Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Elon Musk owns Twitter!
Elon Musk owns Twitter!
By Warcok
25 Apr 2022 2:13 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Apr 2022 3:41 pm
It doesn't get any more "inclusive" than GAB.Olivaw » 26 Apr 2022, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ GAB is a far right site.
It is possible to create an inclusive free speech site that does not erroneously dismiss the American Civil Liberties Union as "free speech hating people"?
Prove me wrong you free speech hating and truth hating piece of ****...!!
26 Apr 2022 3:44 pm
Olivaw » 26 Apr 2022, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ GAB is a far right site.
It is possible to create an inclusive free speech site that does not erroneously dismiss the American Civil Liberties Union as "free speech hating people"?
save the best of the worst....great idea!...but the American Civil Liberties Union is just another progressive infected organization the doesn't deserve to be saved....kind of like the UN
26 Apr 2022 3:47 pm
Don't hate them for defending speech that YOU disagree with.
26 Apr 2022 3:50 pm
Funny as hell.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Apr 2022 3:52 pm
That brillo-headed **** ain't just "upset."Beekeeper » 26 Apr 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑
And THIS moron talks out of BOTH SIDES OF HER MOUTH and thinks we should just let it go!!!
How MORONIC is this??
So, TWINKY, are you UPSET or NOT UPSET???
He's melting down in real time over a guy he doesn't know buying a board he doesn't use.
That is how easy subsaharans are to manipulate - and the dems have their hooks in the dumbs.
(My apology for adding the silent b to dumb - probably gonna confuse the dumb delanamore).
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Apr 2022 3:58 pm
Media bias factcheck rates in center right to right, ya hyperventilating ***.
You queers only have one speed - you're with us, or you're an alt-right nazi. You suck.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-joe- ... ence-bias/
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Apr 2022 4:00 pm
nefarious101 » 26 Apr 2022, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ save the best of the worst....great idea!...but the American Civil Liberties Union is just another progressive infected organization the doesn't deserve to be saved....kind of like the UN
Would have argued that with you, two years ago. But I've been busy - and so has the ACLU.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Apr 2022 4:10 pm
Stalin manipulated the culture of his time (rising Marxism/Leninism) to gain massive wealth and power. So did Musk and Bezos (entrenched corrupted capitalism)Cannonpointer » 26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ In the immediate circumstance, I have no argument against your position. I'm asking about Musk's role in our society in a larger context, and I am arguing that he is a mightly leaky vessel for the right to be loading with the precious cargo of its aspirations for a more just society. He's a money boy - part of the problem, not part of the solution.
It seems to me that today's conservative is quickly evolving to be a post-Reagan conservative. This notion that one fellow has a "right" to hundreds of billions because he "earned" them seems to be waning in the conservative world view. At least, I hope it is. At some point, people need to grow up and acknowledge that no one person is providing more value than the country of Lichtenstein or the country of Bulgaria - not in the world of ratonal adults.
There are 211 countries on the planet. Only the top 11 produce in the trillions. All of the rest, save Turks and Caicos, produce in the billions (they produce in the hundreds of millions). The top 53 produce above 200 billion. That means that Elon Musk's net worth is above the annual production of 158 nation states. Arguably, quite a number more. I am only placing his net worth at 200 billion - and as I understand it, the number is considerably higher. So the question arises: I this incredible (pre-Reagan unthinkable) disparity a product of a just system, or the product of pillage? And if it is the product of pillage, is Elon Musk not then by definition a pillager? And if he is a pillager, how, then, ought we to look at him as a friend of the working man - a person whose interests converge with those of working families?
The Democrats represented working families under FDR - right through to Clinton. Then they found their "third way." And they abandoned their base, becoming friends of wall street. They scooched the Republicans and shared a bench for a bit. And now, the Republicans have been scooched mightily - to the point that democrats are getting a great deal more wall street money than Republicans. And so it behooves the Republican party to make a choice. It is my hope that the Republican party will follow the lead of folks like DeSantis and Perry, and begin responding to the needs and interests of working families - the abandoned base of the Democrat party. And to do that effectively, they need to be internally consistent in their thinking - not serving two masters. I believe that the Elon Musk phenomenon is the very embodiment of the psychological predicment in which the Republican party finds itself. And you can see the schizophrenia of today's Republican writ large in this issue. Musk is "our" Soros - so he's a good guy. Soros is "their" Musk - so he's a bad guy.
Musk and Soros are two of a kind - that is my argument in a nutshell. Neither is a friend of working families.
Did any of them "earn " It? No, they were just clever and cultivated the right connections
The pretense that someone could possibly "earn" $billions is ****. Earning implies work, productive labor paid in equal value.
26 Apr 2022 5:41 pm
The progressive idiocracy trots out all the great organizations and awards of the past as if they were still great organizations and awards....they are not!!Cannonpointer » 26 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Would have argued that with you, two years ago. But I've been busy - and so has the ACLU.
The idiocrats have ruined or are in the process of ruining everything of value.
