You are a dickhead...Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Limit yourself to comments the truth of which you can actually demonstrate..

...with delusions of attaining relevance!
Once Trump was the "President Elect", 1000 "lookups" by people working for Trump, who would be likely be working to communicate with Russians, and many other nations... seems about right... if not LOW !!Crazytrain » 12 Feb 2022, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑ For example, the more complete data that Tech Executive-1 and his associates gathered--but did not provide to Agency 2--reflected that between approximately 2014 and 2017, there were a total of more than 3 million lookups of Russian Phone-Prover 1 IP addresses that originated with U.S.-based IP addresses," Durham wrote. "Fewer than 1,000 of these lookups originated with IP addresses affiliated with Trump Tower."
I find it interesting that Trump tower had 1,000 lookups to Russian based ip addresses.
That's not the point..ConservativeWave » 16 Feb 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Once Trump was the "President Elect", 1000 "lookups" by people working for Trump, who would be likely be working to communicate with Russians, and many other nations... seems about right... if not LOW !!
At THAT point we are NOT taking about a Hotel Billionaire any longer... we are talking about the LEADER of the Free WORLD !!
You're hurt...
Democrats never got caught spying on Trump when he was a candidate. Trump got caught trying to brew up dirt on Clinton in discussions with various Russian officials who were under surveillance by the US Intelligence Service. Anybody in the habit of chatting with the bad guys is taking a chance on getting caught by the CIA spooks. It's perfectly legal.Kevin McCarthy
@GOPLeader
Democrats got caught spying, first on candidate Trump.
You aere so full of **** bananabrain, I bet your eyes are brown!!!IkeBana » 16 Feb 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Democrats never got caught spying on Trump when he was a candidate. Trump got caught trying to brew up dirt on Clinton in discussions with various Russian officials who were under surveillance by the US Intelligence Service. Anybody in the habit of chatting with the bad guys is taking a chance on getting caught by the CIA spooks. It's perfectly legal.
Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑No..
I asked you to provide the sources of your narrative, because it's cockeyed..
You shimmied, before admitting that you had read such, but won't identify them.
There's a reason this was dropped on a Friday night, and the Mazars announcement may be it...
That is what you are hiding from.I asked you to provide the sources of your narrative, because it's cockeyed..
@BlackvegetableHuey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑He is not interested in discussing a topic or proving something like a narrative is wrong. He is going to attack you and the sources you use because he can't refute what is posted.neueregel » 15 Feb 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ We've talked on this before and I'll answer now like I did then....I read many, many sources. To get a listing, pull up realclearpoltiics on any day. Those are the sources I read. Even if I read them, that doesn't necessarily mean I believe them...like WaPo, for the reasons stated earlier.
a) Your narrative has been "proven wrong"Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ He is not interested in discussing a topic or proving something like a narrative is wrong. He is going to attack you and the sources you use because he can't refute what is posted.
Let me show you "nailing it"...Huey » 16 Feb 2022, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
Nailed that one. I wish I had added the part about starting a dedicated tribute thread!
They don't have the IQ to understand they are idiots.Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑ a) Your narrative has been "proven wrong"
b) You lied several times in the same thread before finally acknowledging that your only source was FOX
c) There's more...
Have you considered the possibility that @Huey LIKES it in his boxes?
I think it's kinda weird these idiot can even talk about IQ.Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Have you considered the possibility that @Huey LIKES it in his boxes?
Or education, or credultiy.....Crazytrain » 16 Feb 2022, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it's kinda weird these idiot can even talk about IQ.
You really are butt hurt over this. As to your comment to cedar your daughter tell me often “Stick it back in, Lover!”Blackvegetable » 16 Feb 2022, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Have you considered the possibility that @Huey LIKES it in his boxes?
Fredo,Huey » 16 Feb 2022, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ You really are butt hurt over this. As to your comment to cedar your daughter tell me often “Stick it back in, Lover!”
lmao!