Elon Musk owns Twitter!

User avatar
By Warcok
25 Apr 2022 2:13 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4 5 15
User avatar
Warcok
25 Apr 2022 7:04 pm
User avatar
     
2,393 posts
IkeBana » 25 Apr 2022, 6:40 pm » wrote: Freedom of speech, my ***.  You **** don't have a clue about the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment.  The only guarantee in the Constitution that freedom of speech will not be infringed upon by the government.  Twitter is a private business, and whoever owns and manages Twitter can infringe on anybody's speech anytime they feel like it.

And the first time somebody goes on Twitter and tweets about how badly Musk treats his employees in those Tesla plants that whoever it is regardless of their politics, their ideology, or their connections, is gonna find themselves banned from Twitter.  Free speech my ***.
Go create your own platform if you don't like Twitter's ToS 
User avatar
Beekeeper
25 Apr 2022 7:07 pm
User avatar
      
9,904 posts
Monderegal » 25 Apr 2022, 7:01 pm » wrote: Perhaps that wasn't the right connotation. I do think he might regret diving that deep into politics.
Hey LOSER, freedom of SPEECH isn't a "dive into politics" but a PROTECTION OF THE VERY RIGHTS that made sure this nation remains FREE for you to say stupid crap and do it over and over and over!!!

Like you did  TWICE on this thread!!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke

The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
User avatar
supraTruth
25 Apr 2022 7:08 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,152 posts
roadkill » 25 Apr 2022, 3:00 pm » wrote: I tried to login on Twitter after being banned.

They said they're now reviewing my account.

This will probably take a while.
Elon says all accounts will be authenticated.  How many of u pooty trolls will be willing to dox yourselves PUBLICLY? :faint:  
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
25 Apr 2022 7:20 pm
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
IkeBana » 25 Apr 2022, 6:40 pm » wrote: Freedom of speech, my ***.  You **** don't have a clue about the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment.  The only guarantee in the Constitution that freedom of speech will not be infringed upon by the government.  Twitter is a private business, and whoever owns and manages Twitter can infringe on anybody's speech anytime they feel like it.

And the first time somebody goes on Twitter and tweets about how badly Musk treats his employees in those Tesla plants that whoever it is regardless of their politics, their ideology, or their connections, is gonna find themselves banned from Twitter.  Free speech my ***.
TWITTER and FACEBOOK are [[[[[[MASS MEDIA INFORMATION CONTROL]]]]]] devices that Goebbels and Hitler could have only dreamed of having at their disposal.
The people at FACEBOOK should all be put to death who played any  part in the deliberate censorship of information that was proven to  saved the lives of countless Covid 19 Victims. 
 
User avatar
Monderegal
25 Apr 2022 7:34 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,231 posts
Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2022, 7:07 pm » wrote: Hey LOSER, freedom of SPEECH isn't a "dive into politics" but a PROTECTION OF THE VERY RIGHTS that made sure this nation remains FREE for you to say stupid crap and do it over and over and over!!!

Like you did  TWICE on this thread!!!

Elon Musk is going to hear a lot more of this. And it was just something I read somewhere. I don't track Tesla stock for a living.
Nothing is easier than defending the status quo.
User avatar
Ike Bana
25 Apr 2022 7:51 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: You must have sucked the turds out of Bye--DONES arse with a BIG STRAW!!!

Did you have to think about this long before you wrote it or did your handlers provide you the C&P for posting everywhere???

Either way, you are a phucking IDIOT. Run along now before you get your head stomped in.

Twitter has become the "Town Square" and to censor ANYONE with an opposing point of view or OPINION is Fascist and I DO believe that Musk will NOT be censoring folks he disagrees with. TRUE FREEDOM comes with MORE free speech, and not less. It's getting your TARDO's to realize that simple FACT required for a free society to thrive.
One day you will plagiarize an argument from some neo-nazi and we will all know you dont even have the brainpower to author your own flaccid insults.
 
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
25 Apr 2022 7:55 pm
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
BuckNaked » 25 Apr 2022, 6:54 pm » wrote: Who is gonna jump on Twitter now ?
If Trump becomes active on Twitter I will see all of his posts on GAB anyway.
 
Buck Naked
25 Apr 2022 8:10 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
18,661 posts
GHETTOBLASTER » 25 Apr 2022, 7:55 pm » wrote: If Trump becomes active on Twitter I will see all of his posts on GAB anyway.
Hhhhmmmmmmm
 
User avatar
Buffalo
25 Apr 2022 8:39 pm
User avatar
     
4,764 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 25 Apr 2022, 5:41 pm » wrote: There is ZERO possibility that Musk will allow everyone and everything to post. If he did, the site would be a morass of porn, aborted fetus photos and conspiracy nonsense. You are wrong if you believe that his main purpose here is to allow Trump to return to spread his lies and brainless attacks.
Then just what the **** is his "main purpose?
 
User avatar
*GHETTO BLASTER
25 Apr 2022 8:46 pm
User avatar
      
17,379 posts
Monderegal » 25 Apr 2022, 6:46 pm » wrote: The question of Trump. Twitter isn't as influential as other platforms but I hear Tesla stock is crashing. Be careful what you wish for...
Do you think Elon Musk didn't realize this would be the "Hidden Cost" of being a Patriot...?
 
