No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Was Levin vindicated?
Reevaluate what?
You're a zero integrity coward.
Of course it does
I recall that being in the context of what you described as an "issue"..
What was it?
(In your words.)
No questions, dick sucker.
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
Do you want to see yourself not doing so, repeatedly?
Wanna see yourself refusing to acknowledge objective facts, repeatedly?
No questions, dick sucker.
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑ No, dwarf....not
Because blackvegetable...
Take responsibility.
why did you refuse to answer questions before?
No questions, dick sucker.
No questions, dick sucker.
Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Already answered. Repeatedly.
Are these your words?
No questions, dick sucker.
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 21 Sep 2022, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ When you get to the old archives, will you tell me?
I watched a short clip of B.See gather info for his threads...
whereas YOU blow MIS-information from your ARSE on the FLY.roadkill » 22 Sep 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ I watched a short clip of B.See gather info for his threads...
Nahhhh. You're just relieved because you thought I had your *** on IGNORE. LMAOroadkill » 22 Sep 2022, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑...I'm in yer head now. I tricked you into breaking yer own peanut gallery standards.
![]()
Yer on a roll B...
B.See » 22 Sep 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Nahhhh. You're just relieved because you thought I had your *** on IGNORE. LMAO![]()
What's worse, I wonder? Having someone on ignore and being unable to see them, or being able to see them and NOT GIVING A FLYING **** about what they say??![]()
![]()
What's even worse for trolls like you is being told that no one gives a **** about your spam.... it obviously hurts or else you wouldn't be out of your safe space desperately trying to convince us that you don't care... lol... it isn't working, TROLL... we are just laughing at your misery...B.See » 22 Sep 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Nahhhh. You're just relieved because you thought I had your *** on IGNORE. LMAO![]()
What's worse, I wonder? Having someone on ignore and being unable to see them, or being able to see them and NOT GIVING A FLYING **** about what they say??![]()
![]()