Liberal Forum

Huey » 21 May 2022, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:09 am

 

pound sand.  The great diversion begins!

Huey » 21 May 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:18 am

I also supplied a link.  If you are interested click the link and read the article.

There were two Bills that were voted on.  One passed 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:46 am

Which bill didn't pass?

Huey » 21 May 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:51 am

Pound Sand

you have a link.  And I discussed it.

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:54 am

Dwarf,

The bill to which I was referring PASSED.

**** imbecile.

Huey » 21 May 2022, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:57 am

You shoulda went there first and I woulda said My mistake.  But you still have the reasons why they voted against it.

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 10:58 am

Manly.

Why is Dwarf a reflexive imbecile?

Because Blackvegetable.....

Huey » 21 May 2022, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:01 am

I admit I made a mistake.  What you have not done is address the reasons why they did.  Not blaming you.  Just pointed out instead of diverting you should have pointed that out right away.  Thereby running from your posts.

I do what you don’t.  I admit when I make a mistake.

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:02 am

Dwarf,

We have yet to determine to which bill you have been referring, factually..

Huey » 21 May 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:18 am

There were two Bills that were voted on.  One passed 

The House voted on two baby formula bills Wednesday night. The first passed with near unanimous support as only nine members, all Republicans, voted in favor of a bill expanding the types of formulas eligible for families in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children -- known to most as WIC benefits.That bill, which the U.S. Senate passed Thursday on a unanimous voice vote, will allow WIC families to buy formula from more than one type of supplier.
the second bill was not a direct spending bill for families but to hire more FDA inspectors:

The bill would allow the FDA to hire more people, specifically inspectors, as the U.S. imports more formula from foreign countries to make up for supply shortages tied to a recall at an Abbott plant in Michigan and ongoing supply chain issues.

And:

Blank checks for bureaucrats is not the formula needed to fix this crisis," Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-Hazelhurst) wrote in a tweet.

Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Green Bay) contended the White House should have addressed any shortcomings at the FDA months earlier.“This crisis didn’t occur because the FDA lacked money to spend on staff," Gallagher said in a statement. "This crisis boiled over due to significant supply chain issues and structural deficiencies at the FDA that the Biden administration waited months to address

And

 “The problem here is not the FDA being short $28 million dollars, or needing to build up bureaucracy for a job the FDA already has the capability of doing," Steil said in a statement.A spokesperson for Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Fond du Lac) said the FDA funding bill failed to give the agency direct instruction "or help to develop a concrete plan" to address the shortage. Grothman's office said the believe U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack already has enough funding at his disposal to address supply chain problems.

https://www.wkow.com/news/wisconsin-rep ... aad27.html

Huey » 21 May 2022, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:04 am

You have the link.  I’ll repost it.

Huey » 21 May 2022, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:05 am

That link will tell you.  Look for the bill concerning WIC.

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:07 am

Why is that relevant?

You implied that the bill to which I referred may not have passed.

You had no idea what you were yapping about.

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:07 am

I didn't ask for directions.

Huey » 21 May 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:08 am

And I already admitted I made a mistake on that.  Explain what part of that statement you don’t understand.

Huey » 21 May 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 9:28 am

Just bringing the facts you ignored.  You hate facty thingies.

And it is not like once you expand a federal department for a crisis it immediately reduces in size once the crisis is over.  Particularly when they already have the money to do what they need to do.

Huey » 21 May 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:08 am

Then pound sand.

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:09 am

Do you understand what your mistake is?

Huey » 21 May 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:09 am

@Blackvegetable

Just bringing the facts you ignored.  You hate facty thingies

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2022, 11:11 am

Why are you reposting this?

You just admitted that you were undergoing another "episode".

Do you have a case?