Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:32 am

I already did.

Now I need you to stipulate to it.

It is another Objective Fact.

I accept your surrender.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:36 am

I accept your surrender.

There is no surrender but yours.

Stipulate to the objective fact, neverrun. Then we can move on.


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:37 am

There is no surrender but yours.

Stipulate to the objective fact, neverrun. Then we can move on.

Repost the specific facts you want acknowledged.  You post so much crap I am not sifting thru it.

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:40 am

Repost the specific facts you want acknowledged.  You post so much crap I am not sifting thru it.

Just scroll up...

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:28 am

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:25 am

That actually is the issue.  Of you wish you give us the narrative form of what you think the issue is and take a stand on it.

No..it isn't.

What is the January 6th Committe investigating, Dwarf?


 

 

 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:31 am

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:28 am

No..it isn't.

What is the January 6th Committe investigating, Dwarf?

you tell me and tie it to the discussion at hand.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:32 am

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:31 am

you tell me and tie it to the discussion at hand.

I already did.

Now I need you to stipulate to it.

It is another Objective Fact.
 

 

 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:36 am

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:32 am

I already did.

Now I need you to stipulate to it.

It is another Objective Fact.

I accept your surrender.

 

 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:40 am

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:37 am

There is no surrender but yours.

Stipulate to the objective fact, neverrun. Then we can move on.

Repost the specific facts you want acknowledged.  You post so much crap I am not sifting thru it.

 

QED

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:47 am

Just scroll up...

NO because you are **** liar

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:47 am

Just scroll up...

Too much to choose from.  If I choose wrong you will go on for days.  Just post what you think story and your stance on it. 

Tell you what.  Am I correct to assume you are talking about your Jan 6th 
post?

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:49 am

Too much to choose from.  If I choose wrong you will go on for days.  Just post what you think story and your stance on it. 

Tell you what.  Am I correct to assume you are talking about your Jan 6th 
post?

Dwarf,

I posted the record.

#readhissig


Stop yapping.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:49 am

QED

None of those posts tie this story to Jan 6th and the ramifications.  You were asked to provide a narrative and take a stance on these two stories.

you have failed to do so.  All you did is ask a question.

 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:25 am

That actually is the issue.  Of you wish you give us the narrative form of what you think the issue is and take a stand on it.

@Blackvegetable  

Waiting.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:50 am

Dwarf,

I posted the record.

#readhissig

Stop yapping.

And I replied to that post.

Read my sig.
 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:51 am

None of those posts tie this story to Jan 6th and the ramifications.  You were asked to provide a narrative and take a stance on these two stories.

you have failed to do so.  All you did is ask a question.

You were asked to stipulate to an objective fact.

If you lost track of the context it is only because you can't retain the lesson of #readhissig.

Just answer the question and all will be revealed.
 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:52 am

And I replied to that post.

Read my sig.

So what?
 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:53 am

You were asked to stipulate to an objective fact.

If you lost track of the context it is only because you can't retain the lesson of #readhissig.

Just answer the question and all will be revealed.

BV took lessons from willfranklin at being an asshole

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:52 am

@Blackvegetable  

Waiting.

No, you aren't.

It begins with you agreeing to an objective fact.


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:53 am

You were asked to stipulate to an objective fact.

If you lost track of the context it is only because you can't retain the lesson of #readhissig.

Just answer the question and all will be revealed.

When you post one I will.  Right now the only objective fact posted are from me

There is no evidence in either story that any law was broken.  The phone log story was fake news.  In the diarist story no record were destroyed.  

FJB » 03 Apr 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:54 am

BV took lessons from willfranklin at being an asshole

**** off, slack jaw..

I'm tossing The Dwarf.

Go wait for your gubmint check.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:55 am

No, you aren't.

It begins with you agreeing to an objective fact.

The only fact I acknowledge is both these stories are a by product of the Jan 6th commission.

Now take your stand, offer your narrative of why you are running from the stories you conflated, and acknowledge you were answered and no more questions will be entertained.

Or, I accept your surrender.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:28 am

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:25 am

That actually is the issue.  Of you wish you give us the narrative form of what you think the issue is and take a stand on it.

No..it isn't.

What is the January 6th Committe investigating, Dwarf?


 

 

 

Huey » 03 Apr 2022, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:55 am

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:53 am

You were asked to stipulate to an objective fact.

If you lost track of the context it is only because you can't retain the lesson of #readhissig.

Just answer the question and all will be revealed.

When you post one I will.  Right now the only objective fact posted are from me

There is no evidence in either story that any law was broken.  The phone log story was fake news.  In the diarist story no record were destroyed.  

 

Now stop with the blackout stupid ****, and just answer.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2022, 11:57 am

Now stop with the blackout stupid ****, and just answer.

Read my last post.