I know. Think you are seeing it backwards or a tad myopic but can understand the prerogative. Unions using disadvantaged people to control industry predated golden era Detroit.Hank » 06 Sep 2022, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I disagree with that entirely ...
When you get blacks into a position where it is almost impossible to be fired they literally quit working. That was the problems having blacks take union jobs in Detroit. They were protected by the unions and almost impossible to fire and even harder to replace since the white flight took place shortly after the great migration.
The big three said **** it and left town.
Detroit filed for bankruptcy in 1957, not even two decades after the great migration north.
Pastafarian » 06 Sep 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ That’s only bcuz your generation unleashed that filth.
But you’ll be oblivious to it all so you won’t even be able to maniacally laugh about it.

Xavier_Onassis » 06 Sep 2022, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ There are many ways that rich people became richer in this country, Not only plantation owners, exploiting slaves, but also McDonald's exploiting (originally) teenagers. Also, driving the Indians off their land, paying Central American immigrants low wages to dismember chickens, pigs and cattle. Peddling drinking water at $1.00 a bottle for water from the municipal wells people have paid to develop.
Some how Pastafarian believes these young kids are posing with pistols is the fault of systemic racism as well as my fault because I'm whiteDeplorablePatriot » 06 Sep 2022, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ No, that's because of a cap in your axe, along wiff everyone else.
I wish Lincoln would have never got dicked down by Fredrick Douglas and changed his mind about forcing all slaves to hati and Liberia
Oh boy being the house servant was a privilege.
Their ancestors would have still been sold into slavery... Maybe probably bought up by the Ottoman empire ...Neo » 14 Apr 2022, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ The topic is literally about money. Slavery wasn't a net positive for the American economy. It's aftermath far exceeds any conceivable benefit. On a human level, the descendants of slaves have immeasurably better qualities of life than they would have had their ancestors remained in Africa.
Most would have been slaughtered, the rest worked to death. Slavery gave tribal battlefield captures value.Hank » 07 Sep 2022, 1:54 am » wrote: ↑ Their ancestors would have still been sold into slavery... Maybe probably bought up by the Ottoman empire ...
But what about the children?Neo » 07 Sep 2022, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑ Most would have been slaughtered, the rest worked to death. Slavery gave tribal battlefield captures value.
Did you know, the New York Times got huge by using underpaid paper boys? Child **** labor made them!!
So, what kind of life would you have with out the corporations ?Pastafarian » 15 Apr 2022, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑ Sure, slavery has been part of America to this day.
During Jim Crow, black folks were paid less for the same work a white man did.
Today, low minimum wage enslaved the poor while corporations make record profits.
You mean all of those southern plantation owners who had all of their wealth stripped from them without compensation? This was a violation of the 5th Amendment. The slave owners were never compensated for their freed slaves. Those reparations are real and must be actually be paid to the descendants of slave owners, under our laws and Constitution. So, descendants of slaves can go F-off.
There's nothing repressed about your gayness.slideman » 13 Apr 2022, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ So we have another repressed latent gay.
Seems like the entire right wing is repressed latent gay people.
when one acts immorally expect consequences.Skans » 31 Jan 2023, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ You mean all of those southern plantation owners who had all of their wealth stripped from them without compensation? This was a violation of the 5th Amendment. The slave owners were never compensated for their freed slaves. Those reparations are real and must be actually be paid to the descendants of slave owners, under our laws and Constitution. So, descendants of slaves can go F-off.
Working people should be paid accordingly. When production and profits go up so should working people’s wages.Majik » 31 Jan 2023, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ So, what kind of life would you have with out the corporations ?
You have what is called issues...
where you think the Walmart employee should be paid equal to that of a corporate worker with a degree ....
you live in lala land ....that land of make believe where you have put yourself on a pedestal but have no real merit to justify higher wages ......
Pastafarian » 02 Feb 2023, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ when one acts immorally expect consequences.
Their wealth stripped is karma for stripping people of their dignity and culture.
Sucks to be an owner of people, ****.
I’m sure he was stripped as well.
There is very little, if ANY "old money" in this nation today. So you beliefs are rooted in stupidity and conjecture. Take your garbage thread and leave, you liar. You are no more a "psychologist" than Mickey Mouse is.Pastafarian » 02 Feb 2023, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑ I’m sure he was stripped as well.
You going to cry for him too, cum drain?