Yeah, I've been banned on almost every one of his threads also, but as incompetent as liberals are, he left that one open for me to give him a final kick in the ***, which was certainly warranted!Buffalo » 21 Sep 2022, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ Although, he has me banned and on ignore, I still have to see him crapping all over the forum...
B.See » 25 Aug 2022, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ Right. I'm the racist for calling out police misconduct while YOU dishonestly try to put words in my mouth by substituting your OWN sick **** racism and posting it as if it were a DIRECT QUOTE.
No surprise THERE, you unscrupulous pos.
He's too submersed in the communist ideology to even recognize how that's precisely the action any Marxist dictator would take, and he's too blind to grasp that reality.Buffalo » 21 Sep 2022, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ Although, he has me banned and on ignore, I still have to see him crapping all over the forum...
B.See » 06 Apr 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ Y'know, I don't have anything against cops, generally speaking. Fact is (like I've written before) I know cops, have or have had friends and family members on the force. And as such I've been privy to some rather off the record tableside tales.
I know they are needed to rein in the criminal element, to protect and serve, to establish a relative sense of safety and order, and I believe most of them are trying to do JUST THAT as best they can.
However, that being said, I believe that cops often have the option to respond to situations in a number of ways, some more lethal and some LESS so. I believe HOW they respond has TOO OFTEN been determined not so much by the situation at hand, but by WHO is involved. And numerous studies by groups and individuals far more knowledgeable than I on the subject have concluded LIKEWISE.
When cops (more often than not) show restraint for some but not for others, there develops within the community a perception of disparity in law enforcement. Furthermore, when cops treat certain members of the community in a disparate fashion, when they over react by using lethal force where none was needed,
when they seek to cover it up, lie about what happened, demean the victim, and employ a code of silence between them, their supervisors, and their union in defense of MISCONDUCT, they do a DISSERVICE to the badge they wear, the oath they've sworn, and the community they're supposed to "protect and serve."
In this thread I'll be posting about questionable actions on the part of law enforcement. And hopefully some inspiring moments as well.
This is one I've shown you before, more than once - and you never responded. The issue never got splashed across teevee screens, because the victim was the wrong color. You never responded - for the same reason. The victim is the wrong color, so the abuse is not important.B.See » 06 Apr 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ Y'know, I don't have anything against cops, generally speaking. Fact is (like I've written before) I know cops, have or have had friends and family members on the force. And as such I've been privy to some rather off the record tableside tales.
I know they are needed to rein in the criminal element, to protect and serve, to establish a relative sense of safety and order, and I believe most of them are trying to do JUST THAT as best they can.
However, that being said, I believe that cops often have the option to respond to situations in a number of ways, some more lethal and some LESS so. I believe HOW they respond has TOO OFTEN been determined not so much by the situation at hand, but by WHO is involved. And numerous studies by groups and individuals far more knowledgeable than I on the subject have concluded LIKEWISE.
When cops (more often than not) show restraint for some but not for others, there develops within the community a perception of disparity in law enforcement. Furthermore, when cops treat certain members of the community in a disparate fashion, when they over react by using lethal force where none was needed,
when they seek to cover it up, lie about what happened, demean the victim, and employ a code of silence between them, their supervisors, and their union in defense of MISCONDUCT, they do a DISSERVICE to the badge they wear, the oath they've sworn, and the community they're supposed to "protect and serve."
In this thread I'll be posting about questionable actions on the part of law enforcement. And hopefully some inspiring moments
I didn't respond because I accepted it as yet another example of police misconduct. I certainly didn't DENY it.Cannonpointer » 21 Sep 2022, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ This is one I've shown you before, more than once - and you never responded. The issue never got splashed across teevee screens, because the victim was the wrong color. You never responded - for the same reason. The victim is the wrong color, so the abuse is not important.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tImY5Nj2kek
Yes yes - it's all a misunderstanding. You are AGAINST police misconduct. And bully for you, on that score - very liberal of you.B.See » 22 Sep 2022, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't respond because I accepted it as yet another example of police misconduct. I certainly didn't DENY it.
And if you READ the stories in my second to last post above, you'll find that TWO of those stories involve white victims of police misconduct.
