Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 10:34 am

You must acknowledge because you lie.

Now acknowledge. 

True speculation manifested into social facts governing tomorrow today, is always speculation without understanding total sum arrived actually here.

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 10:34 am

Huey » 24 May 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 10:19 am

Acknowledge two things.

1.  Re: If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now? has been answered.

2.  Acknowledge that I don't care about your diversion.   mg:

You must acknowledge because you lie.

Now acknowledge.

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.  

 
 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 9:10 am

No, Neil.

Don't try to get jiggy with it.

It isn't  "rhetorical".

If these problems have a political solution, then it should be offered.

If it doesn't, then voting for the return of the **** who have offered nothing in 32 years isn't gonna change anything.

The question remain what are the dems doing about the inflation that they caused... 

In about 1 year the dems have ruined the economy, energy, foreign and domestic programs --- have not found any solutions to anything ... and in reality the dems have made almost everything worse... 

hell biden isn't even the president ... every time he makes a speech the White House walks it back ... I thought the President set the policy ... if someone else is ... then who is the real president ... you are defending an entire party which is crumbling apart around you, as you speak ... 


 

Huey » 24 May 2022, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 10:50 am

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

No one cares.

You were asked a question and ran.

I answered my own question, again.

You are now reframying...
 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 11:05 am

Huey » 24 May 2022, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 10:50 am

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

No one cares.

You were asked a question and ran.

I answered my own question, again.

You are now reframying...
 

 

I acknowledge you gave an explanation and asked a question I do not care about.  You wanted a plan, you got.  

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

You were creating a diversion.  I am not interested in your diversion.  Now acknowledge you OP question was answered, that I don't care beyond that, I did not ask for an explanation, and I am not required to acknowledge an unsolicited question on a discussion I am not interested in.

Huey » 24 May 2022, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 11:13 am

I acknowledge you gave an explanation and asked a question I do not care about.  You wanted a plan, you got.  

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

You were creating a diversion.  I am not interested in your diversion.  Now acknowledge you OP question was answered, that I don't care beyond that, I did not ask for an explanation, and I am not required to acknowledge an unsolicited question on a discussion I am not interested in.

You don't care....now, of course.

Because you realize that you don't understand.

 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 11:55 am

Huey » 24 May 2022, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 11:13 am

I acknowledge you gave an explanation and asked a question I do not care about.  You wanted a plan, you got.  

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

You were creating a diversion.  I am not interested in your diversion.  Now acknowledge you OP question was answered, that I don't care beyond that, I did not ask for an explanation, and I am not required to acknowledge an unsolicited question on a discussion I am not interested in.

You don't care....now, of course.

Because you realize that you don't understand.

 

 

I didn't ask for you explanation and did not plan on entering into a discussion concerning your personal feeling of the proposed legislation.  

I acknowledge you gave an explanation and asked a question I do not care about.  You wanted a plan, you got.  

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

You were creating a diversion.  I am not interested in your diversion.  Now acknowledge you OP question was answered, that I don't care beyond that, I did not ask for an explanation, and I am not required to acknowledge an unsolicited question on a discussion I am not interested in.

Huey » 24 May 2022, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 11:59 am

I didn't ask for you explanation and did not plan on entering into a discussion concerning your personal feeling of the proposed legislation.  

I acknowledge you gave an explanation and asked a question I do not care about.  You wanted a plan, you got.  

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

You were creating a diversion.  I am not interested in your diversion.  Now acknowledge you OP question was answered, that I don't care beyond that, I did not ask for an explanation, and I am not required to acknowledge an unsolicited question on a discussion I am not interested in.

Stop yapping.

If you are only here to yap the party line, don't bother.

If you want to take a stand, put on your adult diaper 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 12:14 pm

Huey » 24 May 2022, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 11:59 am

I didn't ask for you explanation and did not plan on entering into a discussion concerning your personal feeling of the proposed legislation.  

I acknowledge you gave an explanation and asked a question I do not care about.  You wanted a plan, you got.  

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

You were creating a diversion.  I am not interested in your diversion.  Now acknowledge you OP question was answered, that I don't care beyond that, I did not ask for an explanation, and I am not required to acknowledge an unsolicited question on a discussion I am not interested in.

Stop yapping.

If you are only here to yap the party line, don't bother.

