U ****-FOR-BRAINS GUN FREAKS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MORE DEATHS THAN ALL OF THE NUKES IN THEZeets2 » 02 Jun 2022, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑ So let me get this straight. You really think that criminals or someone mentally unstable enough to plan a mass murder would FOLLOW A LAW, or be SO incompetent that they wouldn't be able to obtain one ILLEGALLY?!?!? Please God, tell me YOU'RE NOT THAT DUMB!
And exactly WHEN did an AR-15 or ANY rifle get elevated inside your warped mind to the point they too can be called a "weapon of mass destruction", just like a nuclear bomb, chemical, or a biological WMD's? Beyond that, I think it's well past time that you educate your stupid self to how despotic rulers throughout history first rounded up all the gun from the populace before installing their dictatorship, and just maybe you'll derive the reasons that our Founding Fathers made the right to bear arms the second-most important necessity in our Constitution, right after our freedom of speech!
Look at it this way, fool! The world is your oyster! You can pick ANY ONE of over a hundred countries who DO NOT allow their citizenry to own guns!
Pick one, and take as many liberals who are as dumb as you with them!
And one last thing, ****! I don't share my thoughts with you or humiliate you in order to convince someone so ignorant to change your mind! I do it so that others who are able to think clearly and logically who have working brains will know that THEY ARE NOT ALONE!
And all while ignorant liberal dopes like you have continued to pile on new laws and new restrictions throughout those years, haven't you?supraTruth » 03 Jun 2022, 2:47 am » wrote: ↑ U ****-FOR-BRAINS GUN FREAKS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MORE DEATHS THAN ALL OF THE NUKES IN THEIN THE LAST 76 YEARS!

It doesn't take much of an effort to be smarter than all these dumb liberals here, but thanks for the compliment!
Well, I am honored to have such a profound impact on your dog.Zeets2 » 03 Jun 2022, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ Some days, it seems that only my dog and my wife agree with you!
Skans » 03 Jun 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ Well, I am honored to have such a profound impact on your dog.
Okay... wow. You GENUINELY think guns aren't inanimate objects? You think they're.... what? Infused with demonic spirits?? How delusional are you?supraTruth » 01 Jun 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ No, a deranged mind is a PISS ANT who calls a gun an "inanimate object." DROP 1 & SEE HOW "inanimate" it is.
U say U didn't vote for theFart, so WHO did U vote for?
I'll pass. I am very confident that I'll never need a gun. If someone wants to kill me, If they're half smart about it, They'll succeed.Skans » 05 Apr 2022, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Black Guns Matter. They are what stand between you and a criminal who wants your car, gold, money, watch, wife, daughter and your blood. Exercise your 2nd Amendment Right and buy Black Guns that are better than those issued to the US Military.
Suggestions? Here's my Black Gun suggestion: Desert Tech MDR .308.
Wow. I feel sorry for your family, if you have one.ScottMon » 03 Jun 2022, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll pass. I am very confident that I'll never need a gun. If someone wants to kill me, If they're half smart about it, They'll succeed.
I live in a very nice neighborhood. Quiet. No violence. Just elderly folks. However, I do love live music and if I were to attend one like those folks did in LA, I'm a sitting duck. That guy killed 58 people from a hotel room. No way to eliminate all soft targets and having a gun is unlikely to save my life as per statistics.
Then die. You aren't my problem **** off and die.ScottMon » 03 Jun 2022, 9:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I live in a very nice neighborhood. Quiet. No violence. Just elderly folks. However, I do love live music and if I were to attend one like those folks did in LA, I'm a sitting duck. That guy killed 58 people from a hotel room. No way to eliminate all soft targets and having a gun is unlikely to save my life as per statistics.
Don't you have the Illumanti to blame? Some crazed manfesto to type up?
It is spelled manifesto you **** moron.ScottMon » 03 Jun 2022, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't you have the Illumanti to blame? Some crazed manfesto to type up?
