Liberal Forum

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:16 am

1.  That is NOT the missing phone log story.  Either intentionally or thru ignorance you conflating two separate issues.

2.. This was Pointed out to you as well:

But sources close to the panel's investigation do not seem to know yet who, if anyone, directed a change in record-keeping or what the motivation behind that change was, raising questions about whether the lack of information was intentional or for staffing issues.

"It's tough to know what that change was. Was it intentional?" one source said. "You can only keep track of something when you know what's going on. When people don't share things with you, whether that was intentional and who decided that, I think it's a little murky at this point."

Then there is this:

CNN previously reported that a likely explanation for the gap in the phone log is that Trump used cell phones, direct landlines or aides' phones that bypassed the White House switchboard. An official review of the call logs found no missing pages.

And then there was this:

For one, sources told CNN that early January was a chaotic time inside the White House and that Trump was spending more time in the residence and conducting less official business.
According to one former Trump official, "all sense of normal order started to break down" and around early January, "the cracks were showing." While some people had been looking to find other jobs, others had been confused and it became "every man for himself," the former official added.

Dwarf,

Please stop trying to explain to me what is.

 
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:22 am

Dwarf,

Please stop trying to explain to me what is.


 

I accept your surrender.  

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:18 am

one of us likely sucks cock, Hank


 
I suspect it's the squealing little **** crushing on this fruit.

You're indusputably a **** idiot, boy.

He made clear that it was not his job to draw up an indictment.

There is no "crime of collusion".

What there is is a detailed narrative of Grifty's behavior, and a series of convictions.

There is nothing of the sort you lying dick sucker. If there was you would have posted a link

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:23 am

I accept your surrender.

How many times must your eager credulity, and perpetual inability to see the obvious, be demonstrated, Toady?

Post a number.
 

Hank » 03 Apr 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:26 am

There is nothing of the sort you lying dick sucker. If there was you would have posted a link

There are 500 pages of Mueller and 1000 of senate report, choad shocked imbecile.

If there wasn't why would the idiot have reason to obstruct?
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:18 am

one of us likely sucks cock, Hank


 
I suspect it's the squealing little **** crushing on this fruit.

You're indusputably a **** idiot, boy.

He made clear that it was not his job to draw up an indictment.

There is no "crime of collusion".

What there is is a detailed narrative of Grifty's behavior, and a series of convictions.

A series of convictions unrelated to Russian Collusion or coordination.  That was a bust.

As a matter of fact I believe that the only entity that has faced fines and legal troubles is the Clinton Campaign and the DNC:

 The Federal Election Commission has fined Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign $8,000 and the Democratic National Committee $105,000 for obscuring their funding of the "Steele dossier," a 2016 opposition research report that sought to highlight alleged links between Donald Trump and Russia.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-cl ... rongdoing/
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:27 am

How many times must your eager credulity, and perpetual inability to see the obvious, be demonstrated, Toady?

Post a number.

 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:29 am

There are 500 pages of Mueller and 1000 of senate report, choad shocked imbecile.

If there wasn't why would the idiot have reason to obstruct?

They didn't charge him with obstruction because  he wasn't obstructing any criminal wrong doings nutstain. 


Gosh you are dumb..


 

Hank » 03 Apr 2022, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:33 am

They didn't charge him with obstruction because  he wasn't obstructing any criminal wrong doings nutstain. 

Gosh you are dumb..

Who didn't?

**** moron
 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:31 am

By law, the president and White House officials are required to "adequately document" and maintain records of the president's "activities, deliberations, decisions, and policies." This responsibility was established in the Presidential Records Act of 1978. 

 Typically, a president's calls and actions throughout the day would be recorded in  the Presidential Daily Diary (PDD), a document compiled by White House diarists who rely on a variety of sources.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-janu ... aries-gap/

nod, ****.


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:34 am

Who didn't?

**** moron

He wasn't charged you ****.. 


 

Hank » 03 Apr 2022, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:39 am

He wasn't charged you ****..

Answer the question, **** cretin

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:37 am

By law, the president and White House officials are required to "adequately document" and maintain records of the president's "activities, deliberations, decisions, and policies." This responsibility was established in the Presidential Records Act of 1978. 

 Typically, a president's calls and actions throughout the day would be recorded in  the Presidential Daily Diary (PDD), a document compiled by White House diarists who rely on a variety of sources.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-janu ... aries-gap/

nod, ****.


 

It's tough to know what that change was. Was it intentional?" one source said. "You can only keep track of something when you know what's going on. When people don't share things with you, whether that was intentional and who decided that, I think it's a little murky at this point."

And:

The Presidential Records Act outlines that the office of the presidency has an obligation to adequately document activities of the president. But there is little to no enforcement mechanism to ensure the law is followed. While there are criminal consequences for the destruction of government records, there are none that penalize the failure to create them in the first place.

You get your face off the mat now.  Unless you show there was destruction of records no law was broken.

I still accept your surrender.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:39 am

Answer the question, **** cretin

What was the question cock breath? 

Hank » 03 Apr 2022, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:43 am

What was the question cock breath?

Scroll up, catamite.


 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:42 am

It's tough to know what that change was. Was it intentional?" one source said. "You can only keep track of something when you know what's going on. When people don't share things with you, whether that was intentional and who decided that, I think it's a little murky at this point."

And:

The Presidential Records Act outlines that the office of the presidency has an obligation to adequately document activities of the president. But there is little to no enforcement mechanism to ensure the law is followed. While there are criminal consequences for the destruction of government records, there are none that penalize the failure to create them in the first place.

You get your face off the mat now.  Unless you show there was destruction of records no law was broken.

I still accept your surrender.

Are these your words, DMA?

 That is NOT the missing phone log story.  Either intentionally or thru ignorance you conflating two separate issues

Just "yes", or "no".

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:43 am

Scroll up, catamite.

Don't tell me what to do Nancy..

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:45 am

Are these your words, DMA?

Just "yes", or "no".

Those are my words taken from this post:



1.  That is NOT the missing phone log story.  Either intentionally or thru ignorance you conflating two separate issues.

2.. This was Pointed out to you as well:

But sources close to the panel's investigation do not seem to know yet who, if anyone, directed a change in record-keeping or what the motivation behind that change was, raising questions about whether the lack of information was intentional or for staffing issues.

"It's tough to know what that change was. Was it intentional?" one source said. "You can only keep track of something when you know what's going on. When people don't share things with you, whether that was intentional and who decided that, I think it's a little murky at this point."

Then there is this:

CNN previously reported that a likely explanation for the gap in the phone log is that Trump used cell phones, direct landlines or aides' phones that bypassed the White House switchboard. An official review of the call logs found no missing pages.

And then there was this:

For one, sources told CNN that early January was a chaotic time inside the White House and that Trump was spending more time in the residence and conducting less official business.
According to one former Trump official, "all sense of normal order started to break down" and around early January, "the cracks were showing." While some people had been looking to find other jobs, others had been confused and it became "every man for himself," the former official added.

Now back to the fact that your are running from the FACT that unless you can prove diary record (NOT PHONE LOGS) were destroyed no law was broken.

Hank » 03 Apr 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:47 am

Don't tell me what to do Nancy..

Then go **** yourself, Hank.

Averting your eyes from your wounds doesn't mean you ain't leaving bleeding.

Hank » 03 Apr 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 10:47 am

Don't tell me what to do Nancy..

He does it to everyone.  He fancies himself a trial lawyer and demands yes or no answers.  Problem is he has watch too much Matlock and Perry Mason.

That is not how questioning goes in the real world.