You are naive.
You are anti-authority
I'm not. I have an honorable discharge from the military where I had no problem with authority. The cops do not follow the rules they lie all the time. It's just a fact.
What branch?slideman » 06 Apr 2022, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not. I have an honorable discharge from the military where I had no problem with authority. The cops do not follow the rules they lie all the time. It's just a fact.
Navy
you really loathe what limits your time to existing here only evolving as one of a kind. you are a despot to command doubt forward come hell or high water.B.See » 06 Apr 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ Y'know, I don't have anything against cops, generally speaking. Fact is (like I've written before) I know cops, have or have had friends and family members on the force. And as such I've been privy to some rather off the record tableside tales.
I know they are needed to rein in the criminal element, to protect and serve, to establish a relative sense of safety and order, and I believe most of them are trying to do JUST THAT as best they can.
However, that being said, I believe that cops often have the option to respond to situations in a number of ways, some more lethal and some LESS so. I believe HOW they respond has TOO OFTEN been determined not so much by the situation at hand, but by WHO is involved. And numerous studies by groups and individuals far more knowledgeable than I on the subject have concluded LIKEWISE.
When cops (more often than not) show restraint for some but not for others, there develops within the community a perception of disparity in law enforcement. Furthermore, when cops treat certain members of the community in a disparate fashion, when they over react by using lethal force where none was needed,
when they seek to cover it up, lie about what happened, demean the victim, and employ a code of silence between them, their supervisors, and their union in defense of MISCONDUCT, they do a DISSERVICE to the badge they wear, the oath they've sworn, and the community they're supposed to "protect and serve."
In this thread I'll be posting about questionable actions on the part of law enforcement. And hopefully some inspiring moments as well.
Makes sense. Navy and air force **** out the most leftist progs than the others.slideman » 06 Apr 2022, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Navy
Believe me I had to accept authority and at times it was difficult but I did.
You just implied I was a piece of **** why don't you go **** yourselfWarcok » 06 Apr 2022, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Makes sense. Navy and air force **** out the most leftist progs than the others.
what was your MOS?
Obey the law. **** libsslideman » 06 Apr 2022, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Our Police Embrace Deceit. Is It Any Wonder We Don’t Trust Them?
https://www.cato.org/blog/our-police-em ... trust-them
Calm down, buttshark, I'm not calling you a pos it's just a term I use when something produces something.slideman » 06 Apr 2022, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You just implied I was a piece of **** why don't you go **** yourself
You have a problem with authority whether you realize it or notslideman » 06 Apr 2022, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Truth or Consequences: Police "Testilying"
Jon Loevy
Litigation
Vol. 36, No. 3, TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES (Spring 2010), pp. 13-20 (8 pages)
Published By: American Bar Association
https://www.jstor.org/stable/29760781
No I have a problem with liars.Warcok » 06 Apr 2022, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You have a problem with authority whether you realize it or not
Then you're admitting to having a problem with Lyin' Biden and his entire administration ✌
Here's one. It's the police tazing a man's testicles in front of his children.B.See » 06 Apr 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ Y'know, I don't have anything against cops, generally speaking. Fact is (like I've written before) I know cops, have or have had friends and family members on the force. And as such I've been privy to some rather off the record tableside tales.
I know they are needed to rein in the criminal element, to protect and serve, to establish a relative sense of safety and order, and I believe most of them are trying to do JUST THAT as best they can.
However, that being said, I believe that cops often have the option to respond to situations in a number of ways, some more lethal and some LESS so. I believe HOW they respond has TOO OFTEN been determined not so much by the situation at hand, but by WHO is involved. And numerous studies by groups and individuals far more knowledgeable than I on the subject have concluded LIKEWISE.
When cops (more often than not) show restraint for some but not for others, there develops within the community a perception of disparity in law enforcement. Furthermore, when cops treat certain members of the community in a disparate fashion, when they over react by using lethal force where none was needed,
when they seek to cover it up, lie about what happened, demean the victim, and employ a code of silence between them, their supervisors, and their union in defense of MISCONDUCT, they do a DISSERVICE to the badge they wear, the oath they've sworn, and the community they're supposed to "protect and serve."
In this thread I'll be posting about questionable actions on the part of law enforcement. And hopefully some inspiring moments as well.
slideman » 06 Apr 2022, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Our Police Embrace Deceit. Is It Any Wonder We Don’t Trust Them?
https://www.cato.org/blog/our-police-em ... trust-them