If you want to take a stand, put on your adult diaper 
 
 

 

I haven't "yapped" anything about the party line.  You asked for a republican plan.  I gave you one.

I didn't ask for you explanation and did not plan on entering into a discussion concerning your personal feeling of the proposed legislation.  

I acknowledge you gave an explanation and asked a question I do not care about.  You wanted a plan, you got.  

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

You were creating a diversion.  I am not interested in your diversion.  Now acknowledge you OP question was answered, that I don't care beyond that, I did not ask for an explanation, and I am not required to acknowledge an unsolicited question on a discussion I am not interested in.

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 12:14 pm

Stop yapping.

If you are only here to yap the party line, don't bother.

If you want to take a stand, put on your adult diaper

Why are you going on about inflation Blackvegetable.  We told you over 1 year ago EXACTLY what would result from Biden's policies.  You refused to acknowledge the truth about then and you continue to refuse to acknowledge the fallacies of the liberal socialist agenda now, even after they have materialized right before your eyes.

supraTruth » 24 May 2022, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 9:05 am

BEES IN YOUR BONNET!

STAGFLATION IS WHAT U ARE CALLING FOR!  U WANT THE 'S JAY POWELL TO SIC THE FED ON OUR BOOMING ECONOMY TO CREATE STAGFLATION TO SCREW PRESIDENT BIDEN THE WAY G. WILLIAM MILLER & PAUL VOLKER SCREWED PRESIDENT CARTER!

ALL FOR THE HOMO LOVE & IDOLATRY OF A FAT LOOSE *** OF AN !

Psssst. MORONIC dumbasarock.

Just so you know, STAGFLATION is already HERE and no interest rates have been "massively increased" in any manner. Beside, NO ONE has to raise interest rates to hurt you boy Bye-DUMB as he has destroyed any and all hope for himself or any Dhimmycrat to get elected with the MASSIVE screwups he has done and the pain he has inflicted on this nation.

Besides, you can't find me ONE SINGLE ECONOMIST OF ANY PERSUASION THAT WILL AGREE WITH ONE DANG THING YOU JUST POOPED OUT OF YOUR MOUTH.

Until you do, stay STUPID. Unless you TAKE MONEY OUT OF CIRCULATION, you can't get a handle on ANY INFLATION, of which TOO MUCH MONEY CHASING TOO FEW GOODS is the ROOT CAUSE OF ALL INFLATION. Learn that SIMPLE FACTUAL PRINCIPLE and you MIGHT figure it out, MORON!!!

And we DO  NOT have a "roaring economy" dumbasarock. SKY HIGH INFLATION isn't roaring ANYTHING in this economy, moron. ESPECIALLY when the Bye-DUMB SELF INFLICTED HIGH ENERGY PRICING is driving MOST of that Inflation. And try to explain to those TRUCKERS how them paying nearly TRIPLE the price of FUEL to get goods to market isn't really going to cause price increases ON THEIR END TO SHIP THINGS. If you do, you will find yourself digging a chain binder out of the back of your head.

Yeah, you're just that STUPID to say it too.

 

Beekeeper » 24 May 2022, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 1:44 pm

Psssst. MORONIC dumbasarock.

Just so you know, STAGFLATION is already HERE and no interest rates have been "massively increased" in any manner. Beside, NO ONE has to raise interest rates to hurt you boy Bye-DUMB as he has destroyed any and all hope for himself or any Dhimmycrat to get elected with the MASSIVE screwups he has done and the pain he has inflicted on this nation.

Besides, you can't find me ONE SINGLE ECONOMIST OF ANY PERSUASION THAT WILL AGREE WITH ONE DANG THING YOU JUST POOPED OUT OF YOUR MOUTH.

Until you do, stay STUPID. Unless you TAKE MONEY OUT OF CIRCULATION, you can't get a handle on ANY INFLATION, of which TOO MUCH MONEY CHASING TOO FEW GOODS is the ROOT CAUSE OF ALL INFLATION. Learn that SIMPLE FACTUAL PRINCIPLE and you MIGHT figure it out, MORON!!!