I live in about as perfect an area as I could ever hope to: off the beaten path in a rural area, my only neighbors wildlife and like-minded, self-reliant friends. Casual looky-loos just don't come out here unless they're hopelessly lost.ScottMon » 03 Jun 2022, 9:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I live in a very nice neighborhood. Quiet. No violence. Just elderly folks. However, I do love live music and if I were to attend one like those folks did in LA, I'm a sitting duck. That guy killed 58 people from a hotel room. No way to eliminate all soft targets and having a gun is unlikely to save my life as per statistics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2A8i-amTmYSkans » 05 Apr 2022, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Black Guns Matter. They are what stand between you and a criminal who wants your car, gold, money, watch, wife, daughter and your blood. Exercise your 2nd Amendment Right and buy Black Guns that are better than those issued to the US Military.
Suggestions? Here's my Black Gun suggestion: Desert Tech MDR .308.
Spartan, You've always been a good guy. I don't agree with some of your points but I respect you completely.Spartan » 04 Jun 2022, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑
But... I have to remind myself it's not my place to tell anyone else how to live their life. My biggest complaint about gun controllers is that I'm fine with them making the choice to NOT own guns; where I get irritated is their desire to not only tell me how my choice is wrong, but how I should be forbidden from making my own choice on the matter. But, then I realize that sometimes I get in your face too much, and imply that YOU shouldn't be able to make a different choice than ME... and I apologize for that.
Thankfully people like you were in short supply during our Revolutionary War period.ScottMon » 04 Jun 2022, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Spartan, You've always been a good guy. I don't agree with some of your points but I respect you completely.
Anyhow, I want to solve the problem. Penalizing law abiding gun owners isn't going to solve the problem.
Thank you, Scott. Right back at you.ScottMon » 04 Jun 2022, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Spartan, You've always been a good guy. I don't agree with some of your points but I respect you completely.
Anyhow, I want to solve the problem. Penalizing law abiding gun owners isn't going to solve the problem.
The EXPIRED Assault Weapons ban reduced mass shootings.Zeets2 » 03 Jun 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑ And all while ignorant liberal dopes like you have continued to pile on new laws and new restrictions throughout those years, haven't you?
Are you even interested in the result of all that effort, or do RESULTS not make a difference to libs as dumb as you? You **** idiots installed a demented president who was so careless with guns that he armed the terrorists in the Taliban with over $80 BILLION worth of guns and high-grade military weapons, so I will NOT be lectured by the likes of you OR HIM wanting to take away MY singular LEGAL gun that I have for the personal protection of me and my family! If it doesn't bother you in the slightest that you put the entire US stockpile of nuclear weapons in the hands of a babbling Alzheimer's patient who **** himself and can't put together a comprehensive sentence, then all you have to do is take a look at what good your THOUSANDS of gun laws you demanded have actually done.
Read it and weep, dickhead!:



STAY IN CANADA & OUT OF OUR U.S. POLITICS, NAZI PUNK!
OK, so I'll put the same question to ANOTHER ignorant pollyanna liberal. WHAT IS IT THAT MAKES A LIBERAL LIKE YOU THINK THAT CRIMINALS WILL OBEY THOSE GREAT NEW REGULATIONS THAT YOU STUPIDLY BELIEVE WILL STOP GUN VIOLENCE?supraTruth » 05 Jun 2022, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The EXPIRED Assault Weapons ban reduced mass shootings.
High density cities are packed with poor people witout jobs or hope, & IT IS ALWAYS U RNC PISS ANTS WHO ENSURE that their gangs can get HIGH POWERED LONG GUNS, WITH HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES, FROM OTHER STATES to fight their turf wars!
Studies Find No Evidence That Assault Weapon Bans Reduce Homicide Rates
The studies, data, and examination of the available evidence by scholars suggest that assault weapon bans or buybacks will have little if any effect on rates of violent crime and gun violence.
Saturday, August 17, 2019
Between 1994 and 2004, the federal government banned the manufacture, sale, or transfer of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines. A subsequent Department of Justice study found no evidence that the ban had had any effect on gun violence and stated that “should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement.”
A recent study published this year in the Journal of General Internal Medicine examined state gun control policies and found no statistically significant relationship between assault weapon or large-capacity magazine bans and homicide rates. A Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) study came to the same conclusion.