Liberal Forum

I think it might help people understand who is male or female if we do a crash course on what biological sex actually is and why it came about. 

First of all it is not limited to humans. Many life forms do have a biological sex. And all of them have 2 sexes, like humans. 

Asexual reproduction worked fine for billions of years...and still works for rather simple organisms. 

But asexual reproduction has a downside: it is basically a clone. Therefore a species will change extremely slowly with asexual reproduction which may be a good thing if it's survival strategy is simple and not much hurt by changes in circumstance...but is bad as a species becomes more complex and tries to exist in a particular ecological niche that is subject to change. 

The arms race therefore that initiated between predator and prey in the history of life resulted in the Cambrian explosion and also made greater genetic diversity imperative. 

Biological sex evolved as a way to provide this. Despite making reproduction more difficult...it does introduce a massive amount of genetic diversity...because the lifeform receives half the DNA from one parent and half from the other. 

The closer 2 parents are to each other genetically the closer the reproduction is to cloning. It also results in 'inbreeding depression' thay leftists love to accuse white people of. But there is also the opposite issue called 'outbreeding depression' which is that if the parents are very different genetically than any fine tuning their genes may have had is lost when they reproduce and their offspring is not particularly adapted to anything at all. 

it is very difficult to imagine why a third sex would ever be introduced because that wouldnonly make reproduction even more difficult while providing no extra amount of genetic diversity...it would still be a question of how genetically close the 3 sexes are... 

therefore even if we found some alien life form that also engaged I sexual reproduction logically we could assume they only have 2 sexes. A third sex would have no reason to evolve because it has no advantage. 
 

FOS » 04 Apr 2022, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 4:44 pm

I think it might help people understand who is male or female if we do a crash course on what biological sex actually is and why it came about. 

First of all it is not limited to humans. Many life forms do have a biological sex. And all of them have 2 sexes, like humans. 

Asexual reproduction worked fine for billions of years...and still works for rather simple organisms. 

But asexual reproduction has a downside: it is basically a clone. Therefore a species will change extremely slowly with asexual reproduction which may be a good thing if it's survival strategy is simple and not much hurt by changes in circumstance...but is bad as a species becomes more complex and tries to exist in a particular ecological niche that is subject to change. 

The arms race therefore that initiated between predator and prey in the history of life resulted in the Cambrian explosion and also made greater genetic diversity imperative. 

Biological sex evolved as a way to provide this. Despite making reproduction more difficult...it does introduce a massive amount of genetic diversity...because the lifeform receives half the DNA from one parent and half from the other. 

The closer 2 parents are to each other genetically the closer the reproduction is to cloning. It also results in 'inbreeding depression' thay leftists love to accuse white people of. But there is also the opposite issue called 'outbreeding depression' which is that if the parents are very different genetically than any fine tuning their genes may have had is lost when they reproduce and their offspring is not particularly adapted to anything at all. 

it is very difficult to imagine why a third sex would ever be introduced because that wouldnonly make reproduction even more difficult while providing no extra amount of genetic diversity...it would still be a question of how genetically close the 3 sexes are... 

therefore even if we found some alien life form that also engaged I sexual reproduction logically we could assume they only have 2 sexes. A third sex would have no reason to evolve because it has no advantage.

Dude, I while I appreciate your effort to educate the left, this is way too advanced for them. I recall once bringing up how humans aren't the only lifeforms that contain male and female. It blew their **** mind. I even asked them if any of the animals may be confused during mating season if it was possible that they were confused about genders. How is it that animals seem to not be confused about this, but humans tend to be? 

Vegas » 04 Apr 2022, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:00 pm

Dude, I while I appreciate your effort to educate the left, this is way too advanced for them. I recall once bringing up how humans aren't the only lifeforms that contain male and female. It blew their **** mind. I even asked them if any of the animals may be confused during mating season if it was possible that they were confused about genders. How is it that animals seem to not be confused about this, but humans tend to be?

My target audience is non leftist generally confused people
 

All I know is; Sex was a lot more fun when it was "dirty"!  
And I was never confused about what hole to put it in, either.      
 

nuckinfutz » 04 Apr 2022, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:23 pm

All I know is; Sex was a lot more fun when it was "dirty"!  
And I was never confused about what hole to put it in, either.    

Thanks for the inspired contribution. 

Indeed the left is mostly concerned with their individual fetish with sex and not with any survival of any species or stuff like that. 

They are a very pleasure focused shallow people.
 

FOS » 04 Apr 2022, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:25 pm

Thanks for the inspired contribution. 

Indeed the left is mostly concerned with their individual fetish with sex and not with any survival of any species or stuff like that. 

They are a very pleasure focused shallow people.

Is there something wrong with 'sport ****'?
Does it always have to end with babies? Ugh!  
@FOS  
 

nuckinfutz » 04 Apr 2022, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:35 pm

Is there something wrong with 'sport ****'?
Does it always have to end with babies? Ugh!  
@FOS  

what exactly is sport ****?

What advantage does it have over jerking off?

FOS » 04 Apr 2022, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:50 pm

what exactly is sport ****?

