Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?
If Inflation Is A Result Of Bad Policy, What Policies Is The GOP Proposing To Whip Inflation Now?
By Blackvegetable
12 Apr 2022 6:11 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 Dec 2025 9:07 am
Beekeeper » 17 Dec 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ NO LINK NEEDED, DICKSUCK!!
- Total Jobs Added: The U.S. economy added approximately 14.6 million nonfarm jobs from January 2021 to January 2024 (a three-year period), with the total exceeding 15 million during his full term ending January 2025. This is the largest number of jobs added during the first three years of any presidential administration.
- Job Creation vs. Recovery: A significant portion of these gains (around 11 million) represents the recovery of jobs lost during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns, which mostly occurred under the previous administration in early 2020. Critics argue that these should be counted as "recovered" rather than newly "created" jobs.
which mostly occurred under the previous administration in early 2020.
So, you lied about this...
17 Dec 2025 9:07 am
Can you?
Prove it.
17 Dec 2025 9:11 am
Nope.
Bye-DUMB/KommieLA had one of the WORST ECONOMIC 4 YEARS in over a CENTURY!!
THAT fact is irrefutable!! PERIOD!!
~20.5% PRICE INCREASE ON EVERYTHING isn't "success" DICKSUCK!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
17 Dec 2025 9:12 am
Overall, 64% of Americans think the country is on the wrong track, which is up from 60% at the beginning of the year. Republicans and MAGA members were 6 points more likely to say the country is on the wrong track than in August, NBC News said about the survey results.
Trump approval rating down among MAGA base in new opinion poll
https://share.google/u7YuhJg6TV625sl6o
Trump approval rating down among MAGA base in new opinion poll
https://share.google/u7YuhJg6TV625sl6o
17 Dec 2025 9:17 am
You were asked first to define the term woman over a year ago... you still haven't defined the term. Why are you so afraid to define the term woman?
17 Dec 2025 9:32 am
The "lie" is your stupid attempt to claim that a person FORCED to stay home from their job by Democrats who ordered the shutdown DOES NOT COUNT as getting a new job when simply being allowed to return to the same job he had previously!
The second biggest fallacy is that the jobs created by demented idiot you love do anything to help the economy with his 1.6 million new GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATS, which do NOTHING beneficial to the economy! They are a far bigger detriment to the country than jobs created by the private sector, because all they do is increase costs to the country through more regulations, fees, and taxes that must be offset by private businesses in their REAL job creation. Does anyone think that the tens of thousands of new IRS ARMED IRS agents could possibly be a benefit to businesses?
17 Dec 2025 9:38 am
Notice how the *** changes the subject when he is proven wrong?Beekeeper » 17 Dec 2025, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑ Fondler,
60k/mo
Biden was over 200, for 48 months....
REHIRING the people LAID OFF because of Bye-DUMB's economic SHUTDOWN over a COLD VIRUS is hardly "job creation", *******!!
17 Dec 2025 9:41 am
Zeet,Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ The "lie" is your stupid attempt to claim that a person FORCED to stay home from their job by Democrats who ordered
No citations.
17 Dec 2025 11:06 am
If Trump’s request for divine intervention falls flat, the administration will, in fairly short order, have to figure out a way to salvage the president’s signature economic policy initiative. For months, top administration officials like Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett have brushed off the prospect of a loss at the Supreme Court by claiming that they will simply use other trade statutes to replace the tariffs that have been issued under the purported authority of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Their outward nonchalance raises some obvious questions, not the least of which are why, if they are right, the president is asking God to step in, or why the administration spent all year using the wrong legal authority to support the president’s policy initiative. Their seeming indifference, however, also obscures the new legal and political obstacles that the Trump administration would confront. The fallback effort would not be as simple or straightforward a matter as they have claimed.