26 Apr 2022 5:52 pm
It also implies that some people have taken risks to create products and make their dreams a reality. As much as I despise what Bill Gates has become, are you saying that his ability to design Windows that helped put a pc into most homes around the world didn't "earn" his billions? Are you aware that Apple began in a garage with a couple of guys who dreamed of what their computers were capable of?SJConspirator » 26 Apr 2022, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Stalin manipulated the culture of his time to gain massive wealth and power. So did Musk and Bezos.
Did any of them "earn " It? No, they were just clever and cultivated the right connections
The pretense that someone could possibly "earn" $billions is ****. Earning implies work, productive labor paid in equal value.
Your diagnosis reeks of jealousy because feeble minds like yours were unwilling or mentally incapable to take the risks that they and dozens of others like them did that EARNED them their billions!
Does calling their work "****" make you feel smarter?
26 Apr 2022 6:24 pm
Are you questionng the value of a Nobel Peace Prize, sir?nefarious101 » 26 Apr 2022, 5:41 pm » wrote: ↑ The progressive idiocracy trots out all the great organizations and awards of the past as if they were still great organizations and awards....they are not!!
The idiocrats have ruined or are in the process of ruining everything of value.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Apr 2022 6:27 pm
We weren't talking about Joe Rogan, you sad excuse for a turtle penis.Cannonpointer » 26 Apr 2022, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Media bias factcheck rates in center right to right, ya hyperventilating ***.
You queers only have one speed - you're with us, or you're an alt-right nazi. You suck.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-joe- ... ence-bias/
You frightened reactionaries have only one speed - you're with us or you're a transgender homosexual. You suck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network)
26 Apr 2022 6:37 pm
No, ***, you were lying about GAB - and you got your *** busted my media bias factcheck.Olivaw » 26 Apr 2022, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑ We weren't talking about Joe Rogan, you sad excuse for a turtle penis.
Suck on it, weakness.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Apr 2022 10:31 pm
Stalin manipulated the culture of his time (rising Marxism/Leninism) to gain massive wealth and power. So did Musk and Bezos (entrenched corrupted capitalism)
Did any of them "earn " It? No, they were just clever and cultivated the right connections
The pretense that someone could possibly "earn" $billions is ****.
earn
verb
obtain (money) in return for labor or services
Someone please explain to me what value the oligarchs provide that is legitimately worth hundreds of $billions.
Did any of them "earn " It? No, they were just clever and cultivated the right connections
The pretense that someone could possibly "earn" $billions is ****.
earn
verb
obtain (money) in return for labor or services
Someone please explain to me what value the oligarchs provide that is legitimately worth hundreds of $billions.
26 Apr 2022 11:59 pm
Wong again, livestocker licker. You linked to Joe Rogan, not GAB Social.Cannonpointer » 26 Apr 2022, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑ No, ***, you were lying about GAB - and you got your *** busted my media bias factcheck.
Suck on it, weakness.
if you're going to double down on your lie, at least try not to look like an ignorant clod. This a relevant link.
Bolding mine.The majority of the content on Gab is related to politics.[14][15] Gab has been widely described as a haven for neo-Nazis, racists, white supremacists, white nationalists, the alt-right, antisemites, supporters of Donald Trump, conservatives, right-libertarians, and conspiracy theorists like QAnon.[3][4][8][16][17][18][19][20][21] Gab has attracted users and groups who have been banned from other social media platforms and users seeking alternatives to mainstream social media platforms.[22]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network)
27 Apr 2022 1:17 am
27 Apr 2022 5:48 am
"Report: Twitter’s Leftist Top Lawyer Cried over Elon Musk Purchase"TB7 » 25 Apr 2022, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑Elon Musk is eclectic in everything he does, but this is among the most awesome of moves. He says he isn't doing it for his own benefits, other than freedom of speech. He said that democracy cannot exist without free speech. He is right. Now that he has bought it, time to clean the house. I think the real reason liberals are so worked up over Elon Musk gaining control of Twitter is that once he is in charge, he will be able to expose for public review, the algorithms that they have been using to censor, any coordination between Twitter, Facebook and Google, and especially what was in place before the 2020 election.WE WIN..NEXT UP......FACEBOOK!
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2022/04/ ... -purchase/
27 Apr 2022 6:14 am
27 Apr 2022 6:46 am
GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Apr 2022, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Ever been to GAB SOCIAL...?
I think the only lines they draw is at inciting violence and doing harm.
There are some Negro Bloggers at GAB who are pretty "squared away" and have EARNED THE RESPECT OF THE WHITE MEMBER / READERS so I think the use of the word *** is self regulated by others who don't want to offend our black friends over there.
I think all Musk needs to do is use GAB's [Andrew Torba's] example.
BTW..GAB is under constant attack from the usual, truth hating / free speech hating people [SPLC, JADL, ACLU, RWW, etc.]
Just got this from Gab...
27 Apr 2022 6:49 am
Cannonpointer » 26 Apr 2022, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you questionng the value of a Nobel Peace Prize, sir?
nope...not question it.....just condemning it outright
Who is online
In total there are 6552 users online :: 5 registered, 14 bots, and 6533 guests
Bots: Bolt, CensysInspect, ADmantX, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, Googlebot, proximic, Applebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, okhttp, bingbot, Baiduspider