I already pointed out that the Mueller investigation concluded no collusion, as well as the investigation of obstruction proved because there was no criminal activity being obstructed. ..Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ Then go **** yourself, Hank.
Averting your eyes from your wounds doesn't mean you ain't leaving bleeding.
No, ignorant Vagina, that would be Dennis. Odd your comments about Vets never seem to apply to lefties. I’ll bump it for you.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ **** off, slack jaw..
I'm tossing The Dwarf.
Go wait for your gubmint check.
Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ The only fact I acknowledge is both these stories are a by product of the Jan 6th commission.
Now take your stand, offer your narrative of why you are running from the stories you conflated, and acknowledge you were answered and no more questions will be entertained.
Or, I accept your surrender.
So you don't know why the January 6th Commission was convened?The only fact I acknowledge is both these stories are a by product of the Jan 6th commission.
Shhhh.Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ No, ignorant Vagina, that would be Dennis. Odd your comments about Vets never seem to apply to lefties. I’ll bump it for you.
You forgot to read a part of the comment. I accept your surrender.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ So you don't know why the January 6th Commission was convened?
Yes, or no..
I'm not interested in a replay.Hank » 03 Apr 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ I already pointed out that the Mueller investigation concluded no collusion, as well as the investigation of obstruction proved because there was no criminal activity being obstructed. ..
Two years and millions of dollars conducting a Witch hunt.
Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ **** off, slack jaw..
I'm tossing The Dwarf.
Go wait for your gubmint check.
I’m on point, BlackVagina. You are afraid to take a stand.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Shhhh.
Focus....you know how easily distracted you get.
That's irrelevant.Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ You forgot to read a part of the comment. I accept your surrender.
Now take your stand, offer your narrative of why you are running from the stories you conflated, and acknowledge you were answered and no more questions will be entertained.
Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not interested in a replay.
Who chose not to prosecute?
I keep having to remind you.
Answer the question asked, ****.
You didn’t post my own words. You asked yet another question. And I will acknowledge my own words, like I did this morning by placing them in context.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ That's irrelevant.
Again.
If you decline to acknowledge your own words, or stipulate to objective fact, this is entirely pointless.
I just did. That was the last one. Then you can answer the question asked. We are not in court, and you are not a lawyer.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ I keep having to remind you.
Now answer the question asked.
Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You didn’t post my own words. You asked yet another question. And I will acknowledge my own words, like I did this morning by placing them in context.
Here is your last answer. If all you do is ask a question I will accept your loss concerning the discussion of the two stories
Yes, I know why the Jan 6th commission is investigating. So? Take a stand on the stories..
Just answer the question.You didn’t post my own words. You asked yet another question
Stop wasting bandwidth.Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I just did. That was the last one. Then you can answer the question asked. We are not in court, and you are not a lawyer.
I did answer the 2nd question. And you ave a question to answer.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Just answer the question.
This must be resolved, otherwise there is no point in moving forward.
Read the thread before posting. I just gave you more words to ear, Perry.
Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑No..it isn't.Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ That actually is the issue. Of you wish you give us the narrative form of what you think the issue is and take a stand on it.
What is the January 6th Committe investigating, Dwarf?
Let's get this done..Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑I did answer the 2nd question. And you ave a question to answer.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Just answer the question.
This must be resolved, otherwise there is no point in moving forward.
Here is the answer again:
You didn’t post my own words. You asked yet another question. And I will acknowledge my own words, like I did this morning by placing them in context.
Here is your last answer. If all you do is ask a question I will accept your loss concerning the discussion of the two stories.
Yes, I know why the Jan 6th commission is investigating. So? Take a stand on the stories.