Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 12:26 pm

Let's get this done..

You got your answer.  I accept your admission of defeat.

The Jan 6th commission is investigating the events of Jan 6th 2020.  We are discussing an aspect (two stories) of that day that were leaked to the press.  Problem there is no evidence of any cri,inal acts occurring and only speculation as to what happened with the phone log and diary.

Your turn.  Don’t be a Vagina.

Question time is over.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:11 am

Then never presume to explain anything, ever.

To anyone.

 OK    
viewtopic.php?p=1933178#p1933178

The FAKE NEWS IS & ALWAYS HAS BEEN U **** PUTINISTA RNC SCUM!  YOUR FART WAS USING UNSECURED CELL PHONES TO PLOT INSURRECTION THAT U UNAMERICAN NAZI SCUM STILL SUPPORT!

U **** RNC TRAITORS SHOULD ALL BE RECOGNIZED FOR THE ANTI-AMERICAN RNC NAZI SCUM THAT U ARE!

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm

You got your answer.  I accept your admission of defeat.

The Jan 6th commission is investigating the events of Jan 6th 2020.  We are discussing an aspect (two stories) of that day that were leaked to the press.  Problem there is no evidence of any cri,inal acts occurring and only speculation as to what happened with the phone log and diary.

Your turn.  Don’t be a Vagina.

Question time is over.

 

The Jan 6th commission is investigating the events of Jan 6th 2020

Next time, first time.

The committee subpoenaed the Grifty Junta for the records of those days. Grifty complied. The records indicate a 7 hr gap during the Insurrection.

The details of these records became public. There was speculation about whether or not the records were complete. There is reason to believe they may be (there is a matter of a call from the WH to Sen. Lee).

But the WH call logs are not exhaustive. Knowing this, the committee also interviewed the WH diarist, tasked with the job of recording such activities. They testified that communications dried up in the period leading up to the desecration of the US Capitol by proudly crazed rubes incited by Worse than Buchanan.

Whether or not this involves illegalities would be a matter of a second commission. The mandate of this is to try to determine what happened in the leadup to this nauseatingly shameful episode, and the response of the Chief Traitor to events.

in that particular context, Grifty's behavior - given that we know he made calls which are unrecorded - provides yet more evidence of his contribution to this indellible skidmark on the Stars and Stripes.

Do not confuse this with any criminal trial. No presumption of innocence is demanded, nor warranted.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 12:47 pm

Next time, first time.

The committee subpoenaed the Grifty Junta for the records of those days. Grifty complied. The records indicate a 7 hr gap during the Insurrection.

The details of these records became public. There was speculation about whether or not the records were complete. There is reason to believe they may be (there is a matter of a call from the WH to Sen. Lee).

But the WH call logs are not exhaustive. Knowing this, the committee also interviewed the WH diarist, tasked with the job of recording such activities. They testified that communications dried up in the period leading up to the desecration of the US Capitol by proudly crazed rubes incited by Worse than Buchanan.

Whether or not this involves illegalities would be a matter of a second commission. The mandate of this is to try to determine what happened in the leadup to this nauseatingly shameful episode, and the response of the Chief Traitor to events.

in that particular context, Grifty's behavior - given that we know he made calls which are unrecorded - provides yet more evidence of his contribution to this indellible skidmark on the Stars and Stripes.

Do not confuse this with any criminal trial. No presumption of innocence is demanded, nor warranted.

That wasn’t so hard.  Next do that the first time.

There is a couple issues with your post.  Both events are not unusual.  As far as the phone logs as it is not unusual to have gaps.  Trump’s phone behavior was no different than the previous years of his tenure.  As it has been exhaustingly told to you your own sources told it was no different than Obama’s.  As far as the gaps you are not taking into account where the calls where made from, if any at all.  That is part of your first story.  I posted that for you the other day.  Or even who was dialing.

As far as the diary, the second story, it is still speculation due to short staffing and who was doing what.  It is NOT illegal to not create a diary.  It is only illegal to destroy it.

A second commission?  That’s ****.  It is not needed.  You need to tell your boys to wrap this one up quick before November rolls around.  You have your commission, no matter how stacked it is.

The phone log story is fake news and there is no evidence of wrongdoing in the second.

@Blackvegetable  

To sum up you want a second commission to look at events that did not break the law.  Let it go, Vagina.  The American Public does not care at this point concerning the Midterms.  

You are looking for a talking point to promote thru the November election.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 1:00 pm

@Blackvegetable  

To sum up you want a second commission to look at events that did not break the law.  Let it go, Vagina.  The American Public does not care at this point concerning the Midterms.  

You are looking for a talking point to promote thru the November election.

No...I haven't said anything of the sort.

You must learn how to read.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm

That wasn’t so hard.  Next do that the first time.

