Liberal Forum

Deezer Shoove » 12 Apr 2022, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 10:29 pm

Not everyone. I'm different.

when is it I don't say everyone is unique because biology eternally separates ancestors conceived to decomposed here after conceived and until decomposed life cycle is complete.

I constantly keep saying it only exists mutually evolving now and everyone else believes living is only taking place intellectually typecasting everything universally balancing into a new total sum now.

Natural justice vs human intellectual social justification to ignore the natural time each has being alive now. That is what human rights arguments are all about.

DENYING NOW IS ETERNITY ON A UNIVERSAL SCALE.

Cannonpointer » 12 Apr 2022, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 4:32 pm

Hey, so far so stupid.. 

Good thing you're  a couch tater and not an affaleke.

What a crock of ****. 
 

I got the 2 Moderna shots.
No boosters.
I am confident in my decision.
But, I don't live in a world of make believe and conspiracy theories.
I will admit they are fun, but the vast majority of them are not true.
The first vaccine panic was for the small pox vaccine.
People were spreading lies that it would make women want to have sex with cows.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/ ... nd-jenner/
Don't see many half cow people running around.
The anti-vaxxers are well meaning, but misinformed.
https://www.newsweek.com/vaccination-an ... th-1342856
The technology used in the Covid vaccinations has been around more than 20 years.
Get the shots or don't.
Your body, your choice.
But, all you anti vaxxers better be consistent when it comes to abortions.

AnnoyedLiberall » 13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am

The technology used in the Covid vaccinations has been around more than 20 years.

And every time they tested mRNA vaccines on animals for corona viruses THEY FAILED, due to vaccine-enhanced disease, as even the insert and FDA warns about these jabs. Or did they forget to fully inform you about that, and the fact that you are the ferret this time around, since there was no animal testing prior to "vaccine" rollout.
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
"8.4.Unknown Risks/Data Gaps"
"Vaccine-enhanced disease Available data do not indicate a risk of vaccine-enhanced disease, and conversely suggest effectiveness against severe disease within the available follow-up period. However, risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted following authorization and/or licensure."
What is "vaccine-enhanced disease" or "pathogenic priming"?

And for what?
MyFreeDoctor.com has treated 150,000 COVID patients with a 99.99% success rate

While an inventor and patent holder of the mRNA technology platform warned not to use his technology for COVID-19 in January of 2020:
"4:04:50 - Vaccinologist Dr. Robert Malone: "The FDA absolutely, and my colleagues in vaccinology have long known that one of the great risks, one of the things that scares us most as vaccinologists, is vaccine-enhanced disease. And there's a long history of vaccine-enhanced disease examples over time. Respiratory Syncytial Virus is the one that's often cited by my fellow vaccinologists, but there's many others. This is why we have to be careful in developing these vaccines as one example of why we have to be so careful and why we have to be cautious about rolling them out and that we do the science. But in the case of vaccine-enhanced disease with corona virus vaccines this is a known complication. It's one of the reasons why I advised my group not to pursue vaccines when we got the call from Wuhan in January of 2020. Vaccine enhanced disease with corona viruses has long been a problem. It has compromised every prior corona vaccine development effort, including the veterinary ones. It's been overcome twice with veterinary vaccines and both of those are mucosal vaccines. So in short this is a known problem, many of us that are down in the trenches are carefully monitoring whether or not there are data emerging that suggest the problem might be occurring, and now we seem to be seeing clinical data that is consistent with that. But as Dr. Risch I'm sure will share we have to be cautious because there are multiple confounding variables."

4:07:00 - Yale School of Public Health professor of epidemiology Dr. Harvey Risch: "Well no actually, the Public Health U.K. has actually published a statement about this in their week 42 weekly report that showed that people who've had COVID and then get vaccinated have lower levels of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, and this means - and since the vaccines don't address the nucleocapsid antigens, they only address the spike - it means that they're doing something that's damaging the immune response in a more general way than just what they do with the spike. And this is empirical data that Public Health U.K. has published. So we know that this is happening. It's not theoretical issue about all of the niceties about laboratory biology and virology about things that could happen, it's a real thing that's been really observed by VaR testing."
https://rumble.com/embed/vqjwua/?pub=4
 

The term "pureblood" is absurd. Vaccines do not make anyone's blood impure.

