Liberal Forum

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 10:35 am

Look at this piece of ****. As always, he demands others to take the floor, so he doesn't have to take a stand. He can just sit back and attack, rather than defend his own thoughts. 

God damn narcissists. I wish all of you would just **** die.

you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 

  

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 10:39 am

 

He continues to copy/paste me, thereby proving that he has no thoughts of his own. As predicted. 
100% accuracy.



Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 10:35 am

Look at this piece of ****. As always, he demands others to take the floor, so he doesn't have to take a stand. He can just sit back and attack, rather than defend his own thoughts. 

God damn narcissists. I wish all of you would just **** die.

lol don’t let him get under your skin 

BuckNaked » 08 Jul 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 10:47 am

lol don’t let him get under your skin

He never gets under my skin. Sometimes I have to talk like this to get him to at least consider offing himself.     

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 10:43 am

He continues to copy/paste me, thereby proving that he has no thoughts of his own. 

You have a definition of Survivorship bias - in my own words. 


You must be a moron.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:10 am

You have a definition of Survivorship bias - in my own words. 

You must be a moron.

Already went through this. Then use it to answer. 
1. You will now refer to your usual cop-out. 

So **** predictable. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:12 am

Already went through this. 

I told you that you are a moron some time ago...

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:21 am

I told you that you are a moron some time ago...

I proved that you were one some time ago...and then daily thereafter.

Proof? Sure:
"same eyes"
"To which thread are you referring?"

And that is just the start.  . 

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:38 am

I proved that you were one some time ago...and then daily thereafter.

Proof? Sure:
"same eyes"
"To which thread are you referring?"

And that is just the start.  .

Those are assertions....

This is evidence..

you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. 



Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:21 am

I told you that you are a moron some time ago...

The moron is the one who supported biden. Funny, how you supported biden back a few years ago, when you said he was breeding vaccine skepticism, and was promoting quack cures for his cultists....
 
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:44 am

Those are assertions....

This is evidence..

Assertions?                *******. No, they weren't. You said it, not me. 

Didn't read it. I will no longer read your copy/paste. Your words only...if you have any. 

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 10:43 am

He continues to copy/paste me, thereby proving that he has no thoughts of his own. As predicted. 
100% accuracy.



Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Inflation comes from the devalued dollar value eliminated by taxation of those using the common currency as an artificial value system socially.

Simple compounding use of the same dollar bills with a 6% sales tax becomes worthless after 16.25 uses by each transaction it was used.

And that can potentially happen every day. Guess where natural deficit comes from? Comparing every yesterday against current today pretending there is an actual tomorrow by context over content evolving working in series parallel time now.

I can within every exercise of relative time logistics debunk theory of time by actual time of adapting in space by personal hearts beating and each brain navigating by each ancestor alive daily here against what humanity uses against every ancestry by the ruling elite ancestors daily here.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:10 am

You have a definition of Survivorship bias - in my own words. 

You must be a moron.

There's still hope for you Bv...

 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QA-N9iTZnVs
 
 

MR-7 » 08 Jul 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:46 am

The moron is the one who supported biden. Funny, how you supported biden back a few years ago, when you said he was breeding vaccine skepticism, and was promoting quack cures for his cultists....

I feel no need to apologize for having voted for #13..

when you said he was breeding vaccine skepticism, and was promoting quack cures for his cultists....

 no...I said that the stupid should be shot.


 

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:49 am

Assertions?                *******. No, they weren't. You said it, not me. 

Didn't read it. I will no longer read your copy/paste. Your words only...if you have any.

And I won’t read any more of your drivel, either.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 12:10 pm

 no...I said that the stupid should be shot.

LIE all you want...but you said it. you said he was breeding vaccine skepticism and was promoting quack cures for his cultists....
 

MR-7 » 08 Jul 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 12:18 pm

LIE all you want...but you said it. you said he was breeding vaccine skepticism and was promoting quack cures for his cultists....

I don't answer to what you believe you remember. 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 12:19 pm

I don't answer to what you believe you remember.

I accept your defeat. You said it, and you know it.
 

MR-7 » 08 Jul 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 12:22 pm

I accept your defeat. You said it, and you know it.

Are you referring to Grifty pitching the bleach cure?

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 12:12 pm

And I won’t read any more of your drivel, either.

How about answering? oh wait...I forgot who I was talking to.