There is a couple issues with your post.  Both events are not unusual.  As far as the phone logs as it is not unusual to have gaps.  Trump’s phone behavior was no different than the previous years of his tenure.  As it has been exhaustingly told to you your own sources told it was no different than Obama’s.  As far as the gaps you are not taking into account where the calls where made from, if any at all.  That is part of your first story.  I posted that for you the other day.  Or even who was dialing.

As far as the diary, the second story, it is still speculation due to short staffing and who was doing what.  It is NOT illegal to not create a diary.  It is only illegal to destroy it.

A second commission?  That’s ****.  It is not needed.  You need to tell your boys to wrap this one up quick before November rolls around.  You have your commission, no matter how stacked it is.

The phone log story is fake news and there is no evidence of wrongdoing in the second.

What took time was getting you to stipulate to an objective fact, 37X

# readhissig
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 1:20 pm

No...I haven't said anything of the sort.

You must learn how to read.

Your words:

Whether or not this involves illegalities would be a matter of a second commission. The mandate of this is to try to determine what happened in the leadup to this nauseatingly shameful episode, and the response of the Chief Traitor to events.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 1:21 pm

What took time was getting you to stipulate to an objective fact, 37X

# readhissig

Well, I accept your surrender.  You should have read.  It pretty much puts a damper on your thoughts.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 1:31 pm

Well, I accept your surrender.  You should have read.  It pretty much puts a damper on your thoughts.

I don't know why you keep yapping that, Toady.

Remember, I am frequently obliged to explain what you're thinking. 

It pretty much puts a damper on your thoughts.

Dwarf,

The emerging facts continue to make a usefool of you.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 1:30 pm

Your words:

Whether or not this involves illegalities would be a matter of a second commission. The mandate of this is to try to determine what happened in the leadup to this nauseatingly shameful episode, and the response of the Chief Traitor to events.

Need I labor why that is not this

To sum up you want a second commission to look at events that did not break the law.  

?

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 1:36 pm

I don't know why you keep yapping that, Toady.

Remember, I am frequently obliged to explain what you're thinking. 

Dwarf,

The emerging facts continue to make a usefool of you.

There really haven’t been any emerging facts.  You have one CNN story that had to be corrected, walked back, and another that gives multiple reasons why something could have occurred.  As far as the diary I am inclined to go with the speculation in YOUR article that due to staffing shortages and confusion concerning who does what is why it was not completed.

What has emerged is speculation concerning two incidents that broke no laws and behavior that occurred with the president previous to Trump as it pertains to these stories.

This could change.  Evidence may come forward to show nefarious motives. BUT like most stories the past four years I doubt it will.  You are living on a wish and a prayer.

Remember, your talking point is Trump is an idiot.  Now you want us to believe that Trump masterminded this entire event down to every little detail.  

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 1:42 pm

Need I labor why that is not this

?

No, the record is clear.  In one post you call for a second commission to investigate the legality of the two issues and in another claim you didn’t.

Im good.  I’ll go with that.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm

There really haven’t been any emerging facts.  You have one CNN story that had to be corrected, walked back, and another that gives multiple reasons why something could have occurred.  As far as the diary I am inclined to go with the speculation in YOUR article that due to staffing shortages and confusion concerning who does what is why it was not completed.

What has emerged is speculation concerning two incidents that broke no laws and behavior that occurred with the president previous to Trump as it pertains to these stories.

This could change.  Evidence may come forward to show nefarious motives. BUT like most stories the past four years I doubt it will.  You are living on a wish and a prayer.

Remember, your talking point is Trump is an idiot.  Now you want us to believe that Trump masterminded this entire event down to every little detail.

Dwarf,
you suck at this.


 
 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 2:50 pm

No, the record is clear.  In one post you call for a second commission to investigate the legality of the two issues and in another claim you didn’t.

Im good.  I’ll go with that.

No, I don't.

You can't read
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 2:55 pm

Dwarf,
you suck at this.


 

Lmao, Troll.  I am not the poster who spams the forum each day with the same pic because you ran out of bullseye and can’t argue what I posted.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 2:55 pm

No, I don't.

You can't read

Ok, you stick to that story.  Nothing I can debate with a guy of low integrity and honesty.
 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:02 pm

Ok, you stick to that story.  Nothing I can debate with a guy of low integrity and honesty.

Dwarf,

I'm not the one who refuses to acknowledge his own words, or even objective facts.

That's still you.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:04 pm

Dwarf,

I'm not the one who refuses to acknowledge his own words, or even objective facts.

That's still you.

Bet story straight Mental Midget.  It is the fact that I don’t acknowledge in the narrow format you demand like a crazed hitler follower.  I don’t play the yes/no game when you cherry pick an d attempt to reframe the comments.  

I am not obligated to do things your way.  Live with it, Nazi.