AnnoyedLiberall » 13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am

I got the 2 Moderna shots.
No boosters.
I am confident in my decision.
But, I don't live in a world of make believe and conspiracy theories.
I will admit they are fun, but the vast majority of them are not true.
The first vaccine panic was for the small pox vaccine.
People were spreading lies that it would make women want to have sex with cows.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/ ... nd-jenner/
Don't see many half cow people running around.
The anti-vaxxers are well meaning, but misinformed.
https://www.newsweek.com/vaccination-an ... th-1342856
The technology used in the Covid vaccinations has been around more than 20 years.
Get the shots or don't.
Your body, your choice.
But, all you anti vaxxers better be consistent when it comes to abortions.

2 different things. abortion isn't about the woman's body. it's about killing a child. 2 totally different things. a vaxxed person logically shouldn't give a **** if someone is unvaxxed if he or she actually believe the vax works. and the government does have a record on **** the general public over with medicine. like when they told entire black commuities they were getting vaccines to help them and they injected them with syphilis so they could have a controlled study on the effects of the disease. and by the way? it the so called "conspiarcy theorists" that have been getting things right nowadays.

lewstherin » 13 Apr 2022, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 7:51 am

2 different things. abortion isn't about the woman's body. it's about killing a child. 2 totally different things. a vaxxed person logically shouldn't give a **** if someone is unvaxxed if he or she actually believe the vax works. and the government does have a record on **** the general public over with medicine. like when they told entire black commuities they were getting vaccines to help them and they injected them with syphilis so they could have a controlled study on the effects of the disease. and by the way? it the so called "conspiarcy theorists" that have been getting things right nowadays.

Abortion is not different in the eyes of the law.
My personal feelings about it aside.
You have no argument with me about this.
I believe people should always follow their own beliefs.

A woman should have the ABSOLUTE right to reproduce or not.

Xavier_Onassis » 13 Apr 2022, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 8:20 am

A woman should have the ABSOLUTE right to reproduce or not.

yeah. that decision comes when she decides whether or not to take the raw dick.

AnnoyedLiberall » 13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am

I got the 2 Moderna shots.
No boosters.
I am confident in my decision.
But, I don't live in a world of make believe and conspiracy theories.

Not a "theory" to recognize that today you are essentially without protection from the rapidly-waning non-"vaccine".
Pretty much same rules apply to Moderna:
Pfizer CEO "We know the two-dose vaccine offers very limited protection, if any"

Particularly against variants, since the A,B strains they were designed for, don't exist anymore. Israeli's found it lost 40% per month against the original strains, which suggests close to a half-life chart.
Pfizer-BioNTech effectiveness down to 42% Moderna down to 76%

 

AnnoyedLiberall » 13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am

Your body, your choice.
But, all you anti vaxxers better be consistent when it comes to abortions.
 

If you're referring to the study that showed that 8 out of 10 women miscarried, who got vaxxed prior to their 3rd trimester, I remain consistently against volunteering pregnant women to be a lab rats in a criminal corporation's investigational experiment without properly informing them of the risks.
Study Shows 8 In 10 Women Had A Miscarriage After Getting The Covid Vaccine Before The Third Trimester
 

freeman » 13 Apr 2022, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 8:31 am

If you're referring to the study that showed that 8 out of 10 women miscarried, who got vaxxed prior to their 3rd trimester, I remain consistently against volunteering pregnant women to be a lab rats in a criminal corporation's investigational experiment without properly informing them of the risks.
Study Shows 8 In 10 Women Had A Miscarriage After Getting The Covid Vaccine Before The Third Trimester
 

Stop being obtuse.
You know perfectly well I am not referring to that.
Unless, of course, you are equating abortion with miscarriage.
Is that your stance?

AnnoyedLiberall » 13 Apr 2022, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 8:36 am

Stop being obtuse.
You know perfectly well I am not referring to that.
Unless, of course, you are equating abortion with miscarriage.
Is that your stance?

I was obviously referring to "vaccine"-induced abortion.
abortion

1. Induced termination of a pregnancy with destruction of the embryo or fetus.
2. Any of various procedures that result in the termination of a pregnancy.
3. Cessation of normal growth, especially of an organ or other body part, prior to full development or maturation.

freeman » 13 Apr 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 8:41 am

I was obviously referring to "vaccine"-induced abortion.
abortion

1. Induced termination of a pregnancy with destruction of the embryo or fetus.
2. Any of various procedures that result in the termination of a pregnancy.
3. Cessation of normal growth, especially of an organ or other body part, prior to full development or maturation.

