You mean "BIZARRE EXTREMIST TRUTH HATE" like if someone said..."RACE IS IMAGINARY..IT DOES NOT EXIST"...Olivaw » 27 Apr 2022, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ You overestimate the power of your speech.
Have you ever been at a social and somebody says something bizarre? Everybody looks uncomfortable. It's not that they are offended, it's that they are embarrassed for the person who verbally blundered.
You folks are welcome to reinforce one another's opinion at your extremist sites. Just don't expect the rest of us to seek it out. It's embarrassing to watch.

**** TRUMPER SCUM ARE THE SNOWFLAKE SHEEPLE.GHETTOBLASTER » 27 Apr 2022, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You mean "BIZARRE EXTREMIST TRUTH HATE" like if someone said..."RACE IS IMAGINARY..IT DOES NOT EXIST"...![]()
BTW..are you still laughing at all of those TRUMPANZEE and ORANGE ORAGUTAN JOKES ?
Exactly. Race is a social construct but social constructs exist. It was used to justify the exclusion of blacks from constitutional protections. I'm embarrassed for anybody who claims that race does not exist,GHETTOBLASTER » 27 Apr 2022, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You mean "BIZARRE EXTREMIST TRUTH HATE" like if someone said..."RACE IS IMAGINARY..IT DOES NOT EXIST"...![]()
BTW..are you still laughing at all of those TRUMPANZEE and ORANGE ORAGUTAN JOKES ?
Olivaw » 27 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly. Race is a social construct but social constructs exist. It was used to justify the exclusion of blacks from constitutional protections. I'm embarrassed for anybody who claims that race does not exist,
The populist buffoon who fell backwards into the WH isn't funny.

It will be interesting to see how Twitter fares as a relevant social platform if these predicted changes materialize. Elon always swings for the fence.Sometimes he hits. Sometimes he misses.impartialobserver » 27 Apr 2022, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is what Elon Musk plans to do. Whether or not, it will not happen.. is anybody's guess. I like the idea of allowing users to edit their tweets once they have created and posted it.
https://www.npr.org/2022/04/25/10946712 ... tter-plans
I can't really say. Am not a twitter fan or user and do not really use social media except facebook. Even then I only use it to get info on my hobbies... craft beer and rock music.Olivaw » 27 Apr 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ It will be interesting to see how Twitter fares as a relevant social platform if these predicted changes materialize. Elon always swings for the fence? Sometimes he hits. Sometimes he misses.
Yeah, cranial measurements were used to argue that men were smarter than women. Boy, that argument was a miserable failure, wasn't it?
I'm not a Twitter user either but it is quoted a lot. I occasionally enjoy reading collections of funny tweets and my daughter forwards the odd tweet to me.impartialobserver » 27 Apr 2022, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't really say. Am not a twitter fan or user and do not really use social media except facebook. Even then I only use it to get info on my hobbies... craft beer and rock music.
The examples I show of evolutionary differences of skull shape have nothing to do with the [head to body ratio] study you mention here.Olivaw » 27 Apr 2022, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, cranial measurements were used to argue that men were smarter than women. Boy, that argument was a miserable failure, wasn't it?
One reason that few people want to engage with you far right wingers is that you say absurd things and think you have made a valid point.GHETTOBLASTER » 27 Apr 2022, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑ The examples I show of evolutionary differences of skull shape have nothing to do with the [head to body ratio] study you mention here.
Stick to subjects that you at least know something about.
Obviously you have no factual counterpoint and this is your cowardly surrender.Olivaw » 27 Apr 2022, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ One reason that few people want to engage with you far right wingers is that you say absurd things and think you have made a valid point.![]()
Goodbye.
Olivaw » 27 Apr 2022, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ One reason that few people want to engage with you far right wingers is that you say absurd things and think you have made a valid point.![]()
Goodbye.
GASLIGHT THIS YOU **** LOSER...!!!!

YOU'RE the loser, asswipe. But hey, if your imaginary racial superiority is something you need to help get your sorry *** through the night, then GO FOR IT. Wimp.GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Apr 2022, 12:05 am » wrote: ↑ GASLIGHT THIS YOU **** LOSER...!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
List of people considered father or mother of a scientific field - Wikipedia
GHETTOBLASTER » 27 Apr 2022, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑ The examples I show of evolutionary differences of skull shape have nothing to do with the [head to body ratio] study you mention here.
Stick to subjects that you at least know something about.