Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:59 am

Dwarf,

If it was ONE aside, maybe..

But,  the Record..

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am

AnnoyedLiberall » 15 Feb 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:23 am

To be honest, I don't completely understand what is going on here.
I don't want to listen to any news coverage about it, because not a one of them is to be trusted.
Can you dumb it down for me?
What I am getting is that Clinton paid someone to gather information about Trump and his ties to Russia.
Isn't that simply oppositional research?

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel.  When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client.  His billable hours got him caught.  

 

Huey » 16 Feb 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 10:06 am

@Blackvegetable   I note that you started another butt hurt thread,  With PG.  LMAO!  Have fun with it.  That is a settled argument you lost.     

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 10:24 am

It's just a walk through the Record...

Huey » 16 Feb 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 10:25 am

By the way, my narrative is still unchallenged.  Keep running.  You have fun with this.

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 10:29 am

Easy to yap.

And reyap.

Huey » 16 Feb 2022, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 10:30 am

And still not challenged.  You have been on a two day rant about sources.  As I predicted.

golfboy » 12 Feb 2022, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2022, 7:14 pm

Now we're actually getting into it. 
Durham has filed papers linking the Hillary campaign to illegal spying in/on the Trump campaign. 

Tell me how this is different than Watergate.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 9:14 am

Sussman is not "rolling over".

He's going to trial.

You're a **** idiot.

Zeets2 » 16 Feb 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 11:15 am

Yeah, as if a dickhead like you has the inside scoop!
Moron!

Jantje_Smit » 16 Feb 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 10:45 am

Just for fun... the psycho princess doesn't look very happy...

 

Watch Hillary Clinton Dodge Questions About Spying on Donald Trump and Durham Probe

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has refused to answer whether or not her presidential campaign spied on Donald Trump when the two faced each other in the 2016 presidential race.

The former first lady was confronted in the street by a reporter from the Daily Mail, who asked her to comment on the allegations made by John Durham, Special Counsel for the US Department of Justice. A video of the encounter was posted online by the Daily Mail. Hillary Clinton responded to the reporter's questions, waving at her...

https://twitter.com/XStrategiesLLC/stat ... 6808971272

Zeets2 » 16 Feb 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 11:15 am

Yeah, as if a dickhead like you has the inside scoop!
Moron!

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 11:22 am

https://www.businessinsider.com/john-du ... nn-2021-12

**** idiot.

Zeets2 » 16 Feb 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 11:31 am

All that means is they have the next 3 months to entice him to flip.
Guess you've never heard of criminals doing that, huh? 
Or is that too tough for a village idiot like you to understand?
Asshole!

Use your head, nitwit.  Did it ever occur to you that Sussmann has only been charged with a minor crime that can easily go away, and that's why he's cooperating and rolling over on the other players under Hillary? 

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 11:23 am

I've noticed a certain uniformity to your sources...

In memory of Pumpkins

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 11:41 am

Are these your words?

Zeets2 » 16 Feb 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 12:06 pm

Yeah.  And I suppose you never heard of a criminal making a deal prior to the trial date, then changing his plea to guilty after the charge is reduced down to a misdemeanor to avoid the trial?
I'm sure a loser like you would do the same!

Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 12:09 pm

Are these my words?

Zeet,

Limit yourself to comments the truth of which you can actually demonstrate..

That should be precious little.