But another reason — one that has gotten comparatively little attention — is that the companies may not fully trust the Trump administration to manage the refund process in good faith without judicial oversight, according to Timothy Meyer, a law professor and expert on international trade law whom I first spoke with shortly after the very first round of IEEPA tariffs in February. In October, he published a white paper on what could happen if the Supreme Court rules against the Trump administration. In particular, Meyer told me, Bessent and other members of the administration have spent months telling the public and the courts that refunding the IEEPA tariffs would lead to a fiscal calamity. The efforts by Bessent and others “to use refunds as a weapon in the litigation, kind of ham-handedly,” Meyer said, “has really just eviscerated any confidence that anyone would have that the administrative process would be administered efficiently, quickly and in good faith.”
Trump Is Raging at a Looming Supreme Court Loss on Tariffs. He’s Got a Point. - POLITICO
https://share.google/lkYVWTOsrOmgtShtp
Their outward nonchalance raises some obvious questions, not the least of which are why, if they are right, the president is asking God to step in, or why the administration spent all year using the wrong legal authority to support the president’s policy initiative. Their seeming indifference, however, also obscures the new legal and political obstacles that the Trump administration would confront. The fallback effort would not be as simple or straightforward a matter as they have claimed.
But another reason — one that has gotten comparatively little attention — is that the companies may not fully trust the Trump administration to manage the refund process in good faith without judicial oversight, according to Timothy Meyer, a law professor and expert on international trade law whom I first spoke with shortly after the very first round of IEEPA tariffs in February. In October, he published a white paper on what could happen if the Supreme Court rules against the Trump administration. In particular, Meyer told me, Bessent and other members of the administration have spent months telling the public and the courts that refunding the IEEPA tariffs would lead to a fiscal calamity. The efforts by Bessent and others “to use refunds as a weapon in the litigation, kind of ham-handedly,” Meyer said, “has really just eviscerated any confidence that anyone would have that the administrative process would be administered efficiently, quickly and in good faith.”
Trump Is Raging at a Looming Supreme Court Loss on Tariffs. He’s Got a Point. - POLITICO
https://share.google/lkYVWTOsrOmgtShtp
17 Dec 2025 11:09 am
17 Dec 2025 12:36 pm
One of these days you might finally realize how much I LOVE to hear you doubt the facts I provide, so that I get yet another opportunity to make you look even more ignorant than you are by shoving the facts up your dumb ***, knowing how you're certain to demand those citations you're so ill-informed of!
And as I'm sure you're additionally unaware of the facts, most of those jobs that were "created" under Biden DID NOT go to American citizens born here but to immigrants, both legal and illegal:Fact-Checking Team Biden on Who Those 87,000 New IRS Agents Would Audit
Heritage Foundation Aug 12, 2022
Calculations conservatively assume that only 57.3% of the Treasury Department’s estimated 86,852 new IRS agents (49,754 in total) would be assigned to enforcement, based on $45.6 billion of the bill’s $79.6 billion increase for the Internal Revenue Service dedicated to enforcement.Calculations also assume that 8.9% of IRS enforcement agents would be assigned to corporate audits, based on the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate that corporations account for 8.9% of the tax gap. Enforcement agents are assumed to spend 75% of their paid time auditing tax returns. Despite the Biden administration’s claims, it’s almost certain that households making less than $400,000 a year would face increased audits under Democrats’ bill. And that seems to be the true intent of the IRS. According to a 2021 report from the Government Accountability Office, “From fiscal years 2010 to 2021, the majority of the additional taxes IRS recommended from audits came from taxpayers with incomes below $200,000.”
- The Biden administration's job growth was partly due to efforts to rebuild the federal workforce, which had been reduced during the previous administration.
- The Bureau of Labor Statistics has faced scrutiny for inaccuracies in job reporting, leading to revisions that sometimes showed fewer jobs than initially reported.
Maybe someday you'll begin to recognize the value of this axiom:New January Data Still Shows Most Job Growth Going to Immigrants; 88% since 2020, 72% in the last year
Also, a near-record share of working-age US-born men remain out of the labor force
Center for Immigration Studies By Steven A. Camarota on February 7, 2025
The January 2025 household survey, released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is the first to be weighted by the government to better reflect the huge surge in illegal immigration in the past 4 years. The new data shows that since January 2020, 88 percent of all employment growth has gone to immigrants (legal and illegal), also referred to as the foreign-born. All this at a time when a near-record share of working-age U.S.-born men remain out of the labor force.
