Liberal Forum

NEILCAR » 25 May 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2022, 7:55 am

doesn't matter ...  bad dem policy is still bad dem policy ... 

you pump in too much money with a Supply Chain problem (that you dems still haven't fix) ... you get inflation ... 

it is not rocket science ...

Neil,

You are far too stupid to understand what matters.
 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2022, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2022, 7:58 am

Neil,

You are far too stupid to understand what matters.
 

What is "socially matters" made from? Speculation real isn't real in kinetic displacements occupying space now.

And yet in the real world — Dems have produced an economy that has too many dollars chasing too few goods. Me being stupid or not doesn’t change that fact.

NEILCAR » 25 May 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2022, 8:26 am

And yet in the real world — Dems have produced an economy that has too many dollars chasing too few goods. Me being stupid or not doesn’t change that fact.

What is a real world? Reality or genetic results in plain sight ignoring how living happens in plain sight to obey social mantras cradle to grave each generation until extinction event ends it.

NEILCAR » 25 May 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2022, 7:55 am

doesn't matter ...  bad dem policy is still bad dem policy ... 

you pump in too much money with a Supply Chain problem (that you dems still haven't fix) ... you get inflation ... 

it is not rocket science ...

I got this, Neil..

The federal deficit hit a record high of more than $3 trillion in fiscal year 2020 when the Covid-19 pandemic hit. The government spent more than $2 trillion that year in pandemic aid, including expanding unemployment benefits and increasing lending to small businesses -- approved by legislation signed into law by former President Donald Trump. Congress authorized another $1.9 trillion in response to the pandemic in 2021, legislation pushed by the Biden administration.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/25/politics ... index.html
 
 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2022, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2022, 4:15 pm

I got this, Neil..

The federal deficit hit a record high of more than $3 trillion in fiscal year 2020 when the Covid-19 pandemic hit. The government spent more than $2 trillion that year in pandemic aid, including expanding unemployment benefits and increasing lending to small businesses -- approved by legislation signed into law by former President Donald Trump. Congress authorized another $1.9 trillion in response to the pandemic in 2021, legislation pushed by the Biden administration.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/25/politics ... index.html
 
 

sure glad the shutdowns May through December had nothing to do with it. It was all done locally, Trump tried to convince urban controllers to leave things open for business.

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2022, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 6:11 am

If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?
 

No questions, dick sucker.

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2022, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2022, 2:46 pm

Are you prepared to acknowledge the event in Europe?

Twatty won't.

@Huey

You never actually come out and clearly explain your case.  Here I am assuming you are referring to the war in Ukraine.  And I also assume your confirmation bias immediately latched on to any event and used it to create a reason why you were wrong and I was exactly right 18 months ago.  For obvious reasons your confirmation bias is dead wrong.

The sanctions placed on Russia are not targeted at the Russian petroleum industry.  There has been no substantive disruption in energy exchanges as a result of the war in Ukraine, or sanctions on Russia.  The only disruption in energy production took place (and was caused by) the Biden administration in the first days in office.  These early actions by the Biden Administration resulted in high levels of inflation shortly thereafter, long before war in Ukraine. The sanctions which were put in place were targeted elsewhere, and the non-petroleum based aspects of the Russian economy are too small to make any impact on inflation here or elsewhere.  Russia is an oil company masquerading as a country.  The Russian economy is abysmally small in general.  Inflation was high long before Russia invaded Ukraine and since sanctions didn't involve Russian oil, oil prices continued just as they had been and would have regardless of the war in Ukraine.  It is nothing more than a convenient scapegoat for the Biden administration to use to obfuscate their disastrous economic policy.  And your confirmation bias obliged them.  Biden's attempt to use the war in Ukraine is no different than their similar attempt to use a myriad of other excuses (also without merit) prior to the war in Ukraine.  They even attempted to use global warming as an excuse.  And your lack of understanding of the field of economics, combined with your confirmation bias probably believed the global warming malarkey too.

LibDave » 25 May 2022, 10:33 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2022, 10:33 pm

You never actually come out and clearly explain your case.  Here I am assuming you are referring to the war in Ukraine.  And I also assume your confirmation bias immediately latched on to any event and used it to create a reason why you were wrong and I was exactly right 18 months ago.  For obvious reasons your confirmation bias is dead wrong.

