Liberal Forum

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:06 pm

Bet story straight Mental Midget.  It is the fact that I don’t acknowledge in the narrow format you demand like a crazed hitler follower.  I don’t play the yes/no game when you cherry pick an d attempt to reframe the comments.  

I am not obligated to do things your way.  Live with it, Nazi.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:10 pm

No...your words are your words.

A man acknowledges his words, and objective facts.

Period.

If a man believes his words have been taken out of context, he demonstrates it.

I remind you again that you only hold yourself to a "vague narrative" standard.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:01 pm

Lmao, Troll.  I am not the poster who spams the forum each day with the same pic because you ran out of bullseye and can’t argue what I posted.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:14 pm

Dwarf,

If you won't acknowledge your own words, why would you acknowledge that your **** talking points have been vaporized?

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:14 pm

I do demonstrate it Mental Midget every time .by posting the entire quote and saying they are my words.  That pisses you off to no end simply because I don’t follow your demands.  Demands intended to reframe and control a discussion.  Your best bet is in the future to just use the quote function and highlight the portion you wish to spin.  My practice will continue.  

As a side note a ****** who can’t admit he lost a challenge when faced with irrefutable has NO high ground to lecture anyone concerning what it takes to be a man.

I do demonstrate it Mental Midget every time .by posting the entire quote and saying they are my words

Demands intended to reframe and control a discussion

As a side note a ****** who can’t admit he lost a challenge when faced with irrefutable has NO high ground to lecture anyone concerning what it takes to be a man.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:16 pm

Slrry, that is a lie.  You don’t like how I acknowledge them.  And I am going to continue to do that regardless of the tales your tell.  

Just remember, every time you claim I do not acknowledge my words you are lying. You are throwing a temper tantrum because you can’t get your way meaning you can not reframe or control the conversation.  This is ain’t a court of law, and you ain’t a trial lawyer, Perry.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:18 pm

No, lying little piece of ****. You don't.

No one cares about the rest of it, UNLESS YOU CAN MAKE A CASE THAT IT IS OUT OF CONTEXT.

No, Controlly...stop projecting that crap.

Dwarf,

Again.

You refuse to acknowledge your own words, and objective facts.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:14 pm

Dwarf,

If you won't acknowledge your own words, why would you acknowledge that your **** talking points have been vaporized?

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:19 pm

No, Dwarf

There are no "ways".

There is "yes", "no", or "can't recall".

Stands.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:23 pm

When you post this I. Certainly will.  But that has yet to happen.

Tell you what.  If you can answer one simple question and own up to your words concerning I will re evaluate.

Did Jan 2020 come before or after Feb 2020?

Game.  Set. Match.

Got that hat beach pic yet?

How about your BLS defeat?

When you post this I. Certainly will.  But that has yet to happen.

Tell you what.  If you can answer one simple question and own up to your words concerning I will re evaluate.

Did Jan 2020 come before or after Feb 2020?

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:49 am

Those are my words taken from this post:

1.  That is NOT the missing phone log story.  Either intentionally or thru ignorance you conflating two separate issues.

2.. This was Pointed out to you as well:

But sources close to the panel's investigation do not seem to know yet who, if anyone, directed a change in record-keeping or what the motivation behind that change was, raising questions about whether the lack of information was intentional or for staffing issues.

"It's tough to know what that change was. Was it intentional?" one source said. "You can only keep track of something when you know what's going on. When people don't share things with you, whether that was intentional and who decided that, I think it's a little murky at this point."

Then there is this:

CNN previously reported that a likely explanation for the gap in the phone log is that Trump used cell phones, direct landlines or aides' phones that bypassed the White House switchboard. An official review of the call logs found no missing pages.

And then there was this:

For one, sources told CNN that early January was a chaotic time inside the White House and that Trump was spending more time in the residence and conducting less official business.
According to one former Trump official, "all sense of normal order started to break down" and around early January, "the cracks were showing." While some people had been looking to find other jobs, others had been confused and it became "every man for himself," the former official added.

Now back to the fact that your are running from the FACT that unless you can prove diary record (NOT PHONE LOGS) were destroyed no law was broken.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:23 pm

When you post this I. Certainly will.  But that has yet to happen.

Tell you what.  If you can answer one simple question and own up to your words concerning I will re evaluate.

Did Jan 2020 come before or after Feb 2020?

Game.  Set. Match.

Got that hat beach pic yet?

How about your BLS defeat?

How about your BLS defeat?

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:29 pm

You lie is exposed.  You claim I never acknowledge my words.  Well, that is how I always do it.  You lied.

Buh bye.

Game.  Set.  A match

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:29 pm

 

"Whats 3.5, dwarf?"

"You tell me."

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:30 pm

Don't, dwarf.

The record is clear.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:31 pm

It is.  It shows you lied.  I acknowledged my words. 

Again, you have no high ground on discussing how a man acts.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:30 pm

We are done.  In one devastating blow I exposed your lie that I NEVER acknowledge my words.  And proved that what pisses you off is I don’t allow you to control the conversation and ignore your demands,

And proved that what pisses you off is I don’t allow you to control the conversation and ignore your demands,

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:34 pm

Dwarf, 

Do you want to see yourself not doing so, repeatedly?

Wanna see yourself refusing to acknowledge objective facts, repeatedly?

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:42 pm

Are these your word?   

I've you've got a point to make, do so.

Under no **** circumstances expect me to answer any question or meet any demand.

Are these your word?   

I've you've got a point to make, do so.

Under no **** circumstances expect me to answer any question or meet any demand.

Now take your stand, offer your narrative of why you are running from the stories you conflated, and acknowledge you were answered and no more questions will be entertained.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 4:13 pm

Absolutely not.

Yes.

Do you have a point?

Are these yours, She-bitch of the SS?