ha ha ha ha ha. Now matter which side "they" are on. Your second sentence is pure accusation as usual. Everyone else is corrupt but your side saving artificial truths, social justifications, human rights to denounce life in real time.Crazytrain » 31 Mar 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ All war criminals should be brought up on charges. No matter who's side you are on.
Disregard.Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2022, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » 31 Mar 2022, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑1. Nope.Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2022, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Have you been to Ukraine, to gather this intel personally - or do you have trusted agents on the ground?Ducked the question. And lied.Huey » 31 Mar 2022, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑2. I don’t watch an MSNBC AT ALL.Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2022, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑2. Are you aware that MSNBC is saying this ****, and that they did INDEED call rittenhouse those names?And here's how we know you lied. ^Huey » 31 Mar 2022, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑3. I was referring to the tank a few a weeks that obviously swerved to intentionally run over a civilians car.Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2022, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑3. Has no one informed you that the civilian was in truth run over by an A.A. gun piloted by a hastily retreating Ukrainian soldier?
You drank the propaganda about who and what it was. You allowed what you HEARD to utterly taint what you SAW.
It wasn't a tank and it wasn't a Russian. You have no idea what you saw - not the first clue. You have NARRATIVE.
You say it "obviously" swerved, "to run over that car." Like it isn't even possible that it lost control. It was going like a bat out of hell.
Still not a **** tank - a mobile AA gun. Every tank has a designation. If that was a Russian tank, a very BASIC google search will tell us what Russian tank it was. Was it a T-72? A T-80? A T-90?
WHICH RUSSIAN TANK DID YOU SEE, HUEY? TELL US WHAT RUSSIAN TANK YOU SAW "DELIBERATELY SWERVE" TO RUN OVER A CAR. You're a **** witness to a crime - an EYE witness.
Let's hear your **** testimony, *** - WHAT RUSSIAN TANK WAS THAT?
Do you need to check in with your counsel before you give us your eye witness testimony? The law firm of MSNBC and Fox?
Two thing you were correct on.Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2022, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑
Ducked the question. And lied.
And here's how we know you lied. ^
You drank the propaganda about who and what it was. You allowed what you HEARD to utterly taint what you SAW.
It wasn't a tank and it wasn't a Russian. You have no idea what you saw - not the first clue. You have NARRATIVE.
You say it "obviously" swerved, "to run over that car." Like it isn't even possible that it lost control. It was going like a bat out of hell.
Still not a **** tank - a mobile AA gun. Every tank has a designation. If that was a Russian tank, a very BASIC google search will tell us what Russian tank it was. Was it a T-72? A T-80? A T-90?
WHICH RUSSIAN TANK DID YOU SEE, HUEY? TELL US WHAT RUSSIAN TANK YOU SAW "DELIBERATELY SWERVE" TO RUN OVER A CAR. You're a **** witness to a crime - an EYE witness.
Let's hear your **** testimony, *** - WHAT RUSSIAN TANK WAS THAT?
Do you need to check in with your counsel before you give us your eye witness testimony? The law firm of MSNBC and Fox?
Seems to you, life isn't real, just dreams intellectual minds made up in fantasies of existing any other way than biologically displaced now.slideman » 01 Apr 2022, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ The Geneva conventions apply whether war has been declared or not.
Both sides are guilty of war crimes.
Seems to me like those committed by Russia are the more egregious.
AGAIN you resort to effeminate lies.Pastafarian » 01 Apr 2022, 4:28 am » wrote: ↑
Rittenhouse shot and killed someone before he was chased.
On more teeny teeny thing.Huey » 01 Apr 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ Two thing you were correct on.
It is an armored missile launcher.
it did appear to be out of control.
One thing.Cannonpointer » 01 Apr 2022, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ On more teeny teeny thing.
It was **** Ukrainian - not Russia.
Wait - another teeny thing. It means ONE you were lied to and TWO you **** bought it. The REST of what you bought is equally suspect.
You need new eyes - eyes unaffected by the MSM narratives. You need to discount EVERYTHING they say, and do a gut check. Putin is opposing tranny culture. NATO is pushing it. Ukraine is the battlefield.
UKRAINE IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS WAR. It is a battlefield in this war. It's people are collateral damage by NATO policy and by Russian existential necessity. Putin won't even have peace talks with Ukraine - he insists on peace talks including western european leaders.