The sanctions placed on Russia are not targeted at the Russian petroleum industry.  There has been no substantive disruption in energy exchanges as a result of the war in Ukraine, or sanctions on Russia.  The only disruption in energy production took place (and was caused by) the Biden administration in the first days in office.  These early actions by the Biden Administration resulted in high levels of inflation shortly thereafter, long before war in Ukraine. The sanctions which were put in place were targeted elsewhere, and the non-petroleum based aspects of the Russian economy are too small to make any impact on inflation here or elsewhere.  Russia is an oil company masquerading as a country.  The Russian economy is abysmally small in general.  Inflation was high long before Russia invaded Ukraine and since sanctions didn't involve Russian oil, oil prices continued just as they had been and would have regardless of the war in Ukraine.  It is nothing more than a convenient scapegoat for the Biden administration to use to obfuscate their disastrous economic policy.  And your confirmation bias obliged them.  Biden's attempt to use the war in Ukraine is no different than their similar attempt to use a myriad of other excuses (also without merit) prior to the war in Ukraine.  They even attempted to use global warming as an excuse.  And your lack of understanding of the field of economics, combined with your confirmation bias probably believed the global warming malarkey too.

**** you and your brain dead FOX fed narrative.

  The only disruption in energy production took place (and was caused by) the Biden administration in the first days in office.  These early actions by the Biden Administration resulted in high levels of inflation shortly thereafter, long before war in Ukraine

The EVIDENCE of which would be?

That Jesse is looking you right in the eye?

I get sick of you idiots talking as if you had any clue how energy markets work.

And I also assume your confirmation bias immediately latched on to any event and used it to create a reason why you were wrong and I was exactly right 18 months ago.  For obvious reasons your confirmation bias is dead wrong

Yea...me, the Fed and now the CBO.

**** moron.

Blackvegetable » 26 May 2022, 5:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2022, 5:48 am

**** you and your brain dead FOX fed narrative.

The EVIDENCE of which would be?

That Jesse is looking you right in the eye?

I get sick of you idiots talking as if you had any clue how energy markets work.

Yea...me, the Fed and now the CBO.

**** moron.

Are you claiming the high rate of inflation (especially petroleum) didn't occur until the invasion of Ukraine?  Ludicrous.  You also claimed over a year ago Biden's policies wouldn't result in inflation (the opposite) and again you were wrong.  Why is it your understanding of economic cause and affect never seem capable of correctly predicting future reality?  Perhaps it is time to reassess your understanding of economics?

LibDave » 26 May 2022, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

26 May 2022, 4:33 pm

Are you claiming the high rate of inflation (especially petroleum) didn't occur until the invasion of Ukraine?  Ludicrous.  You also claimed over a year ago Biden's policies wouldn't result in inflation (the opposite) and again you were wrong.  Why is it your understanding of economic cause and affect never seem capable of correctly predicting future reality?  Perhaps it is time to reassess your understanding of economics?

You talk about confirmation bias while asserting, without a shred of evidence, that inflation is Biden’s fault.

Before we go any further, why don't you tell me how much econ you have studied?

Answer the question honestly and we can discuss the specifics 

LibDave » 26 May 2022, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

26 May 2022, 4:33 pm

Blackvegetable » 26 May 2022, 5:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2022, 5:48 am

**** you and your brain dead FOX fed narrative.

The EVIDENCE of which would be?

That Jesse is looking you right in the eye?

I get sick of you idiots talking as if you had any clue how energy markets work.

Yea...me, the Fed and now the CBO.

**** moron.

Are you claiming the high rate of inflation (especially petroleum) didn't occur until the invasion of Ukraine?  Ludicrous.  You also claimed over a year ago Biden's policies wouldn't result in inflation (the opposite) and again you were wrong.  Why is it your understanding of economic cause and affect never seem capable of correctly predicting future reality?  Perhaps it is time to reassess your understanding of economics?

 

US consumers still largely expect the current inflationary shock to be temporary, and for price gains to be low and stable in the longer run, according to a report released Thursday by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

 The survey, which confirmed earlier findings from the New York Fed, showed that while short-term inflation expectations are rising, consumers expect prices to rise by about 3% in five years. That suggests they expect the near-term surge in prices to fade over time, according to the researchers.

