But,but,but..HILLARY!golfboy » 19 Feb 2022, 12:19 am » wrote: ↑ Durham said that Jaffe was gathering information and passing it to Sussman, who was feeding it to the Clinton campaign.
You should actually read it.
No questions, queer.Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2022, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ To be clear,
Is your story now that, in response to AL's question, you rebleated the talking points she specifically asked you to eschew?
First time.
It continues to evolve, absorbing random wordy things in its path.Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2022, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑ No questions, queer.
Not until you answer the one you keep panty-dancing away from.
If gender and sex are not the same thing - your most recent position, though you said the opposite when you got cornered and it served you, - then why should a mere gender claim affect what sex you shower with and compete against?
Okay - dance away, panty-dancer.
Interesting.Blackvegetable » 19 Feb 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ It continues to evolve, absorbing random wordy things in its path.
No....that's because you're cowards...Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2022, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ Talk to us about your panty dancing, fruit cake.
Interesting.
That is why no one on the board is willing to entertain your questions. It's the panty dancing, fruity.
It's why you prey on the little ones, Jer....Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2022, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What a **** goof you are, panty dancer.
Just when I think you're no longer good for a laugh!
All sequiturs lead to the same, ever evolving, whine.Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2022, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, look - a non sequitur. From a panty dancer.
Or, "Saturday."![]()
Oh, look, panty dancer. I have a super power.Blackvegetable » 19 Feb 2022, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑ All sequiturs lead to the same, ever evolving, whine.

Do you have some link or source?Crazytrain » 12 Feb 2022, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ So trump had 1,000 lookups to a Russian IP address from trump tower.
Why???
Then I guess you don't need me.Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2022, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ What is your modus operandi, fruit cake?
Oh, look, panty dancer. I have a super power.
I can manipulate text to make it APPEAR that you answered a question.
It's like I'm a freaking magician.![]()
"Party dancer". LOL.
^^^ sez the brain damaged moron with a reading disability who is unable to read ANYTHING beyond three sentences without it all jumbling up into a bowl of word soup in his defective head.golfboy » 19 Feb 2022, 12:19 am » wrote: ↑ Durham said that Jaffe was gathering information and passing it to Sussman, who was feeding it to the Clinton campaign.
You should actually read it.
You do understand that has been the claim made by Trump and others for almost 6 years at this point, right? A notion that you and the media have consistently said there was absolutely no truth to. We have moved from absolutely false that espionage occurred, to a nuanced false, on the way to "we spied but it was justified".Misty » 19 Feb 2022, 12:23 am » wrote: ↑ On nuance?
They said that the Clinton campaign paid to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower and White House servers to link Trump to Russia.
They used words like hacking and spying.
Trump said it was a crime that should be punishable by death.
Does this sound nuanced to you?
Really?
Did Durham's filing show that?Why is this idiot allowed to say that kind of **** on his show?
More proof that FOX News doesn't give a crap about the truth.
No...this is nonsense.Neo » 19 Feb 2022, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ You do understand that has been the claim made by Trump and others for almost 6 years at this point, right? A notion that you and the media have consistently said there was absolutely no truth to. We have moved from absolutely false that espionage occurred, to a nuanced false, on the way to "we spied but it was justified".
They were a target. Claiming otherwise is unsupported.Blackvegetable » 19 Feb 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ No...this is nonsense.
They weren't a target....they were simply a suspicious data point in a duly authorized analysis of a class of monitored communication.
Neat trick, but no.