Liberal Forum

Huey » 02 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm

Our third exchange.  

1. with the capacity to develop or happen in the future.
   "newly available oil might potentially create a drop in prices"

Huey » 02 Mar 2022, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 2:57 pm

Not long after.  Hell, moron, you even quoted the post with the words may be in it.  You were trying to make your case BEFORE I stopped adding the qualifiers. 

Yes, dopey lil DEMA, the record is clear.

Blackvegetable » 02 Mar 2022, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 2:57 pm

Dwarf,

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=64622

It's all there...

Blackvegetable » 02 Mar 2022, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 2:59 pm

More retelling...

And you had to add the whole thing about NOT being a sucker....

Huey » 02 Mar 2022, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 2:59 pm

The record is on this thread.  And the record does not look good for ya.  You started yelling about vindication BEFORE I stopped adding a qualifier.

You lose, moron.
 

You started yelling about vindication BEFORE I stopped adding a qualifier.

Huey » 02 Mar 2022, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 3:00 pm

That is not a retelling, Dopey.  That is the record.  Bye!

Blackvegetable » 02 Mar 2022, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 3:02 pm

Is not.

Bye!

You lose....again....

**** idiot.

Huey » 02 Mar 2022, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 3:04 pm

 

Blackvegetable » 02 Mar 2022, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 3:07 pm

I figured that is how you prefer it done...

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 11:22 am

Shame this is being ignored.

 

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 12:13 pm

neueregel » 14 Feb 2022, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 12:10 pm

The fact it's being ignored tells us all we need to know about the severity of what Clinton did. If these revelations haven't put a nail in her political coffin, I don't know what will.

Hope Durham has a food taster...

I haven’t found a mainstream media outlet like CNN, the Post, the NYTs even reporting it.

 

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 1:27 pm

Keep hiding @Blackvegetable  

 

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 1:59 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2022, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 1:56 pm

Dwarf,

Do recall what happened when you declared Levin "vindicated"?

Looking back on it now, and thinking about my sig, do you see how you could have avoided this all time brutal curbstomping event?

Keep running, coward. Your narrative is under attack, your bad Bobby **** is under attack, and all you can do is ask question in an attempt to frame the narrative.

There is no context where you can Curbstomp me.  You are not man enough to try,

 

 

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2022, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 2:06 pm

Is this your yapping?

There is much patology to contemplate in those 14 words..

Weakling, this thread is about the Clinton campaign  spying on the Trump Cqmpaign and the Trump White House.

Keep running from that, old weakling:

 

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm

So, again I ask..

Do recall what happened when you declared Levin "vindicated"?

Looking back on it now, and thinking about my sig, do you see how you could have avoided this all time brutal curbstomping event?

I don’t give a **** what you ask.

 

Blackvegetable » 02 Mar 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 3:16 pm

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 1:59 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2022, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 1:56 pm

Dwarf,

Do recall what happened when you declared Levin "vindicated"?

Looking back on it now, and thinking about my sig, do you see how you could have avoided this all time brutal curbstomping event?

Keep running, coward. Your narrative is under attack, your bad Bobby **** is under attack, and all you can do is ask question in an attempt to frame the narrative.

There is no context where you can Curbstomp me.  You are not man enough to try,

 


 

Forgot to hedge

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2022, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 2:06 pm

Is this your yapping?

There is much patology to contemplate in those 14 words..

Weakling, this thread is about the Clinton campaign  spying on the Trump Cqmpaign and the Trump White House.

Keep running from that, old weakling:


 

Forgot to hedge

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 2:35 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm

So, again I ask..

Do recall what happened when you declared Levin "vindicated"?

Looking back on it now, and thinking about my sig, do you see how you could have avoided this all time brutal curbstomping event?

I don’t give a **** what you ask.


 

Should have given
 

 

Dude, motions have been filed.  The Russia Russia Trump narrative you lived by may be crumbling,

Suck to be a toady like you.  Hide ******.

Huey » 02 Mar 2022, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 3:21 pm

None of those support your case.  They were made AFTER the other one's.

Plus:

1.  The narrative was under attack. No need to qualifier.

2.  That is what the thread was about. No need to qualify.  Particularly since I did it multiple times prior.

3.  Your **** vindicated comment was in response to this:

You lose.

1.  The narrative was under attack. No need to qualifier.

Huey » 02 Mar 2022, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 3:21 pm

None of those support your case.  They were made AFTER the other one's.

Plus:

1.  The narrative was under attack. No need to qualifier.

2.  That is what the thread was about. No need to qualify.  Particularly since I did it multiple times prior.

3.  Your **** vindicated comment was in response to this:

You lose.

2.  That is what the thread was about. No need to qualify.  Particularly since I did it multiple times prior.

Huey » 02 Mar 2022, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2022, 2:59 pm

The record is on this thread.  And the record does not look good for ya.  You started yelling about vindication BEFORE I stopped adding a qualifier.

You lose, moron.

Rube, this is an epic loss on your part.  You are not smart, you’re a lemming, and will attempt to lie your way out of it.  Any topic where you troll me this will be brought up.  Learn to think for yourself, Rainman.  You are not a smart man.

Huey » 18 Feb 2022, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2022, 9:43 am

I am not slinking away.  Although in the motion Durham never said what the time frame was CONCERNING THE WH DATA Fox reported it as during the Trump Administration, which was incorrect.  This is their Bloomberg moment.

Next, you still have the data from Trump Towers.  That is not being disputed by Sussmann.  Additionally, all of this is in the factual background section, not where the charges are.  The WH was mentioned because one of Sussmann’s lawyers worked at the WH as Deputy WH Counsel when it occurred and may be a conflict of interest.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/17/us/d ... trump.html

Additionally, I have posted Sussman’s stance on the WH portion earlier in the week.  No sir, you are lying again when you claim I am slinking away.

Huey » 14 Feb 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Feb 2022, 1:59 pm

Keep running, coward. Your narrative is under attack, your bad Bobby **** is under attack, and all you can do is ask question in an attempt to frame the narrative.

There is no context where you can Curbstomp me.  You are not man enough to try,

Blackvegetable » 19 Oct 2022, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2022, 8:17 am

Nrasobphobia » 19 Oct 2022, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2022, 9:43 am

You have no "cred" faux of-colored boy