When you're completely ignorant of the facts, it's wiser to keep your mouth shut than to attempt to impugn it!
But I highly doubt it!
17 Dec 2025 12:43 pm
Can you post a graph.....he likes those squiggly lines, 'specially the colored one's.Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ One of these days you might finally realize how much I LOVE to hear you doubt the facts I provide, so that I get yet another opportunity to make you look even more ignorant than you are by shoving the facts up your dumb ***, knowing how you're certain to demand those citations you're so ill-informed of!
And as I'm sure you're additionally unaware of the facts, most of those jobs that were "created" under Biden DID NOT go to American citizens born here but to immigrants, both legal and illegal:
Maybe someday you'll begin to recognize the value of this axiom:
When you're completely ignorant of the facts, it's wiser to keep your mouth shut than to attempt to impugn it!
But I highly doubt it!
17 Dec 2025 12:46 pm
Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ One of these days you might finally realize how much I LOVE to hear you doubt the facts I provide, so that I get yet another opportunity to make you look even more ignorant than you are by shoving the facts up your dumb ***, knowing how you're certain to demand those citations you're so ill-informed of!
And as I'm sure you're additionally unaware of the facts, most of those jobs that were "created" under Biden DID NOT go to American citizens born here but to immigrants, both legal and illegal:
Maybe someday you'll begin to recognize the value of this axiom:
When you're completely ignorant of the facts, it's wiser to keep your mouth shut than to attempt to impugn it!
But I highly doubt it!
Heritage?
Negro, please...
17 Dec 2025 12:53 pm
What's the problem, dickhead?
Can't find any of your vaunted "citations" that disprove their statistics?
You're choosing not to believe the Center for Immigration Studies, the General Accounting Office and the Congressional Budget Office because you don't like the facts they report?
17 Dec 2025 12:57 pm
Two More Heritage Foundation Trustees Resign Over Support for Tucker CarlsonZeets2 » 17 Dec 2025, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ What's the problem, dickhead?
Can't find any of your vaunted "citations" that disprove their statistics?
You're choosing not to believe the Center for Immigration Studies, the General Accounting Office and the Congressional Budget Office because you don't like the facts they report?
17 Dec 2025 1:04 pm
Non-sequitur.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Two More Heritage Foundation Trustees Resign Over Support for Tucker Carlson
What has that got to do with the facts provided by the GAO and the CBO?
Or is your mind just wandering away once again?
17 Dec 2025 1:08 pm
No...because Hertage is crap.Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Non-sequitur.
What has that got to do with the facts provided by the GAO and the CBO?
Or is your mind just wandering away once again?
17 Dec 2025 2:03 pm
So genius that you are, you believe Heritage to be incapable of taking the numbers they're given by the CBO and the GAO and simply drawing the conclusion that they show?
So why don't you dispute THEIR numbers and not the credibility of Heritage?
If you've got proof they're wrong, SHOW IT!
If not, then SHUT THE **** UP because all you're doing is proving what an ignorant buffoon you truly are!
17 Dec 2025 2:34 pm
Do you recall ever acknowledging a fact that vaporized a Stream of Bullzeet?Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ So genius that you are, you believe Heritage to be incapable of taking the numbers they're given by the CBO and the GAO and simply drawing the conclusion that they show?
So why don't you dispute THEIR numbers and not the credibility of Heritage?
If you've got proof they're wrong, SHOW IT!
If not, then SHUT THE **** UP because all you're doing is proving what an ignorant buffoon you truly are!
17 Dec 2025 3:00 pm
Nope! When I post indisputable facts that you refuse to acknowledge, I blame only your sheer, stubborn ignorance which is enhanced by the terminal TDS that you clearly suffer from .Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you recall ever acknowledging a fact that vaporized a Stream of Bullzeet?
Nothing else!
Who is online
In total there are 5684 users online :: 14 registered, 16 bots, and 5654 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, MR-7, Beekeeper, jerra b, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: Pandalytics, facebookexternalhit, Pinterest, Kinza, DuckDuckBot, DuckDuckGo, Baiduspider, ADmantX, CriteoBot, YandexBot, proximic, bingbot, Googlebot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7