Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
New Durham Filing: Clinton Campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia
New Durham Filing: Clinton Campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia
By golfboy
12 Feb 2022 6:14 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
18 Feb 2022 1:46 pm
18 Feb 2022 1:59 pm
I have already posted whether or not I stand by those words. Try again, loser.Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2022, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ If you no longer stand by any of them I don't need to.
Thank you.
Too much pathology, too little lifetime
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Feb 2022 2:00 pm
Dude, you are such an authoritarian conservative.
Going to get some range time in. Enjoy another 18 hour day posting in mommas basement.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Feb 2022 2:00 pm
You, rather pointedly, declined to.Huey » 18 Feb 2022, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I have already posted whether or not I stand by those words. Try again, loser.
18 Feb 2022 4:55 pm
Nope, liar, I did not. If you wish I’ll show you’re a liar once again.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Feb 2022 4:58 pm
Is it a trump lie that you will defend or a liberal lue that you get outraged about?Huey » 18 Feb 2022, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope, liar, I did not. If you wish I’ll show you’re a liar once again.
18 Feb 2022 5:17 pm
This is about Durham’s motion and the Fox News misreporting of the motion as it concerns the WH actions.Crazytrain » 18 Feb 2022, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Is it a trump lie that you will defend or a liberal lue that you get outraged about?
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Feb 2022 5:27 pm
Huey » 18 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑Start reconciling, *******. Read my sig for your rule on questions and demands.Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2022, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑
other than your correction, behind which of the details above do you continue to stand?
I don’t do well when ******* attempt to tell me what to do. They get the big **** you.
Why, Dwarf....why?Huey » 18 Feb 2022, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑Nope, liar, I did not. If you wish I’ll show you’re a liar once again.
18 Feb 2022 5:28 pm
18 Feb 2022 5:39 pm
if you have a point, post it. I have already posted Fox misrepresented the WH PART.
Go ahead, Capt Stubing, challenge me on that.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Feb 2022 6:20 pm
Information was gathered initially under Obama. The **** investigation and continued monitoring occurred long after Trump assumed office. Fox may have missed on nuance but not by much.Huey » 18 Feb 2022, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ if you have a point, post it. I have already posted Fox misrepresented the WH PART.
Go ahead, Capt Stubing, challenge me on that.
18 Feb 2022 6:51 pm
Go read it. I've quoted it to you, but evidently you're too stupid to even read THAT.Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Goofball,
Even @Huey , Kneepadder, 1st Class w/Oak Leaf Cluster, is slinking away from this...
18 Feb 2022 6:58 pm
Mainbitch can't read, and always plays these ignorant little games trying to distract from his hero's legal problems.Buffalo » 18 Feb 2022, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ May not have the word "infiltrate in the filing. But what the hell do the terms "assemble purported data", "exploitwed his access to NON-public and/or proprietarty internet data", "mine internet data to estanblish an inference and narrative" mean"? Sounds like spying and infiltrating!!!
18 Feb 2022 7:45 pm
Huey » 18 Feb 2022, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ if you have a point, post it. I have already posted Fox misrepresented the WH PART.
Go ahead, Capt Stubing, challenge me on that.
This is a lie.Nope, liar, I did not. If you wish I’ll show you’re a liar once again.
I am asking you to specify the parts of the paragraph by which you continue to stand.
Let's just do that, this tine.
18 Feb 2022 8:20 pm
You were right here when you said after Trump took office.Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ Basically, Clinton Campaign Lawyers got a tech company to data mine the servers of both Trump towers AND the servers in the White House after BEFORE Trump took office to try and create a narrative that Trump was working with the Russians. The tech company has access to the WH thru a contract to access and maintain the servers.
In a sense, the computer digital equivalent of breaking into the Watergate Hotel. When one of the Lawyers was interviewed by the FBI he lied by saying he was not representing any client. His billable hours got him caught.
Edit.
Correction to the WH story sue to new information.
@Blackvegetable
@Annoyed Liberall
They said they tracked DNS records from "rare, Russian-made wireless phones" at the White House attributed to Trump.
Trump was never at or around the White House during the campaign or during the transition.
Unless it was the Obama administration with the Russian phones...
18 Feb 2022 11:09 pm
That's not what Durham said.golfboy » 12 Feb 2022, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Durham has filed papers linking the Hillary campaign to illegal spying in/on the Trump campaign.
Maybe you should stop watching FOX News.
- John Durham said he's not to blame if members of the media "misinterpreted" details he included in a court filing last week.
- The statement comes as Trump and right-wing outlets falsely claim that the Clinton campaign illegally spied on him.
- The allegations rely on last week's Durham filing, which does not accuse anyone of breaking the law by spying or hacking.
18 Feb 2022 11:19 pm
Durham said that Jaffe was gathering information and passing it to Sussman, who was feeding it to the Clinton campaign.Misty » 19 Feb 2022, 12:09 am » wrote: ↑ That's not what Durham said.
Maybe you should stop watching FOX News.https://www.businessinsider.com/durham- ... ing-2022-2
- John Durham said he's not to blame if members of the media "misinterpreted" details he included in a court filing last week.
- The statement comes as Trump and right-wing outlets falsely claim that the Clinton campaign illegally spied on him.
- The allegations rely on last week's Durham filing, which does not accuse anyone of breaking the law by spying or hacking.
You should actually read it.
18 Feb 2022 11:23 pm
On nuance?Neo » 18 Feb 2022, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Information was gathered initially under Obama. The **** investigation and continued monitoring occurred long after Trump assumed office.
Fox may have missed on nuance but not by much.
They said that the Clinton campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower and White House servers to link Trump to Russia.
They used words like hacking and spying.
Trump said it was a crime that should be punishable by death.
Does this sound nuanced to you?
Really?
Did Durham's filing show that?Why is this idiot allowed to say that kind of **** on his show?
More proof that FOX News doesn't give a crap about the truth.
18 Feb 2022 11:29 pm
Maybe you should actually read the article.golfboy » 19 Feb 2022, 12:19 am » wrote: ↑Durham said that Jaffe was gathering information and passing it to Sussman, who was feeding it to the Clinton campaign.Misty » 19 Feb 2022, 12:09 am » wrote: ↑ That's not what Durham said.
Maybe you should stop watching FOX News.https://www.businessinsider.com/durham- ... ing-2022-2
- John Durham said he's not to blame if members of the media "misinterpreted" details he included in a court filing last week.
- The statement comes as Trump and right-wing outlets falsely claim that the Clinton campaign illegally spied on him.
- The allegations rely on last week's Durham filing, which does not accuse anyone of breaking the law by spying or hacking.
You should actually read it.
He said that the media got it wrong.
No where in his court filing did he accuse the Clinton campaign of hacking or spying, yet that is what they were saying on FOX News.
This idiot went even further.
Show me where in Durham's filing it said anything about hacking into Trump's computers and planting or fabricating evidence.
This is the kind of **** that FOX News does all the time.
I suggest that you don't use them as a source any more if you want to be taken seriously.
19 Feb 2022 1:29 am
Because Watergate was real?golfboy » 12 Feb 2022, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Now we're actually getting into it.
Durham has filed papers linking the Hillary campaign to illegal spying in/on the Trump campaign.
Tell me how this is different than Watergate.
Who is online
In total there are 5038 users online :: 9 registered, 12 bots, and 5017 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Plum Hollow, RebelGator, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: Baiduspider, DataForSeoBot, curl/7, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, DuckDuckGo, Applebot, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot