Liberal Forum

ConservativeWave » 12 Apr 2022, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 9:26 am

NOTHING now... HE had a chance when he was elected... by NOT spending TRILLIONS of $$$ that we DID NOT HAVE, and DID NOT NEED..

THEN he could have pressured the Fed to start raising interest rates SOONER...

But NOW?  BIDEN can do NOTHING EXCEPT pressure the Fed to raise interest rates quickly... which will CAUSE an economic RECESSION, INITIATE a BEAR Market, and WRING all the excesses OUT of the economy... it will take a couple years, and LOTS of people will lose LOTS of money... and Democrats will have to govern THRU IT...  ACCEPT Responsibility FOR IT, and DEAL with the CONSEQUENCES OF IT !!

This can’t be right.  Biden spending is but a fraction of Bush spending.. or Obama stimulus spending.  Yet those did not drive inflation thru the roof.  As for the Fed, they instruct the president, not the other way around..

I don’t think anyone has shown how Biden is to blame for inflation.  I feel like he is to blame, but it would be nice to have sound logic to support my feelings.  Can anyone help me with some bias confirmation that is really compelling?

I'm waiting for fox news to tell these idiot what to say.

In the midst of a full-blown crisis for parents who need formula to feed their children, more than 90% of House Republicans decided on Wednesday that the shortage that has led to panic and despair is not actually that big a deal, with 192 (out of 208) GOP lawmakers voting against an emergency spending bill meant to address the terrifying situation. Sorry, babies! Them’s the breaks.


https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05 ... note-votes


**** the neoinnocent!

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:02 am

In the midst of a full-blown crisis for parents who need formula to feed their children, more than 90% of House Republicans decided on Wednesday that the shortage that has led to panic and despair is not actually that big a deal, with 192 (out of 208) GOP lawmakers voting against an emergency spending bill meant to address the terrifying situation. Sorry, babies! Them’s the breaks.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05 ... note-votes

**** the neoinnocent!

There were two Bills that were voted on.  One passed 

The House voted on two baby formula bills Wednesday night. The first passed with near unanimous support as only nine members, all Republicans, voted in favor of a bill expanding the types of formulas eligible for families in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children -- known to most as WIC benefits.That bill, which the U.S. Senate passed Thursday on a unanimous voice vote, will allow WIC families to buy formula from more than one type of supplier.
the second bill was not a direct spending bill for families but to hire more FDA inspectors:

The bill would allow the FDA to hire more people, specifically inspectors, as the U.S. imports more formula from foreign countries to make up for supply shortages tied to a recall at an Abbott plant in Michigan and ongoing supply chain issues.

And:

Blank checks for bureaucrats is not the formula needed to fix this crisis," Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-Hazelhurst) wrote in a tweet.

Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Green Bay) contended the White House should have addressed any shortcomings at the FDA months earlier.“This crisis didn’t occur because the FDA lacked money to spend on staff," Gallagher said in a statement. "This crisis boiled over due to significant supply chain issues and structural deficiencies at the FDA that the Biden administration waited months to address

And

 “The problem here is not the FDA being short $28 million dollars, or needing to build up bureaucracy for a job the FDA already has the capability of doing," Steil said in a statement.A spokesperson for Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Fond du Lac) said the FDA funding bill failed to give the agency direct instruction "or help to develop a concrete plan" to address the shortage. Grothman's office said the believe U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack already has enough funding at his disposal to address supply chain problems.


https://www.wkow.com/news/wisconsin-rep ... aad27.html
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2022, 8:00 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 8:00 pm

No...that is, as always, a total load of bollocks.

Another assertion you will fail to support.

 no...you run all time....when will you answer this question 

viewtopic.php?p=2031725#p2031725     

TB7 » 21 May 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:19 am

no...you run all time....when will you answer this question 

viewtopic.php?p=2031725#p2031725   

Before I do, you may acknowledge that you declined to answer the question in the thread title.

Huey » 21 May 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:18 am

There were two Bills that were voted on.  One passed 

The House voted on two baby formula bills Wednesday night. The first passed with near unanimous support as only nine members, all Republicans, voted in favor of a bill expanding the types of formulas eligible for families in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children -- known to most as WIC benefits.That bill, which the U.S. Senate passed Thursday on a unanimous voice vote, will allow WIC families to buy formula from more than one type of supplier.
the second bill was not a direct spending bill for families but to hire more FDA inspectors:

The bill would allow the FDA to hire more people, specifically inspectors, as the U.S. imports more formula from foreign countries to make up for supply shortages tied to a recall at an Abbott plant in Michigan and ongoing supply chain issues.

And:

Blank checks for bureaucrats is not the formula needed to fix this crisis," Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-Hazelhurst) wrote in a tweet.

Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Green Bay) contended the White House should have addressed any shortcomings at the FDA months earlier.“This crisis didn’t occur because the FDA lacked money to spend on staff," Gallagher said in a statement. "This crisis boiled over due to significant supply chain issues and structural deficiencies at the FDA that the Biden administration waited months to address

And

 “The problem here is not the FDA being short $28 million dollars, or needing to build up bureaucracy for a job the FDA already has the capability of doing," Steil said in a statement.A spokesperson for Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Fond du Lac) said the FDA funding bill failed to give the agency direct instruction "or help to develop a concrete plan" to address the shortage. Grothman's office said the believe U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack already has enough funding at his disposal to address supply chain problems.

https://www.wkow.com/news/wisconsin-rep ... aad27.html

gracias for the party line, Toady..

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:23 am

gracias for the party line, Toady..

Just bringing the facts you ignored.  You hate facty thingies.

And it is not like once you expand a federal department for a crisis it immediately reduces in size once the crisis is over.  Particularly when they already have the money to do what they need to do.

Huey » 21 May 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:28 am

Just bringing the facts you ignored.  You hate facty thingies.

And it is not like once you expand a federal department for a crisis it immediately reduces in size once the crisis is over.  Particularly when they already have the money to do what they need to do.

not "facts", toady....rationales...

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:22 am

Before I do, you may acknowledge that you declined to answer the question in the thread title.

i acknowledge wholeheartedly that you have declined to answer the question given May 14thSO, BEFORE I ANSWER, YOU MAY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE DECLINED TO ANSWER THE QUESTION ON MAY 14TH

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:39 am

not "facts", toady....rationales...

The facts were two bills were voted on.  One passed.

Then the facts concerning why the second bill was not passed.   Call it a rationale if you like.  You can not present a narrative as to why that rationale is wrong.


Ps.  Keep trying.  You are failing miserably.

TB7 » 21 May 2022, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:42 am

i acknowledge wholeheartedly that you have declined to answer the question given May 14thSO, BEFORE I ANSWER, YOU MAY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE DECLINED TO ANSWER THE QUESTION ON MAY 14TH

post the rule.

Huey » 21 May 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:18 am

There were two Bills that were voted on.  One passed 

The House voted on two baby formula bills Wednesday night. The first passed with near unanimous support as only nine members, all Republicans, voted in favor of a bill expanding the types of formulas eligible for families in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children -- known to most as WIC benefits.That bill, which the U.S. Senate passed Thursday on a unanimous voice vote, will allow WIC families to buy formula from more than one type of supplier.
the second bill was not a direct spending bill for families but to hire more FDA inspectors:

The bill would allow the FDA to hire more people, specifically inspectors, as the U.S. imports more formula from foreign countries to make up for supply shortages tied to a recall at an Abbott plant in Michigan and ongoing supply chain issues.

And:

Blank checks for bureaucrats is not the formula needed to fix this crisis," Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-Hazelhurst) wrote in a tweet.

Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Green Bay) contended the White House should have addressed any shortcomings at the FDA months earlier.“This crisis didn’t occur because the FDA lacked money to spend on staff," Gallagher said in a statement. "This crisis boiled over due to significant supply chain issues and structural deficiencies at the FDA that the Biden administration waited months to address

And

 “The problem here is not the FDA being short $28 million dollars, or needing to build up bureaucracy for a job the FDA already has the capability of doing," Steil said in a statement.A spokesperson for Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Fond du Lac) said the FDA funding bill failed to give the agency direct instruction "or help to develop a concrete plan" to address the shortage. Grothman's office said the believe U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack already has enough funding at his disposal to address supply chain problems.

https://www.wkow.com/news/wisconsin-rep ... aad27.html

post the numbers of the bills to which you are referring.

Huey » 21 May 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:28 am

Just bringing the facts you ignored.  You hate facty thingies.

And it is not like once you expand a federal department for a crisis it immediately reduces in size once the crisis is over.  Particularly when they already have the money to do what they need to do.

post the name of the most fiscally responsible POTUS for whom you have voted..

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:02 am

post the numbers of the bills to which you are referring.

 
Pound sand.

You Posted about this and you don’t know?  Do your own work.  Google is your friend   

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:05 am

post the name of the most fiscally responsible POTUS for whom you have voted..

 

pound sand.  The great diversion begins!

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:56 am

post the rule.

****-OFF AND POST IT YOURSELF

Huey » 21 May 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:08 am

 
Pound sand.

You Posted about this and you don’t know?  Do your own work.  Google is your friend 

You made vague references to 2 different bills.

But if this is yet another new rule..

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2022, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 6:11 am

Morons!

You have the floor.

List all the things Jesse and Greg have told you will happen after November, and why you believe they will make a difference.

Don't make me call you sniveling cowards out by name.

You even asking the question in your threat title is an act of dickhead desperation.  That's when a dickhead like you get desperate for talking points and is willing to make a dickhead out of himself with clueless stupidity....you pulled it off masterfully 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:11 am

You made vague references to 2 different bills.

But if this is yet another new rule..

I also supplied a link.  If you are interested click the link and read the article.