Go create your own platform if you don't like Twitter's ToSIkeBana » 25 Apr 2022, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Freedom of speech, my ***. You **** don't have a clue about the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment. The only guarantee in the Constitution that freedom of speech will not be infringed upon by the government. Twitter is a private business, and whoever owns and manages Twitter can infringe on anybody's speech anytime they feel like it.
And the first time somebody goes on Twitter and tweets about how badly Musk treats his employees in those Tesla plants that whoever it is regardless of their politics, their ideology, or their connections, is gonna find themselves banned from Twitter. Free speech my ***.
Hey LOSER, freedom of SPEECH isn't a "dive into politics" but a PROTECTION OF THE VERY RIGHTS that made sure this nation remains FREE for you to say stupid crap and do it over and over and over!!!Monderegal » 25 Apr 2022, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Perhaps that wasn't the right connotation. I do think he might regret diving that deep into politics.
Elon says all accounts will be authenticated. How many of u pooty trolls will be willing to dox yourselves PUBLICLY?roadkill » 25 Apr 2022, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I tried to login on Twitter after being banned.
They said they're now reviewing my account.
This will probably take a while.
TWITTER and FACEBOOK are [[[[[[MASS MEDIA INFORMATION CONTROL]]]]]] devices that Goebbels and Hitler could have only dreamed of having at their disposal.IkeBana » 25 Apr 2022, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Freedom of speech, my ***. You **** don't have a clue about the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment. The only guarantee in the Constitution that freedom of speech will not be infringed upon by the government. Twitter is a private business, and whoever owns and manages Twitter can infringe on anybody's speech anytime they feel like it.
And the first time somebody goes on Twitter and tweets about how badly Musk treats his employees in those Tesla plants that whoever it is regardless of their politics, their ideology, or their connections, is gonna find themselves banned from Twitter. Free speech my ***.
Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2022, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey LOSER, freedom of SPEECH isn't a "dive into politics" but a PROTECTION OF THE VERY RIGHTS that made sure this nation remains FREE for you to say stupid crap and do it over and over and over!!!
Like you did TWICE on this thread!!!
One day you will plagiarize an argument from some neo-nazi and we will all know you dont even have the brainpower to author your own flaccid insults.Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You must have sucked the turds out of Bye--DONES arse with a BIG STRAW!!!
Did you have to think about this long before you wrote it or did your handlers provide you the C&P for posting everywhere???
Either way, you are a phucking IDIOT. Run along now before you get your head stomped in.
Twitter has become the "Town Square" and to censor ANYONE with an opposing point of view or OPINION is Fascist and I DO believe that Musk will NOT be censoring folks he disagrees with. TRUE FREEDOM comes with MORE free speech, and not less. It's getting your TARDO's to realize that simple FACT required for a free society to thrive.
If Trump becomes active on Twitter I will see all of his posts on GAB anyway.
HhhhmmmmmmmGHETTOBLASTER » 25 Apr 2022, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ If Trump becomes active on Twitter I will see all of his posts on GAB anyway.
Then just what the **** is his "main purpose?Xavier_Onassis » 25 Apr 2022, 5:41 pm » wrote: ↑ There is ZERO possibility that Musk will allow everyone and everything to post. If he did, the site would be a morass of porn, aborted fetus photos and conspiracy nonsense. You are wrong if you believe that his main purpose here is to allow Trump to return to spread his lies and brainless attacks.
Do you think Elon Musk didn't realize this would be the "Hidden Cost" of being a Patriot...?Monderegal » 25 Apr 2022, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ The question of Trump. Twitter isn't as influential as other platforms but I hear Tesla stock is crashing. Be careful what you wish for...
I have never spent a nanosecond on the **** that is Twitter. You **** think Musk is gonna be looking out for your "freedoms" whatever the **** your freedoms might be...you're dumb as a bag of hammers. But you also thought Trump was looking out for you. You **** don't know an oligarch when one of them has their little dickie right up your ***.Warcok » 25 Apr 2022, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Go create your own platform if you don't like Twitter's ToS
Musk is a muti-billionaire who has made no money to my knowledge outside of carbon credits and tax credits - nothing useful, nothing having to do with consumers but rather, having to do with tax payers and cozy wall street reationships.
GHETTOBLASTER » 25 Apr 2022, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you think Elon Musk didn't realize this would be the "Hidden Cost" of being a Patriot...?
Twitter wasn't political until democrats used it as a weapon against Trump.Monderegal » 25 Apr 2022, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Perhaps that wasn't the right connotation. I do think he might regret diving that deep into politics.
Do you sincerely believe that a billionaire who makes 100% of his income from the financial/government sector is anti financial/government sector?Neo » 25 Apr 2022, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Twitter wasn't political until democrats used it as a weapon against Trump.
I'm not saying that freedom of speech is not important. The truth though is that Twitter can notify it's content regulations. The alternative would be for the government to do it. That remains the danger IMHO. Elon Musk is going to be in that role.Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2022, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey LOSER, freedom of SPEECH isn't a "dive into politics" but a PROTECTION OF THE VERY RIGHTS that made sure this nation remains FREE for you to say stupid crap and do it over and over and over!!!
Like you did TWICE on this thread!!!
supraTruth » 25 Apr 2022, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Elon says all accounts will be authenticated. How many of u pooty trolls will be willing to dox yourselves PUBLICLY?
No, it isn't.Monderegal » 25 Apr 2022, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not saying that freedom of speech is not important. The truth though is that Twitter can notify it's content regulations. The alternative would be for the government to do it.
Cannonpointer » 25 Apr 2022, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it isn't.
Prohibiting censorship is neither censorship nor content control. It is merely making the game rules of PUBLIC corporations conform to PUBLIC policy.
It is against public policy for banks - even private ones - to discriminate based on race. Is that government control of a bank's lending scheme? Or is it creating public policy to which that bank and all of its competitors must adhere?
People have rights - but so do societies as such. When we take a man's property through eminent domain, a crime has been committed agaist him - for the public good. So it is legal. A legal crime. Because the public - as such, as the public - has interests which will sometimes override private interests.