 “While short-term inflation expectations have continued to trend upward, medium-term inflation expectations appear to have reached a plateau over the past few months, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained remarkably stable,” the researchers wrote in a blog post that was co-authored by New York Fed President John Williams.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... f=lMtIv2Vb


 

Blackvegetable » 26 May 2022, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

26 May 2022, 4:40 pm

You talk about confirmation bias while asserting, without a shred of evidence, that inflation is Biden’s fault.

Before we go any further, why don't you tell me how much econ you have studied?

Answer the question honestly and we can discuss the specifics

I've forgotten more about economics than you have ever known.  I have studied economics at university and as a subject of intense interest for the last 35 years.  But even if I had never read a single sentence about the science of economics, the fact remains, I was and am able to predict the future results of economic policy, while you are ALWAYS 100% wrong.  If you had even a rudimentary understanding, you would think you would be able to predict outcomes at least SOME of the time.  You are always 100% wrong because your confirmation bias coerces you to make predictions based on your political leanings and you are backing an ideology which is also 100% wrong.

LibDave » 26 May 2022, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑

26 May 2022, 11:35 pm

I've forgotten more about economics than you have ever known.  I have studied economics at university and as a subject of intense interest for the last 35 years.  But even if I had never read a single sentence about the science of economics, the fact remains, I was and am able to predict the future results of economic policy, while you are ALWAYS 100% wrong.  If you had even a rudimentary understanding, you would think you would be able to predict outcomes at least SOME of the time.  You are always 100% wrong because your confirmation bias coerces you to make predictions based on your political leanings and you are backing an ideology which is also 100% wrong.

the fact remains, I was and am able to predict the future results of economic policy, while you are ALWAYS 100% wrong.

Really?

Have you ever voted for a POTUS  who bequeathed a smaller deficit to his successor than what he inherited?

If you had even a rudimentary understanding, you would think you would be able to predict outcomes at least SOME of the time. 

Why I never cast a vote for either "the worst of the modern era" or "worse than Buchanan".

You?

You are always 100% wrong because your confirmation bias coerces you to make predictions based on your political leanings and you are backing an ideology which is also 100% wrong.

Let's see how that looks after you answer.

I've forgotten more about economics than you have ever known.

I sure am glad there's a way to determine that.

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2022, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2022, 6:11 am

Morons!

You have the floor.

List all the things Jesse and Greg have told you will happen after November, and why you believe they will make a difference.

Don't make me call you sniveling cowards out by name.

Less govt spending 

lower taxes 
 

LibDave » 26 May 2022, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑

26 May 2022, 11:35 pm

I've forgotten more about economics than you have ever known.  I have studied economics at university and as a subject of intense interest for the last 35 years.  But even if I had never read a single sentence about the science of economics, the fact remains, I was and am able to predict the future results of economic policy, while you are ALWAYS 100% wrong.  If you had even a rudimentary understanding, you would think you would be able to predict outcomes at least SOME of the time.  You are always 100% wrong because your confirmation bias coerces you to make predictions based on your political leanings and you are backing an ideology which is also 100% wrong.

Does compounding results actually happen in series parallel conditions beyond economic theory in real time? Hint, DNA cycles occupying space as direct numbers to each species in this atmosphere.

Life balances ancestors better than you balance a social budget, more accurate per lifetime occupying space now.

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2022, 5:42 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2022, 5:42 am

I sure am glad there's a way to determine that.

 

You do a lot of talking about we, with it only being a me saying anything about collective minds following a specific mantra.

BuckNaked » 27 May 2022, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2022, 6:12 am

Less govt spending 

lower taxes

Buck,

You're a moron.

Look at the growth rate of spending under the hucksters whom you have gormlessly served..

Yea....I know....you have no idea where to look and can't do the math.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2022, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2022, 6:22 am

Buck,

You're a moron.

Look at the growth rate of spending under the hucksters whom you have gormlessly served..

Yea....I know....you have no idea where to look and can't do the math.

no more chyna virus checks no more handouts no student loan forgiveness 

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2022, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2022, 6:22 am

Buck,

You're a moron.

Look at the growth rate of spending under the hucksters whom you have gormlessly served..

Yea....I know....you have no idea where to look and can't do the math.

 I'm disturbed, I'm depressed, I'm inadequate. I've got it all!