Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2022, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 10:43 pm

My mama taught me not to bow to peer pressure and experiment with drugs, pookie.

I don't wear a mask, either. I used to participate in theater, but I've retired from that field.

Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2022, 10:26 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 10:26 pm

Steamrolling the "vaccines" into production wasn't enough. Trump needed a less cavalier attitude. That would have beaten the fake pandemic single handed.

maineman » 16 Feb 2022, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 10:44 pm

never mind.

neueregel » 16 Feb 2022, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 11:22 pm

We saw a cavalier approach followed by a hysterical approach. I don’t see a dimes worth of difference in results. 

One could say Trump was the opposite of cavalier when he ordered the country to be locked down….to our detriment. 

https://mynbc15.com/amp/news/local/stud ... -mortality

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel.  When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client.  His billable hours got him caught.

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:19 am

Total ****.

Huey » 17 Feb 2022, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:21 am

LMAO! Remember, that narrative was based on the information available over the weekend.

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:23 am

So, it's been successfully challenged.

The very first sensational assertion.

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:19 am

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel.  When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client.  His billable hours got him caught.

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office

Total ****.

 

 

Huey » 17 Feb 2022, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:27 am

Challenged?  All you said was it is ****.  No reason, no assertion, no narrative.

Carry on.  Still not challenged.

Some day you will learn that everyone is not like you.  Many of us will look for multiple stories concerning an issue, particularly one that is "sensational". 

We will check multiple outlets, left and right, or wait, to avoid debacles like the Duetsche Bank Subpoena debacle.

Huey » 17 Feb 2022, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:29 am

Very first sentence of the linked article:

First on Fox: Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to "infiltrate" servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an "inference" and "narrative" to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham found.

No, the narrative is not ****.

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:31 am

And that's ****.

Huey » 17 Feb 2022, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:31 am

My summary of THAT article is not ****.  Carry.

Yet, you can not post why it is ****.

Annoyed » wrote:

23 Jan 1970, 8:33 am

golfboy » 12 Feb 2022, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2022, 7:14 pm

Now we're actually getting into it. 
Durham has filed papers linking the Hillary campaign to illegal spying in/on the Trump campaign. 

Tell me how this is different than Watergate.

 

To be honest, I don't completely understand what is going on here.
I don't want to listen to any news coverage about it, because not a one of them is to be trusted.
Can you dumb it down for me?
What I am getting is that Clinton paid someone to gather information about Trump and his ties to Russia.
Isn't that simply oppositional research?

 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am

AnnoyedLiberall » 15 Feb 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 8:23 am

To be honest, I don't completely understand what is going on here.
I don't want to listen to any news coverage about it, because not a one of them is to be trusted.
Can you dumb it down for me?
What I am getting is that Clinton paid someone to gather information about Trump and his ties to Russia.
Isn't that simply oppositional research?

Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians.  The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers. 

In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel.  When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client.  His billable hours got him caught.  

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:38 am

Annoyed didn't ask for a summary of the FOX article.

She asked for the story, zerointegrity.

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:34 am

Dwarf,

Is your defense that you are a slack jawed fool?

And your narrative remains unchallenged because it was crammed into your feedbag by FOX?

You're a **** idiot.

But there's more.

Cannonpointer » 16 Feb 2022, 11:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Feb 2022, 11:41 pm

Trump was very much in on it. He played his role very well. He managed to get one extremely effective generic medicine laughed off the stage - hydroxychloroquine, which is working wonders as a treatment overseas; and set the stage for Ivermectin to be discredited by the MSM. He set in motion the perfect mental climate that his friends in pig farma required. 

I will go this far: No donnie trump, no scamdemic.

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:23 am

Huey » 17 Feb 2022, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 8:21 am

LMAO! Remember, that narrative was based on the information available over the weekend.

So, it's been successfully challenged.

The very first sensational assertion.


 

 

Huey » 17 Feb 2022, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 9:05 am

To quote you, That's ****.

That will be my standard answer.  If it good for THEE it is good for ME.

neueregel » 17 Feb 2022, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2022, 9:02 am

hmmmm...interesting take. Alot to consider.