Update - this might have changed.
I need proof it was Ukrainian.Cannonpointer » 01 Apr 2022, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ On more teeny teeny thing.
It was **** Ukrainian - not Russia.
Wait - another teeny thing. It means ONE you were lied to and TWO you **** bought it. The REST of what you bought is equally suspect.
You need new eyes - eyes unaffected by the MSM narratives. You need to discount EVERYTHING they say, and do a gut check. Putin is opposing tranny culture. NATO is pushing it. Ukraine is the battlefield.
UKRAINE IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS WAR. It is a battlefield in this war. It's people are collateral damage by NATO policy and by Russian existential necessity. Putin won't even have peace talks with Ukraine - he insists on peace talks including western european leaders.
Update - this might have changed. It looks like the talks in Turkey are between Russia and Ukraine - still trying to get to the bottom of it.
I heard he has the best propaganda out there. Just wait.Huey » 01 Apr 2022, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I need proof it was Ukrainian.
Today I saw picture of what it is reported as a Russian Tank Convoy. Problem is you can’t tell. Just like I ask you for proof I need proof on that.
Since you started this with the claim it is Russian, it is you who owes proof.Huey » 01 Apr 2022, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I need proof it was Ukrainian.
Today I saw picture of what it is reported as a Russian Tank Convoy. Problem is you can’t tell. Just like I ask you for proof I need proof on that.
On my original comment I already admitted you were correct and I was wrong. I don’t know whose it is.Cannonpointer » 01 Apr 2022, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Since you started this with the claim it is Russian, it is you who owes proof.
That's important. Because the media is telling you it's Russian, it's a tank, and it was done on purpose.Huey » 01 Apr 2022, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ On my original comment I already admitted you were correct and I was wrong. I don’t know whose it is.
^^^^CP lies like a bitch ho.Cannonpointer » 01 Apr 2022, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ AGAIN you resort to effeminate lies.
You are either shameless, or you are stupid.
He is either a shameless liar, or he is genuinely stupid. ^Pastafarian » 01 Apr 2022, 4:28 am » wrote: ↑Rittenhouse shot and killed someone before he was chased.
They tend to believe lies over facts.Crazytrain » 01 Apr 2022, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑ One thing.
You fell for the propaganda.
I can't believe you guys fell for the propaganda.
Billy Graham "was" a false prophet... may he Rest In Peace.Taipan » 31 Mar 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ Here brother.
Let me share.
Billy Graham.
https://youtu.be/Ae_2AL5XZtk
If you read the thread you post to you could understand that I was replying to the opponent who said that Russia did not declare war. And as result the prisoners are not POW and Geneva convention does not apply. I pointed out that it was the same with US war in Vietnam. That was the similarity between the wars I was talking about. So you rant is irrelevant.IkeBana » 31 Mar 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ More false **** equivalence from the Putin cheerleaders. Vietnam was about **** up anti-communist politics...about US politicians being so fearful of losing their cushy congressional seats because they weren't anti-communist enough (which had already been going on since the end of WWII), that they happily sent over 50,000 mostly conscripts to die in Vietnam and another two and a half million to be permanently disabled from their service in Vietnam. So that Not any different from the US politicans who are terrified of not being anti-Muslim or anti-Mexican enough, or pro-Trump enough.
This war has nothing to do with the politics of Vietnam. It has only to do with a sick autocrat and the **** up Russian people who support him. The **** up Russian people who decided to trade in the tyranny of the Tsar's for the tyranny of the Kremlin, and trade that for the tyranny of Vladimir Putin.
And then there are the **** like you who only knows their desire for the tyranny of a sociopathic grifter who they think is gonna give them their **** country back. Not happening...you're already in the minority. The results of the vote counts in seven of the last eight presidential elections confirm that it ain't your country anymore. It's more an more a plural society...and it's everybody's country whether they conform to your bigoted notions of politics, ideology, religion, race and behavior, or not.
https://strana-krovi.com/videos/107973- ... aya-reznyaMurder of Russian prisoners by the Ukrainian military. All of them had their throats cut.
This s what they do when they have a chanceFOS » 30 Mar 2022, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Liberals love this ****. Looking at the first few comments I can see them salivating.