Because I asked you to tell me what they are proposing to do about inflation?NEILCAR » 24 May 2022, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ vegie knows how to solve the inflation problem ... he is just embarrassed that his dems party will not doing anything about it ...
Old dems trick ... dem's control House, Senate, and the Presidency ... so he wants to blame the Republicans ... dem logic ...lol
We talked about this a week ago ... I know you know how to solve the inflation problem ...Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑ Because I asked you to tell me what they are proposing to do about inflation?
And you don't have an answer?
Occam's Razor, Neil.
You're a moron.
Neil,NEILCAR » 24 May 2022, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ We talked about this a week ago ... I know you know how to solve the inflation problem ...
... You are just baiting people so you can then call them names ... but the truth is the dems are in charge right now and they refuse to solve the problem ... in fact the dems are making it worse by also not solving the Supply side problem ...
I would remind you that one should always give precedence to simplicity (Occam's Razor)... the dems are in charge and they are failing.
You know this so you are "switching" the conversation from "what are the people in power doing", --- to what the minority is doing... lol
wow, lamb minded deflection. Remember which cast of characters are on which side of accusing and accused. Pointing the finger of blame leaves 3 pointing back at those instigating the whole New World Order scenario.
Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ Neil,
No retelling.
You were asked what the GOP proposes to do about it, and you have bupkis.
Why are you still leaking?
there is an answer, you won't give it because your reality is as corrupted as BV's. Point of views thinking outside a box are angles of deflecting how biological self containment actually works in plain sight.NEILCAR » 24 May 2022, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ It is a rhetorical question you propose for effect ... there is no answer...
If the Republican are in favor of air, the dems will be against it, if Republicans support free gasoline for a month the dems will be against that ....
It doesn't matter what the republicans propose ... the dems will be against it ...
It is time for dems to show us their PROBLEM SOLVING AND LEADERSHIP SKILLS --- and they are failing ...
Domestic, Foreign, Energy, Economy Policies --- all complete failures.
Some Senate Republicans, meanwhile, have a plan to hamper inflation for good. A bill introduced by Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina on January 12 aims to ban government spending that's estimated to lift inflation above a 4.5% year-over-year rate. The measure would use estimates from the Congressional Budget Office of a bill's effect on the Consumer Price Index. Though the proposal has only been introduced, it boasts 12 cosponsors and represents the GOP's latest plan to strike down Biden's ambitious spending plans.Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑Neil,NEILCAR » 24 May 2022, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ We talked about this a week ago ... I know you know how to solve the inflation problem ...
... You are just baiting people so you can then call them names ... but the truth is the dems are in charge right now and they refuse to solve the problem ... in fact the dems are making it worse by also not solving the Supply side problem ...
I would remind you that one should always give precedence to simplicity (Occam's Razor)... the dems are in charge and they are failing.
You know this so you are "switching" the conversation from "what are the people in power doing", --- to what the minority is doing... lol
No retelling.
You were asked what the GOP proposes to do about it, and you have bupkis.
Why are you still leaking?
BEES IN YOUR BONNET!Beekeeper » 12 Apr 2022, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑ EVERY major economist says there are only 2 ways to fight inflation.
1. Wage and price controls. Which never really worked before and always end in a bad recession.
2. Employ a contractionary monetary policy to fight inflation by reducing the money supply within an economy via decreased bond prices and increased interest rates. Which is how MOST people feel is the better way and one that can be done in many cases without a recession or one that is very mild and short lived.
Now, MORONS, you two can basically take a hike and thank us for have the SOLUTION while YOUR SIDE continues to pour MORE GAS (government money you're printing and spending) on that inflation fire since you have NO CLUE how to slow it or stop it.
No, Neil.NEILCAR » 24 May 2022, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ It is a rhetorical question you propose for effect ... there is no answer...
If the Republican are in favor of air, the dems will be against it, if Republicans support free gasoline for a month the dems will be against that ....
It doesn't matter what the republicans propose ... the dems will be against it ...
It is time for dems to show us their PROBLEM SOLVING AND LEADERSHIP SKILLS --- and they are failing ...
Domestic, Foreign, Energy, Economy Policies --- all complete failures.
BIG OLD BABY HUEY & HIS RNC CULTIST SCUM TROTTING OUT THE PROVEN RECIPE OF STAGFLATION! HIGHER & HIGHER INTEREST RATES TO MAKE IT HARDER FOR NEW COMPANIES TO BORROW & COMPETE! U DUMBASSES NEVER LEARNED ANYTHING OTHER THAN ECON 1O1! U SHOULD HAVE TAKEN SOME 300 LEVEL COURSES!Huey » 24 May 2022, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Some Senate Republicans, meanwhile, have a plan to hamper inflation for good. A bill introduced by Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina on January 12 aims to ban government spending that's estimated to lift inflation above a 4.5% year-over-year rate. The measure would use estimates from the Congressional Budget Office of a bill's effect on the Consumer Price Index. Though the proposal has only been introduced, it boasts 12 cosponsors and represents the GOP's latest plan to strike down Biden's ambitious spending plans.