What advantage does it have over jerking off?

Dear Ann Landers - 

None whatsoever.

Signed, 

Retired sport ****. 

FOS » 04 Apr 2022, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:50 pm

what exactly is sport ****?

What advantage does it have over jerking off?

Jerking off is not objective. And does not satisfy the womb crying out for love!      
 

nuckinfutz » 04 Apr 2022, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:59 pm

Jerking off is not objective. And does not satisfy the womb crying out for love!    

you mean a womb wanting to reproduce? Or what.

Not sure what that means, but I got a prostate, penis and 2 testicles between my legs.

Not sure what that makes me in woke 2022

nuckinfutz » 04 Apr 2022, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:59 pm

Jerking off is not objective. And does not satisfy the womb crying out for love!    

Let me be real with you. 

I have **** a lot of women. 

And occasionally some of those women would do some 4 am call to me crying about how they wanted babies. they considered me some genetic masterpiece and they want my babies.

And I was sitting there thinking look...I only **** you cause you have amazing tits. But. Just like you consider me a genetic masterpiece...you overall are a genetic loser...except tits. And I don't want genetically inferior versions of myself running around. 

So what do you eventually say to a big titled girl who calls you you genetic masterpiece?? Do you call them genetically inferior?

The answer is yes. Eventually you get sick of sugar coating that ****. 
 

Vegas » 04 Apr 2022, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:00 pm

Dude, I while I appreciate your effort to educate the left, this is way too advanced for them. I recall once bringing up how humans aren't the only lifeforms that contain male and female. It blew their **** mind. I even asked them if any of the animals may be confused during mating season if it was possible that they were confused about genders. How is it that animals seem to not be confused about this, but humans tend to be?

I bet 99.95% of people aren't confused by gender either. Some 30% are taken hostage and the rest seem too apathetic to fight. 


 
 

FOS » 04 Apr 2022, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 4:44 pm

I think it might help people understand who is male or female if we do a crash course on what biological sex actually is and why it came about. 

First of all it is not limited to humans. Many life forms do have a biological sex. And all of them have 2 sexes, like humans. 

Asexual reproduction worked fine for billions of years...and still works for rather simple organisms. 

But asexual reproduction has a downside: it is basically a clone. Therefore a species will change extremely slowly with asexual reproduction which may be a good thing if it's survival strategy is simple and not much hurt by changes in circumstance...but is bad as a species becomes more complex and tries to exist in a particular ecological niche that is subject to change. 

The arms race therefore that initiated between predator and prey in the history of life resulted in the Cambrian explosion and also made greater genetic diversity imperative. 

Biological sex evolved as a way to provide this. Despite making reproduction more difficult...it does introduce a massive amount of genetic diversity...because the lifeform receives half the DNA from one parent and half from the other. 

The closer 2 parents are to each other genetically the closer the reproduction is to cloning. It also results in 'inbreeding depression' thay leftists love to accuse white people of. But there is also the opposite issue called 'outbreeding depression' which is that if the parents are very different genetically than any fine tuning their genes may have had is lost when they reproduce and their offspring is not particularly adapted to anything at all. 

it is very difficult to imagine why a third sex would ever be introduced because that wouldnonly make reproduction even more difficult while providing no extra amount of genetic diversity...it would still be a question of how genetically close the 3 sexes are... 

therefore even if we found some alien life form that also engaged I sexual reproduction logically we could assume they only have 2 sexes. A third sex would have no reason to evolve because it has no advantage.

Also, what would a third party bring to the table that would enhance or benefit procreation...
 

Neo » 04 Apr 2022, 8:14 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 8:14 pm

I bet 99.95% of people aren't confused by gender either. Some 30% are taken hostage and the rest seem too apathetic to fight. 

It isn't complicated 

FOS » 04 Apr 2022, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:25 pm

Thanks for the inspired contribution. 

Indeed the left is mostly concerned with their individual fetish with sex and not with any survival of any species or stuff like that. 

They are a very pleasure focused shallow people.

By your very nature, you prove that the Right is about control, authoritarianism and hegemony.  
 

ScottMon » 04 Apr 2022, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 9:06 pm

By your very nature, you prove that the Right is about control, authoritarianism and hegemony.

hogwash. there is nothing more controlling than to make people question their own gender/identity and to conform to the new identity you establish for them, either a person of of the opposite sex or a completely gender neutral being.
 

ScottMon » 04 Apr 2022, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 9:06 pm

By your very nature, you prove that the Right is about control, authoritarianism and hegemony.

What even makes me right wing?

I actually think i agree with leftists about control.im just on a different team.
 
I unironically respect Stalin. 

I unironicallt respect Pol pot. 

What makes me different? 

I'm white. 

Please espain to me 
 

ScottMon » 04 Apr 2022, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 9:06 pm

By your very nature, you prove that the Right is about control, authoritarianism and hegemony.

Taking advantage of children's credulity is pretty **** authoritarian, fruity.

Cannonpointer » 04 Apr 2022, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2022, 7:55 pm

Dear Ann Landers - 

None whatsoever.

Signed, 

Retired sport ****.

And 'beating cop'!