Cannonpointer » 23 Sep 2022, 11:11 pm » wrote: ↑ IF THIS GUY WERE BLACK, CITIES WOULD HAVE BURNED:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-2jrkrkOFE
B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 11:14 pm » wrote: ↑ You're the fkng DANCER, ese. And a fraudulent one at that.
Tell me this, asshole, with all the police misconduct I've posted, NOT counting the many I HAVEN'T, WHY AREN'T PEOPLE OUT "BURNING CITIES" as your ignorant *** is suggesting they would??
Fact is, the only **** "gorillas" acting like "jungle animals" are you **** "victim" MAGATS who tried to storm this nation's CAPITOL and pull off a political COUP because your loser *** fascist "king" got his *** KICKED AT THE VOTING BOOTH.
bitch.
Right. Says the RACIST sack of ****. Remind us again of all those HATEFUL RACIST EPITHETS YOU like to throw around here, mr. "not a racist."Cannonpointer » 23 Sep 2022, 11:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Lying sack of ****.
What you have done is duck the issue - because you are one of the worst race baiters on this board.
Cannonpointer » 23 Sep 2022, 11:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Her media are, too. They cherry pick anything they can POSSIBLY find with blacks in it - and pass on anything with whites in it.
If they had anything CLOSE to the vids I just posted in this thread, featuring NEGRO victims? Man they would have cities set ABLAZE!
B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Right. Says the RACIST sack of ****. Remind us again of all those HATEFUL RACIST EPITHETS YOU like to throw around here, mr. "not a racist."
B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Right. Says the RACIST sack of ****. Remind us again of all those HATEFUL RACIST EPITHETS YOU like to throw around here, mr. "not a racist."
Yeah... wear that hood PROUDLY, scum. Oh... and did I mention, GO **** YOURSELF?Cannonpointer » 23 Sep 2022, 11:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Where did I say that I was not a racist, fruitcake?
Pieces of **** like you fly false flags - don't project your cowardice onto me.
Cannonpointer » 23 Sep 2022, 11:37 pm » wrote: ↑ There is more video now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYeTpbY0__Y
B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah... wear that hood PROUDLY, scum. Oh... and did I mention, GO **** YOURSELF?
B.See » 23 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah... wear that hood PROUDLY, scum. Oh... and did I mention, GO **** YOURSELF?
The race pimping is growing more wordy - the fruitcake is tired of being outed.B.See » 06 Apr 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ However, that being said, I believe that cops often have the option to respond to situations in a number of ways, some more lethal and some LESS so. I believe HOW they respond has TOO OFTEN been determined not so much by the situation at hand, but by WHO is involved. And numerous studies by groups and individuals far more knowledgeable than I on the subject have concluded LIKEWISE.
See how cagey he's getting? He's tired of having his *** kicked...B.See » 06 Apr 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑When cops (more often than not) show restraint for some but not for others, there develops within the community a perception of disparity in law enforcement.
Reckon fruity means white folks?B.See » 06 Apr 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑Furthermore, when cops treat certain members of the community in a disparate fashion, when they over react by using lethal force where none was needed,
Yeah, I'm the "racist dirtbag" for posting about police misconduct, but not about enough police misconduct perpetrated upon white people, not enough to the liking of the pos who defends police misconduct while using terms like "gorilla" "jungle ape" etc. to refer to black people.Cannonpointer » 23 Sep 2022, 11:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Did I mention you just got outed, racist dirtbag?
I've busted you out in the past, fruity pebbles. Don't think I've forgotten.
Your pretense that police brutality is a RACIAL issue is just race-pimping - and I can post the video proof all **** day, Laquishia.
Fruitcake runs this big long screed intended to single out a particular group that she claims are mistreated more often by cops. In the past, fruitcake had the nerve to NAME that group - but after several beatings on the topic, fruitcake is resorting to dog whistles.B.See » 06 Apr 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑
However, that being said, I believe that cops often have the option to respond to situations in a number of ways, some more lethal and some LESS so. I believe HOW they respond has TOO OFTEN been determined not so much by the situation at hand, but by WHO is involved. And numerous studies by groups and individuals far more knowledgeable than I on the subject have concluded LIKEWISE.
When cops (more often than not) show restraint for some but not for others, there develops within the community a perception of disparity in law enforcement. Furthermore, when cops treat certain members of the community in a disparate fashion, when they over react by using lethal force where none was needed,
when they seek to cover it up, lie about what happened, demean the victim, and employ a code of silence between them, their supervisors, and their union in defense of MISCONDUCT, they do a DISSERVICE to the badge they wear, the oath they've sworn, and the community they're supposed to "protect and serve."
In this thread I'll be posting about questionable actions on the part of law enforcement. And hopefully some inspiring moments as well.
You wrote your OP very carefully, fruity.B.See » 24 Sep 2022, 12:12 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, I'm the "racist dirtbag" for posting about police misconduct, but not about enough police misconduct perpetrated upon white people,
Cannonpointer » 24 Sep 2022, 12:11 am » wrote: ↑ The race pimping is growing more wordy - the fruitcake is tired of being outed.
See how cagey he's getting? He's tired of having his *** kicked...
Reckon fruity means white folks?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKMSUaFXsw8
SJConspirator » 24 Sep 2022, 12:26 am » wrote: ↑ that story is bizarre. Those cops must be REALLY bored in that town
You're damned RIGHT I did, fruity. I chose the words and the subject CAREFULLY... AS I DO EVERY WORD I TYPE - and I stand by EVERY **** WORD OF IT.Cannonpointer » 24 Sep 2022, 12:24 am » wrote: ↑ You wrote your OP very carefully, fruity.
You chose your words.
You chose your subject.
You made it about "a certain group" who ALLEGEDLY receive disparate treatment - are more often and more egregiously brutalized.
And you just got your *** handed to you - again.
I can go all day, fruity. For every brutalization of blacks, I can show WORSE against whites - proving that your OP is ****.
You chose to focus the OP on dividing us up on the issue, rather than uniting us, pretending the police are singling out minorities - not I.
I chose to prove you are a lying piece of ****. I think I've done a bang up job, fruity.