Liberal Forum

Beekeeper » 16 Feb 2022, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 7:28 am

Here's a clue for you, morons.

When a Clinton Campaign lawyer is discussed in the filing, it means, without any doubt whatsoever and provable from the Campaign Finance filings made by the candidate, that Hillary paid for the criminal activity.

You morons really are this dense aren't you.

It doesn't have to "say" that she paid for it, the mere fact that it was one of her paid hired hands means SHE knew about it an approved it. Not to mention she used the lies to try to push false information about Trump during her failure of a campaign.

Do you need a roadmap to see that the facts align perfectly that Hillary was up to her neck in this crime?

neueregel » 16 Feb 2022, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 7:35 am

The fact the MSM is ignoring these facts is proof enough that Durham is on the right track.

Beekeeper » 16 Feb 2022, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 7:28 am

Here's a clue for you, morons.

When a Clinton Campaign lawyer is discussed in the filing, it means, without any doubt whatsoever and provable from the Campaign Finance filings made by the candidate, that Hillary paid for the criminal activity.

You morons really are this dense aren't you.

It doesn't have to "say" that she paid for it, the mere fact that it was one of her paid hired hands means SHE knew about it an approved it. Not to mention she used the lies to try to push false information about Trump during her failure of a campaign.

Do you need a roadmap to see that the facts align perfectly that Hillary was up to her neck in this crime?

golfboy » 15 Feb 2022, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:22 pm

No, they actually paid people to lie, then fed those lies to the media and the CIA/FBI.
 

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:17 pm

But legal analysts have told Newsweek that the document isn't the damning evidence conservatives are touting it to be.

"It's not the smoking gun that folks are saying that it is," said Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers.

BEST OF NEWSWEEK VIA EMAIL
Email address

Or as Nick Akerman, a former Watergate prosecutor, put it: "It's absolutely nonsense."

The filing is centered on Michael Sussmann, a lawyer with ties to the Clinton campaign. Sussmann has been charged with a single count of lying to the FBI in 2016 when presenting it with documents that allegedly showed secret communications between the Trump campaign and a Russian bank.

neueregel » 16 Feb 2022, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 7:35 am

The fact the MSM is ignoring these facts is proof enough that Durham is on the right track.

Zeets2 » 16 Feb 2022, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 8:27 am

Use your head, nitwit.  Did it ever occur to you that Sussmann has only been charged with a minor crime that can easily go away, and that's why he's cooperating and rolling over on the other players under Hillary?  Do you really think with so many people involved that once new indictments start coming out, they'll be lining up to throw each other under the bus?

Think Hillary's got enough juice left to take all of them out?  You'd better hope so!

Zeets2 » 16 Feb 2022, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 8:27 am

Use your head, nitwit.  Did it ever occur to you that Sussmann has only been charged with a minor crime that can easily go away, and that's why he's cooperating and rolling over on the other players under Hillary?  Do you really think with so many people involved that once new indictments start coming out, they'll be lining up to throw each other under the bus?

Think Hillary's got enough juice left to take all of them out?  You'd better hope so!

neueregel » 16 Feb 2022, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:03 am

Now that Durham is getting cooperation, one might expect his work to accelerate.

neueregel » 16 Feb 2022, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:03 am

Now that Durham is getting cooperation, one might expect his work to accelerate.

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 6:03 pm

There is nothing to answer, Bad Bobby toady.  At the moment it looks like the narrative you hitched your wagon to was a lie.  And being an avg guy of less than avg intelligence you ran with whatever ever **** your were told to.  

Not the first time for you.  You have no critical thinking skills, Rain man.

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:36 am

Huey » 16 Feb 2022, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:20 am

They also seem to forget we had two years of COVID.

Huey » 16 Feb 2022, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:37 am

So?

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 6:06 pm

Exactly.  Moron’s like @Blackvegetable   know this has the potential to be extremely embarrassing for them.  They bitched and moaned when the archives went away.  Now they are celebrating they did.

Let the spin, lies, diversions and attacks begin.

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:40 am

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 6:06 pm

Exactly.  Moron’s like @Blackvegetable   know this has the potential to be extremely embarrassing for them.  They bitched and moaned when the archives went away.  Now they are celebrating they did.

Let the spin, lies, diversions and attacks begin.

has the potential

Huey » 16 Feb 2022, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:20 am

They also seem to forget we had two years of COVID.

Buffalo » 16 Feb 2022, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 8:43 am

The lapdog, enemy of the people, lying, leftist, corporate controlled media was in on and perpetuated the Trump/Russia LIE.

Huey » 16 Feb 2022, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:41 am

You still own that red shirt?

neueregel » 16 Feb 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:55 am

The media certainly acted as a megaphone for the Democrats. Watching the reputation of legacy media continue to erode has been a source of entertainment.