You weren't 'obviously referring' to anything.
You were going for a gotcha that gotcha looking like a fool.

AnnoyedLiberall » 13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 7:23 am

But, I don't live in a world of make believe and conspiracy theories.

https://rumble.com/embed/vqjwua/?pub=4
I hope you can find the time to avail yourself of the above posted video by what you've been indoctrinated into believing are "conspiracy theorists" and "quacks" in the form of: Dr. Robert Malone an inventor of the mRNA technology platform - Yale School of Public Health professor of epidemiology Dr. Harvey Risch - author of 600 peer reviewed papers and most published author in world history in cardio-renal medicine and treating physician Dr. Peter McCullough - owner of the largest diagnostic center in his state, pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole who presides over data on about 40,000 biopsies a year - and Dr. Ben Marble who heads a large group of treating physicians that have treated over 150,000 COVID patients through telemedicine, with only 4 deaths.

After all, where did the Left's Emperor and Big Pharma's bitch Doctor Death Fauci and his NIH, take the U.S. death toll, compared to dirt-poor, crowded, unsanitary, 3rd world countries?

lewstherin » 13 Apr 2022, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 7:51 am

2 different things. abortion isn't about the woman's body. it's about killing a child. 2 totally different things. a vaxxed person logically shouldn't give a **** if someone is unvaxxed if he or she actually believe the vax works. and the government does have a record on **** the general public over with medicine. like when they told entire black commuities they were getting vaccines to help them and they injected them with syphilis so they could have a controlled study on the effects of the disease. and by the way? it the so called "conspiarcy theorists" that have been getting things right nowadays.

abortion is a mercy killing. That simple. understand kinetic biology over intellectual social designed outcomes forward. Equally arriving incoming great great grandchildren doesn mean equal existing of persons reaching great great grandparent level or not.

Each great great grandchild only evolves into being 1 of 16 great great grandparents and that depends on 4 generations between the 5 when arriving great great grandchildren change population tomorrow, here today.

omh » 13 Apr 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 9:40 am

abortion is a mercy killing. That simple. understand kinetic biology over intellectual social designed outcomes forward. Equally arriving incoming great great grandchildren doesn mean equal existing of persons reaching great great grandparent level or not.

Each great great grandchild only evolves into being 1 of 16 great great grandparents and that depends on 4 generations between the 5 when arriving great great grandchildren change population tomorrow, here today.

you could take that philosophy and apply it to anyone. i could say killing my grandparents or my parents or my kid was a mercy killing. i could make the claim that killing all blacks was a mercy killing. or jews. or whites. 

lewstherin » 13 Apr 2022, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 9:45 am

you could take that philosophy and apply it to anyone. i could say killing my grandparents or my parents or my kid was a mercy killing. i could make the claim that killing all blacks was a mercy killing. or jews. or whites. 

you need to comprehend instinctive awareness isn't an intellectual contextual philosophy among people ignoring why they only exist perpetually balancing in time of living in series parallel occupying space now.

Molecular migration between inorganic universal positions and ancestral displacements living here after conceived, now. Thermodynamics in plain sight. Life as it exists lasts between erosion and decomposition of the same (matter), inorganic or organic. Periodic elements combinations or DNA cellular forms.

Nothing more simple than the kinetic whole is equal to total sum of its ever changing formed parts present.

Pastafarian » 13 Apr 2022, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 7:10 am

What a crock of ****.

Okay, Tuskegee breath - keep playing jackass. 

omh » 13 Apr 2022, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2022, 6:52 am

when is it I don't say everyone is unique because biology eternally separates ancestors conceived to decomposed here after conceived and until decomposed life cycle is complete.

I constantly keep saying it only exists mutually evolving now and everyone else believes living is only taking place intellectually typecasting everything universally balancing into a new total sum now.

Natural justice vs human intellectual social justification to ignore the natural time each has being alive now. That is what human rights arguments are all about.

DENYING NOW IS ETERNITY ON A UNIVERSAL SCALE.

I have not mutually evolved because I am different.