User avatar
Ike Bana
25 Apr 2022 8:50 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
Warcok » 25 Apr 2022, 7:04 pm » wrote: Go create your own platform if you don't like Twitter's ToS
I have never spent a nanosecond on the **** that is Twitter.  You **** think Musk is gonna be looking out for your "freedoms" whatever the **** your freedoms might be...you're dumb as a bag of hammers.  But you also thought Trump was looking out for you.  You **** don't know an oligarch when one of them has their little dickie right up your ***.
 
 
User avatar
Neo
25 Apr 2022 8:56 pm
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
Liberals can create a new progressive chat service. Call it litter.

:rofl:  
User avatar
Cannonpointer
25 Apr 2022 9:04 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,653 posts
Warcok » 25 Apr 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: Freedom is back!!
Musk is a muti-billionaire who has made no money to my knowledge outside of carbon credits and tax credits - nothing useful, nothing having to do with consumers but rather, having to do with tax payers and cozy wall street reationships. 

A man allowed to do such things - I said it: allowed - is no friend of freedom. 

Look. Musk seems a wonderful fellow, based on PR and recent utterances. But he is one of the ruling class - the do nothing elite, - on a mission of diversion, giving the right false hope. Every minute wasted cheering for deus ex machina diversions is a minute NOT spent productively. 

Name a product or venture that Musk is associated with which has ever made a penny by providing consumers with value, and I might amend my argument. Don't say a word about Tesla, though - it's a money loser, if you take away the free money from tax subsidies and carbon credits. 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Monderegal
25 Apr 2022 9:09 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,231 posts
GHETTOBLASTER » 25 Apr 2022, 8:46 pm » wrote: Do you think Elon Musk didn't realize this would be the "Hidden Cost" of being a Patriot...?

Can't see the future. Just know politics is a beast.
Nothing is easier than defending the status quo.
User avatar
Neo
25 Apr 2022 9:16 pm
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
Monderegal » 25 Apr 2022, 7:01 pm » wrote: Perhaps that wasn't the right connotation. I do think he might regret diving that deep into politics.
Twitter wasn't political until democrats used it as a weapon against Trump. 
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
25 Apr 2022 9:20 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,653 posts
Neo » 25 Apr 2022, 9:16 pm » wrote: Twitter wasn't political until democrats used it as a weapon against Trump.
Do you sincerely believe that a billionaire who makes 100% of his income from the financial/government sector is anti financial/government sector?

I believe Musk is a trojan horse, diverting attention from useful actions with an ersatz deus ex machina mirage. 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Monderegal
25 Apr 2022 9:27 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,231 posts
Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2022, 7:07 pm » wrote: Hey LOSER, freedom of SPEECH isn't a "dive into politics" but a PROTECTION OF THE VERY RIGHTS that made sure this nation remains FREE for you to say stupid crap and do it over and over and over!!!

Like you did  TWICE on this thread!!!
I'm not saying that freedom of speech is not important. The truth though is that Twitter can notify it's content regulations. The alternative would be for the government to do it. That remains the danger IMHO. Elon Musk is going to be in that role.
Furthermore, there are legal restrictions on free speech that are codified into law. You can't say fire in a crowded theater is a refrain from the supreme court. My point is that will be a difficult position for anyone to be in. 
 
Nothing is easier than defending the status quo.
User avatar
roadkill
25 Apr 2022 9:49 pm
User avatar
      
21,743 posts
supraTruth » 25 Apr 2022, 7:08 pm » wrote: Elon says all accounts will be authenticated.  How many of u pooty trolls will be willing to dox yourselves PUBLICLY? Image

You sound like the troll.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
25 Apr 2022 10:24 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,653 posts
Monderegal » 25 Apr 2022, 9:27 pm » wrote: I'm not saying that freedom of speech is not important. The truth though is that Twitter can notify it's content regulations. The alternative would be for the government to do it.
No, it isn't.

Prohibiting censorship is neither censorship nor content control. It is merely making the game rules of PUBLIC corporations conform to PUBLIC policy. 

It is against public policy for banks - even private ones - to discriminate based on race. Is that government control of a bank's lending scheme? Or is it creating public policy to which that bank and all of its competitors must adhere?
 
People have rights - but so do societies as such. When we take a man's property through eminent domain, a crime has been committed agaist him - for the public good. So it is legal. A legal crime. Because the public - as such, as the public - has interests which will sometimes override private interests. 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
roadkill
25 Apr 2022 10:32 pm
User avatar
      
21,743 posts
Cannonpointer » 25 Apr 2022, 10:24 pm » wrote: No, it isn't.

Prohibiting censorship is neither censorship nor content control. It is merely making the game rules of PUBLIC corporations conform to PUBLIC policy. 

It is against public policy for banks - even private ones - to discriminate based on race. Is that government control of a bank's lending scheme? Or is it creating public policy to which that bank and all of its competitors must adhere?
 
People have rights - but so do societies as such. When we take a man's property through eminent domain, a crime has been committed agaist him - for the public good. So it is legal. A legal crime. Because the public - as such, as the public - has interests which will sometimes override private interests.

"Prohibiting censorship is neither censorship nor content control."

That means Musk has reinvested his wealth into the public interest.  Seems like a good service to me.
1 2 3 4 5 15

Who is online

In total there are 5389 users online :: 12 registered, 17 bots, and 5360 guests
Bots: NING, FDM, SiteLockSpider, okhttp, newspaper, YandexBot, Bolt, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, proximic, ADmantX, CriteoBot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Googlebot, Baiduspider
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search