And
Inflation is mostly in the hands of the Fed now anyway
And for all the discussion both parties are poised to have around inflation, neither has the silver bullet to cool price growth. The Fed is the only authority that can raise interest rates, which is historically the most effective way to rein in price growth.
https://www.businessinsider.com/inflati ... ing-2022-1
Bats in your skull that holds your evolved fertilized cell sustaining your choices to ignore the self evident.supraTruth » 24 May 2022, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ BEES IN YOUR BONNET!
STAGFLATION IS WHAT U ARE CALLING FOR! U WANT THE 🍊🐖'S JAY POWELL TO SIC THE FED ON OUR BOOMING ECONOMY TO CREATE STAGFLATION TO SCREW PRESIDENT BIDEN THE WAY G. WILLIAM MILLER & PAUL VOLKER SCREWED PRESIDENT CARTER!
ALL FOR THE HOMO LOVE & IDOLATRY OF A FAT LOOSE *** OF AN 🍊🐖!
supraTruth » 24 May 2022, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑BIG OLD BABY HUEY & HIS RNC CULTIST SCUM TROTTING OUT THE PROVEN RECIPE OF STAGFLATION! HIGHER & HIGHER INTEREST RATES TO MAKE IT HARDER FOR NEW COMPANIES TO BORROW & COMPETE! U DUMBASSES NEVER LEARNED ANYTHING OTHER THAN ECON 1O1! U SHOULD HAVE TAKEN SOME 300 LEVEL COURSES!Huey » 24 May 2022, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Some Senate Republicans, meanwhile, have a plan to hamper inflation for good. A bill introduced by Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina on January 12 aims to ban government spending that's estimated to lift inflation above a 4.5% year-over-year rate. The measure would use estimates from the Congressional Budget Office of a bill's effect on the Consumer Price Index. Though the proposal has only been introduced, it boasts 12 cosponsors and represents the GOP's latest plan to strike down Biden's ambitious spending plans.
And
Inflation is mostly in the hands of the Fed now anyway
And for all the discussion both parties are poised to have around inflation, neither has the silver bullet to cool price growth. The Fed is the only authority that can raise interest rates, which is historically the most effective way to rein in price growth.
https://www.businessinsider.com/inflati ... ing-2022-1
Have they quantified the anticipated effect?Huey » 24 May 2022, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Some Senate Republicans, meanwhile, have a plan to hamper inflation for good. A bill introduced by Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina on January 12 aims to ban government spending that's estimated to lift inflation above a 4.5% year-over-year rate. The measure would use estimates from the Congressional Budget Office of a bill's effect on the Consumer Price Index. Though the proposal has only been introduced, it boasts 12 cosponsors and represents the GOP's latest plan to strike down Biden's ambitious spending plans.
And
Inflation is mostly in the hands of the Fed now anyway
And for all the discussion both parties are poised to have around inflation, neither has the silver bullet to cool price growth. The Fed is the only authority that can raise interest rates, which is historically the most effective way to rein in price growth.
https://www.businessinsider.com/inflati ... ing-2022-1
:rofl:Huey » 24 May 2022, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ Apparently all of those that have taken those courses aren't doing such a swell job at the moment. And I was too busy gaining skills that make me lots of money.
Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑Have they quantified the anticipated effect?Huey » 24 May 2022, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Some Senate Republicans, meanwhile, have a plan to hamper inflation for good. A bill introduced by Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina on January 12 aims to ban government spending that's estimated to lift inflation above a 4.5% year-over-year rate. The measure would use estimates from the Congressional Budget Office of a bill's effect on the Consumer Price Index. Though the proposal has only been introduced, it boasts 12 cosponsors and represents the GOP's latest plan to strike down Biden's ambitious spending plans.
And
Inflation is mostly in the hands of the Fed now anyway
And for all the discussion both parties are poised to have around inflation, neither has the silver bullet to cool price growth. The Fed is the only authority that can raise interest rates, which is historically the most effective way to rein in price growth.
https://www.businessinsider.com/inflati ... ing-2022-1
Lest you start with the runny/runny, it is entirely doable.
With math.
So, I'm guessing we're done here.
you have no idea, slack jaw.Huey » 24 May 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ You wanted to see what the GOP is proposing. There ya go. Answer your own questions. I was done when I posted it. You asked. You got an answer. Your turn.
Every reality is misdirection of actual life for the benefit of those selling hope, faith, charity tomorrow actually exists beyond mutually evolving here now.Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ you have no idea, slack jaw.
But let me tell you...
Not a hell of a whole lot.
To get an idea, look at the formula for gdp, and consider that Consumer Spending represents 65% or more of it. That only leaves 35% for everything else.
Acknowledge that an explanation has been provided, even if you have no idea what was just said.
Acknowledge two things.Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑you have no idea, slack jaw.Huey » 24 May 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ You wanted to see what the GOP is proposing. There ya go. Answer your own questions. I was done when I posted it. You asked. You got an answer. Your turn.
But let me tell you...
Not a hell of a whole lot.
To get an idea, look at the formula for gdp, and consider that Consumer Spending represents 65% or more of it. That only leaves 35% for everything else.
Acknowledge that an explanation has been provided, even if you have no idea what was just said.
You must acknowledge because you lie.Huey » 24 May 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Acknowledge two things.
1. Re: If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now? has been answered.
2. Acknowledge that I don't care about your diversion.mg: