putin took, that Trump ignored - as you claimed, or not?
Because your link sure as hell didn't do it
15 Feb 2022 7:17 pm
But legal analysts have told Newsweek that the document isn't the damning evidence conservatives are touting it to be.
"It's not the smoking gun that folks are saying that it is," said Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers.
BEST OF NEWSWEEK VIA EMAIL
Email address
Or as Nick Akerman, a former Watergate prosecutor, put it: "It's absolutely nonsense."
The filing is centered on Michael Sussmann, a lawyer with ties to the Clinton campaign. Sussmann has been charged with a single count of lying to the FBI in 2016 when presenting it with documents that allegedly showed secret communications between the Trump campaign and a Russian bank.
"It's not the smoking gun that folks are saying that it is," said Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers.
BEST OF NEWSWEEK VIA EMAIL
Email address
Or as Nick Akerman, a former Watergate prosecutor, put it: "It's absolutely nonsense."
The filing is centered on Michael Sussmann, a lawyer with ties to the Clinton campaign. Sussmann has been charged with a single count of lying to the FBI in 2016 when presenting it with documents that allegedly showed secret communications between the Trump campaign and a Russian bank.
15 Feb 2022 7:19 pm
Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
So let me say this slowly so the cons can understand it.
Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”
Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,
The key part.
Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything.
Plagiarized. ^ https://smartagain.org/2022/02/15/is-jo ... -theories/
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
15 Feb 2022 7:19 pm
lol. It's cute when liberals regurgitate this nonsense, and don't know WTF is going on.Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ But legal analysts have told Newsweek that the document isn't the damning evidence conservatives are touting it to be.
"It's not the smoking gun that folks are saying that it is," said Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers.
BEST OF NEWSWEEK VIA EMAIL
Email address
Or as Nick Akerman, a former Watergate prosecutor, put it: "It's absolutely nonsense."
The filing is centered on Michael Sussmann, a lawyer with ties to the Clinton campaign. Sussmann has been charged with a single count of lying to the FBI in 2016 when presenting it with documents that allegedly showed secret communications between the Trump campaign and a Russian bank.
Why aren't you asking "who flipped" because Durham released information that ONLY came from the inside.
15 Feb 2022 7:20 pm
It's what he does. It's all he does.Zeets2 » 15 Feb 2022, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑ So the answer is simple! Stop trying to hijack the OP of others,
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
15 Feb 2022 7:20 pm
I doubt this moron even knows what a DNS server does.
I'll tell you one thing, if I'm in a DNS server, I'm in every server in your network and you can't stop me.
15 Feb 2022 7:21 pm
Duh! He let Putin invade Crimea, and didn't do ****, the coward.golfboy » 15 Feb 2022, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ lol. From the guy who doesn't read his own links, and didn't realize I was quoting them.
Now, you going to name what actions Putin took, that Trump ignored - as you claimed, or not?
Because your link sure as hell didn't do it
Edit:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
15 Feb 2022 7:22 pm
No, they actually paid people to lie, then fed those lies to the media and the CIA/FBI.AnnoyedLiberall » 15 Feb 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ To be honest, I don't completely understand what is going on here.
I don't want to listen to any news coverage about it, because not a one of them is to be trusted.
Can you dumb it down for me?
What I am getting is that Clinton paid someone to gather information about Trump and his ties to Russia.
Isn't that simply oppositional research?
15 Feb 2022 7:23 pm
Cannonpointer » 15 Feb 2022, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Duh! He let Putin invade Crimea, and didn't do ****, the coward.
Edit:
Who is online
In total there are 4047 users online :: 0 registered, 19 bots, and 4028 guests
Registered users:
Bots: DuckDuckBot, NING, VelenPublicWebCrawle, aiohttp, TTD-Content, ADmantX, CriteoBot, FDM, Adsbot, DuckDuckGo, GPTBot, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Baiduspider, Applebot, curl/7