And we DO  NOT have a "roaring economy" dumbasarock. SKY HIGH INFLATION isn't roaring ANYTHING in this economy, moron. ESPECIALLY when the Bye-DUMB SELF INFLICTED HIGH ENERGY PRICING is driving MOST of that Inflation. And try to explain to those TRUCKERS how them paying nearly TRIPLE the price of FUEL to get goods to market isn't really going to cause price increases ON THEIR END TO SHIP THINGS. If you do, you will find yourself digging a chain binder out of the back of your head.

Yeah, you're just that STUPID to say it too.

Econ 101 won't even get u a burger.  

https://twitter.com/KennethLFisher/stat ... 52384?s=20

supraTruth » 24 May 2022, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 2:30 pm

Econ 101 won't even get u a burger.  
w
https://twitter.com/KennethLFisher/stat ... 52384?s=20
 

Hey MORONIC Doofus, Ken Fischer is a STOCK BROKER , NOT an economist you freaking loser.

Do you think you can pawn CRAPOLA and make it stick, thinking that WE DON'T CHECK OUT YOUR BULLCRAP???

GO play in the sand box and get one of those DARK, oblong CLUMPS and eat it. With any luck at all, it will make you smarter.

LibDave » 24 May 2022, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 1:09 pm

Why are you going on about inflation Blackvegetable.  We told you over 1 year ago EXACTLY what would result from Biden's policies.  You refused to acknowledge the truth about then and you continue to refuse to acknowledge the fallacies of the liberal socialist agenda now, even after they have materialized right before your eyes.

Are you prepared to acknowledge the event in Europe?

Twatty won't.

@Huey  
 

Huey » 24 May 2022, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 12:19 pm

I haven't "yapped" anything about the party line.  You asked for a republican plan.  I gave you one.

I didn't ask for you explanation and did not plan on entering into a discussion concerning your personal feeling of the proposed legislation.  

I acknowledge you gave an explanation and asked a question I do not care about.  You wanted a plan, you got.  

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

You were creating a diversion.  I am not interested in your diversion.  Now acknowledge you OP question was answered, that I don't care beyond that, I did not ask for an explanation, and I am not required to acknowledge an unsolicited question on a discussion I am not interested in.

I haven't "yapped" anything about the party line.  You asked for a republican plan.  I gave you one.

What a **** marooooon.

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 2:46 pm

LibDave » 24 May 2022, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 1:09 pm

Why are you going on about inflation Blackvegetable.  We told you over 1 year ago EXACTLY what would result from Biden's policies.  You refused to acknowledge the truth about then and you continue to refuse to acknowledge the fallacies of the liberal socialist agenda now, even after they have materialized right before your eyes.

Are you prepared to acknowledge the event in Europe?

Twatty won't.

@Huey  
 

 

I already have.  Are you prepared to acknowledge that inflation was 7.5% in January PRIOR to the event in Europe?  

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 2:47 pm

Huey » 24 May 2022, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 12:19 pm

I haven't "yapped" anything about the party line.  You asked for a republican plan.  I gave you one.

I didn't ask for you explanation and did not plan on entering into a discussion concerning your personal feeling of the proposed legislation.  

I acknowledge you gave an explanation and asked a question I do not care about.  You wanted a plan, you got.  

Here are three concise bullet points that represent my stance on your diversion. 

1.  I don't have to acknowledge anything because I did not ask for an explanation.  Acknowledge.

2.  I don't care.  Acknowledge.

3.  The question you asked "If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?" has been answered.  Acknowledge.

You were creating a diversion.  I am not interested in your diversion.  Now acknowledge you OP question was answered, that I don't care beyond that, I did not ask for an explanation, and I am not required to acknowledge an unsolicited question on a discussion I am not interested in.

I haven't "yapped" anything about the party line.  You asked for a republican plan.  I gave you one.

What a **** marooooon.

 

Here was your question:

If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?

Acknowledge you were answered. 

Huey » 24 May 2022, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 2:49 pm

Here was your question:

If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?

Acknowledge you were answered.

Melt down already, Fredo..

You know you need to.
 

Huey » 24 May 2022, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 2:49 pm

I already have.  Are you prepared to acknowledge that inflation was 7.5% in January PRIOR to the event in Europe?

I already have

**** this.

You have ZERO integrity.

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 2:51 pm

Melt down already, Fredo..

You know you need to.

Nah, haven’t been close to a melt down in ages.  And that pisses you off to no end.