B.See » 28 Apr 2022, 3:44 am » wrote: ↑ BULLETIN: "Fascist right gets hopeful of a Twitter platform full of UNBRIDLED HATE, LIES AND DISINFORMATION." News at eleven:
Elon Musk's attacks on Twitter employees aren't just scary--they breach his purchase agreement
Elon Musk starts encouraging abuse of Twitter executives the day after purchase deal announced
Ben Shapiro: Elon Musk Doesn’t Need Liberal Twitter Staff Or Liberal Twitter Users
From the DEPT. HEADING IN THE REICH DIRECTION:
Wonkette Watch a Tesla Model X self-drive into an airplane, keep going | Autoblog
He's a billionaire. He doesn't have to **** skanks.DennisTheMenace » 28 Apr 2022, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑
Pretty soon...he'll be **** Kim Kardashian and run for president.
Wha wha wha????B.See » 02 May 2022, 5:27 am » wrote: ↑NWOR
Mass Deactivations Have Taken Place On Twitter Following Elon Musk's Takeover
Elon Musk reportedly wants to start charging for tweets | The Independent
MEANWHILE:
Black Telsa Employee Files Racial Discrimination Lawsuit | The Latest Hip-Hop News, Music and Media | Hip-Hop Wired
Black employee hits Tesla with third racial discrimination lawsuit this year - Raw Story
"WE ARE THE PARTY OF SCIENCE"..except when it conflicts with our wishful thinking based hopes and beliefs that were formed while we watched 10,000 hours worth of [[[MY LITTLE PONY]]].Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Apparently, they were constructed that way.
Socially and whatnot.
It's "science." Don't measure, don't quantify - just believe.

Yep!! NUTTIN like getting a NAZI SCUM admit they are nothing more than the LYING SACKS OF **** they are!!!supraTruth » 04 May 2022, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑ YEAH, YOUR 1-WAY RNC NAZI SCUM LET U **** **** RNC TOOLS POST!
CANCEL CULTURE RNC SCUM @PootyFauxNews PICK SIDES WHO THEY BAN! HYPOCRITES LIKE ALL **** tCONBeekeeper » 04 May 2022, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Yep!! NUTTIN like getting a NAZI SCUM admit they are nothing more than the LYING SACKS OF **** they are!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You have the right to share your opinions.Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Listen to the fascist ****** argue against free speech, while lacking the balls to say so.
If WE CONSIDER it "hateful or ugly," WE should be able to censor it - that is her position.
U TEACH YOUR SON RACIST HATE TOO, & DID U GIVE HIM AN ASSAULT RIFLE FOR CHRISTMAS? HOW LONG BEFORE HE MAKES U A PROUD DAD BY MURDERING THOSE U BOTH HATE SO MUCH?Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Listen to the fascist ****** argue against free speech, while lacking the balls to say so.
If WE CONSIDER it "hateful or ugly," WE should be able to censor it - that is her position.
And you have the right to embrace censorship, fruity.Olivaw » 16 May 2022, 1:08 am » wrote: ↑ You have the right to share your opinions.
I have an equal right to emit a robust belly laugh at the idiocy of them.
That's freedom, you silly little man.
Does your confusion stem from a misunderstanding of censorship as it relates to the Constitution? It applies to the government and the government alone. Even there, there are instances in which the government can curtail speech.Cannonpointer » 16 May 2022, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ And you have the right to embrace censorship, fruity.
But the only thing we laugh at is your stupidity.
https://www.carnegielibrary.org/the-fir ... ensorship/Censorship by the government is unconstitutional. When the government engages in censorship, it goes against the First Amendment rights discussed above. However, there are still examples of government censorship in our history (see the 1873 Comstock Law and the 1996 Communications Decency Act), and the Supreme Court is often called upon to ensure that First Amendment rights are being protected.
Private individuals and groups still often engage in censorship. As long as government entities are not involved, this type of censorship technically presents no First Amendment implications. Many of us are familiar with the censoring of popular music, movies, and art to exclude words or images that are considered “vulgar” or “obscene.” While many of these forms of censorship are technically legal, private groups like the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) work to make sure that the right to free speech is honored.
Nobody has a right not to be offended...Olivaw » 16 May 2022, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Does your confusion stem from a misunderstanding of censorship? It applies to the government and the government alone. Even there, there are instances in which the government can curtail speech.
Beyond that:
- No private entity can be compelled to provide a platform for unfettered speech.
- Nobody is obliged to listen to your bizarre utterances, let alone give them credence.
- A platform that allows ugliness to thrive risks marginalizion by the decent majority.
So go stand on your soapbox and scream inanities into the wind, for all I care. I'll just walk past quickly and avoid eye contact.
you're wrong, but tell it to right wing snowflakes who collapse in tear filled terror if anyone says the words "white privilege".
supraTruth 2,288Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Listen to the fascist ****** argue against free speech, while lacking the balls to say so.
If WE CONSIDER it "hateful or ugly," WE should be able to censor it - that is her position.
U TEACH YOUR SON RACIST HATE TOO, & DID U GIVE HIM AN ASSAULT RIFLE FOR CHRISTMAS? HOW LONG BEFORE HE MAKES U A PROUD DAD BY MURDERING THOSE U BOTH HATE SO MUCH?Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑Listen to the fascist ****** argue against free speech, while lacking the balls to say so.
If WE CONSIDER it "hateful or ugly," WE should be able to censor it - that is her position.
-1
Cannonpointer-1Today, 3:53 pm There is no such thing as "the Left" when it comes to personal decision. Perhaps, some will leave, certainly others will stay. As for me, I have never bothered with Twitter.roadkill » 25 Apr 2022, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ We'll have to wait and see.
But the left has already said they'll leave Twitter if Elon wins.
Elon just won!
Americans are just tired of yourZ09 » 25 Apr 2022, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't you love these people?
They say it's a "threat to democracy" when in fact they refuse to hear anyone else's opinion.
I'LL BE ABLE TO RETURN & **** IN YOUR FAT ASSEDroadkill » 25 Apr 2022, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ We'll have to wait and see.
But the left has already said they'll leave Twitter if Elon wins.
Elon just won!

supraTruth » 16 May 2022, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑ supraTruth 2,288
Today, 6:36 am
U TEACH YOUR SON RACIST HATE TOO, & DID U GIVE HIM AN ASSAULT RIFLE FOR CHRISTMAS? HOW LONG BEFORE HE MAKES U A PROUD DAD BY MURDERING THOSE U BOTH HATE SO MUCH?
-1
Cannonpointer-1Today, 3:53 pm
supraTruth 2,288Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑Listen to the fascist ****** argue against free speech, while lacking the balls to say so.
If WE CONSIDER it "hateful or ugly," WE should be able to censor it - that is her position.
U TEACH YOUR SON RACIST HATE TOO, & DID U GIVE HIM AN ASSAULT RIFLE FOR CHRISTMAS? HOW LONG BEFORE HE MAKES U A PROUD DAD BY MURDERING THOSE U BOTH HATE SO MUCH?Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑Listen to the fascist ****** argue against free speech, while lacking the balls to say so.
If WE CONSIDER it "hateful or ugly," WE should be able to censor it - that is her position.
-1
Cannonpointer-1Today, 3:53 pm
-1
SIMPLE ?s for a simpleton racist pud.