Liberal Forum

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 5:37 pm

For like the first time ever.  Remember, I have asked you this multiple times since you posted them.  This is the time you **** answered.

Dtill waiting for you to answer this:

Did Jan 2020 came before or after Feb 2020?

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 5:40 pm

Acknowledge that you were wrong, again.

It will put the rest of your **** in context.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 5:39 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 5:39 pm

What is that?

Yes, no, can't recall.

Ya follah?

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 5:45 pm

Why you running:

Did Jan 2020 came before or after Feb 2020?

Im not wrong.  Your statement would be correct if you said I answered it the first time it was asked TODAY.

Did Jan 2020 came before or after Feb 2020?

Im not wrong.  Your statement would be correct if you said I answered it the first time it was asked TODAY

For like the first time ever.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 5:50 pm

Lmao!

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 6:04 pm

Already answered. Repeatedly.

Are these your words?

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 6:05 pm

No, Sheilagh...that is how a man answers that question..

A crack ho would go on and on.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 6:10 pm

You have no clue how a man does anything. You live in a protective bubble and have since man slept with titled family members.  You have no clue what the real world is like.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 6:09 pm

No, you never answered it. The correct answer is before.  Meaning you lost your challenge,

Stop lying:

You know they are my words.  So?  They are true,

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 6:11 pm

Sheilagh, please.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 6:11 pm

How about "the issue"?

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 6:13 pm

Lmao!  Lil man, I’m out.  You lose.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 6:12 pm

You know when a Vagina can’t take the truth.  He/she uses strike thru.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 6:22 am

the gap is still there, dumb ****..

With the establishment media abuzz this week with articles about a “seven-hour gap” in White House switchboard logs on January 6, it came to light on Thursday night the gap was reportedly due to the use of ordinary landlines and cell phones.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:49 am

Those are my words taken from this post:

1.  That is NOT the missing phone log story.  Either intentionally or thru ignorance you conflating two separate issues.

2.. This was Pointed out to you as well:

But sources close to the panel's investigation do not seem to know yet who, if anyone, directed a change in record-keeping or what the motivation behind that change was, raising questions about whether the lack of information was intentional or for staffing issues.

"It's tough to know what that change was. Was it intentional?" one source said. "You can only keep track of something when you know what's going on. When people don't share things with you, whether that was intentional and who decided that, I think it's a little murky at this point."

Then there is this:

CNN previously reported that a likely explanation for the gap in the phone log is that Trump used cell phones, direct landlines or aides' phones that bypassed the White House switchboard. An official review of the call logs found no missing pages.

And then there was this:

For one, sources told CNN that early January was a chaotic time inside the White House and that Trump was spending more time in the residence and conducting less official business.
According to one former Trump official, "all sense of normal order started to break down" and around early January, "the cracks were showing." While some people had been looking to find other jobs, others had been confused and it became "every man for himself," the former official added.

Now back to the fact that your are running from the FACT that unless you can prove diary record (NOT PHONE LOGS) were destroyed no law was broken.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:49 am

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:45 am

Are these your words, DMA?

Just "yes", or "no".

Those are my words taken from this post:



1.  That is NOT the missing phone log story.  Either intentionally or thru ignorance you conflating two separate issues.

2.. This was Pointed out to you as well:

But sources close to the panel's investigation do not seem to know yet who, if anyone, directed a change in record-keeping or what the motivation behind that change was, raising questions about whether the lack of information was intentional or for staffing issues.

"It's tough to know what that change was. Was it intentional?" one source said. "You can only keep track of something when you know what's going on. When people don't share things with you, whether that was intentional and who decided that, I think it's a little murky at this point."

Then there is this:

CNN previously reported that a likely explanation for the gap in the phone log is that Trump used cell phones, direct landlines or aides' phones that bypassed the White House switchboard. An official review of the call logs found no missing pages.

And then there was this:

For one, sources told CNN that early January was a chaotic time inside the White House and that Trump was spending more time in the residence and conducting less official business.
According to one former Trump official, "all sense of normal order started to break down" and around early January, "the cracks were showing." While some people had been looking to find other jobs, others had been confused and it became "every man for himself," the former official added.

Now back to the fact that your are running from the FACT that unless you can prove diary record (NOT PHONE LOGS) were destroyed no law was broken.

 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:31 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 3:30 pm

Don't, dwarf.

The record is clear.

It is.  It shows you lied.  I acknowledged my words. 

Again, you have no high ground on discussing how a man acts.

 

B.Seeisashill » 21 May 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 8:23 am

B. SEE. SPREADS FAKE NEWS...WHAT A LOSER
My user name says it all!

Squatchman » 21 May 2022, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:12 am

  That B.See lives in your head.