So your assumption that I IGNORE police misconduct against white individuals is DEAD WRONG.
B.See » 25 Aug 2022, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ Right. I'm the racist for calling out police misconduct while YOU dishonestly try to put words in my mouth by substituting your OWN sick **** racism and posting it as if it were a DIRECT QUOTE.
No surprise THERE, you unscrupulous pos.
Well, hey I TRIED to respond to you, and with civility, but no, YOU have to resort to name calling, ASSumptions, mischaracterizations, and YOUR racist ****. Which is always a laugh getting called a racist by a **** BIGOT. So, GO **** YOURSELF.Cannonpointer » 22 Sep 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes yes - it's all a misunderstanding. You are AGAINST police misconduct. And bully for you, on that score - very liberal of you.
But we both know why you are ducking the issue, fruity.
The issue I am raising - as you well know, dancer - is that if the fellow getting his balls tased were BLACK, your media would have you out burning cities, you **** racist fruitcake. Since he is merely WHITE, you mumble platitudes - but only when pushed repeatedly.
Just IMAGINE the hay you would be making, if you could find a single mistreated gorilla in the mist who wasn't acting like a jungle animal when the police went too far. Just imagine how hysterical you would be if the fellow getting his balls tased were a **** skin. We would have that rubbed in our faces by you racist pieces of **** 24/7/365. Hell, even when the delanamores are sitting pretty and begging for it, we have to watch the cops give it to 'em 80 times a day.
B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ Well, hey I TRIED to respond to you, and with civility, but no, YOU have to resort to name calling, ASSumptions, mischaracterizations, and YOUR racist ****. Which is always a laugh getting called a racist by a **** BIGOT. So, GO **** YOURSELF.
What r u? His dk sucker? Actually I AM laughing, because you fascists never fail to miss ANY opportunity to show the rest of the world WHO AND WHAT YOU ARE.roadkill » 23 Sep 2022, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ "Which is always a laugh getting called a racist by a **** BIGOT."
Then why aren't you laughing?
Actually yer showing the world who you are. You can't get a date.B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑ What r u? His dk sucker? Actually I AM laughing, because you fascists never fail to miss ANY opportunity to show the rest of the world WHO AND WHAT YOU ARE.
B.See isn't laughing when people call him a TROLL either... he doesn't have a sense of humor...roadkill » 23 Sep 2022, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ "Which is always a laugh getting called a racist by a **** BIGOT."
Then why aren't you laughing?
Jantje_Smit » 23 Sep 2022, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ B.See isn't laughing when people call him a TROLL either... he doesn't have a sense of humor...
Yes, you TRIED to weasel and duck the issue I raised after the third time I raised it.
Exactly, fruit cake.
Cannonpointer » 23 Sep 2022, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, you TRIED to weasel and duck the issue I raised after the third time I raised it.
Exactly, fruit cake.
B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ Look CLOWN. For every ONE story on this topic I post there are at least two more, that I DELIBERATELY skip because they may not be clear cut cases of misconduct. MUCH of what I post has not only been questioned by observers, eye witness account, and/or video evidence, but OFTEN are based upon determinations and charges made by THE COURTS AND EVEN POLICE DEPARTMENTS THEMSELVES.
But thanks for trying to MISCHARACTERIZE IT ANYWAY, in your typically bigoted fashion.
Also thanks for reminding me why I USUALLY IGNORE YOUR ***.

You done, retard?B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ Look CLOWN. For every ONE story on this topic I post there are at least two more, that I DELIBERATELY skip because they may not be clear cut cases of misconduct. MUCH of what I post has not only been questioned by observers, eye witness account, and/or video evidence, but OFTEN are based upon determinations and charges made by THE COURTS AND EVEN POLICE DEPARTMENTS THEMSELVES.
But thanks for trying to MISCHARACTERIZE IT ANYWAY, in your typically bigoted fashion.
Also thanks for reminding me why I USUALLY IGNORE YOUR ***.
Pardon me? I am a fascist. Is there some reason I should hide that?B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑ What r u? His dk sucker? Actually I AM laughing, because you fascists never fail to miss ANY opportunity to show the rest of the world WHO AND WHAT YOU ARE.