My understanding is that he is taking it private. If so, that weakens any public claim to prevent censorship. The same public policy exists, but his case is a bit stronger as a private enterprise as opposed to a public one.roadkill » 25 Apr 2022, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑ "Prohibiting censorship is neither censorship nor content control."
That means Musk has reinvested his wealth into the public interest. Seems like a good service to me.
Surely you can appreciate the irony of the people complaining about Musk buying Twitter are the same people driving a Tesla.Cannonpointer » 25 Apr 2022, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑ My understanding is that he is taking it private. If so, that weakens any public claim to prevent censorship. The same public policy exists, but his case is a bit stronger as a private enterprise as opposed to a public one.
I didn't expect you would answer my question and you didn't fail to meet my very low expectations.
Cedar » 25 Apr 2022, 10:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Surely you can appreciate the irony of the people complaining about Musk buying Twitter are the same people driving a Tesla.
Cannonpointer » 25 Apr 2022, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Musk is a muti-billionaire who has made no money to my knowledge outside of carbon credits and tax credits - nothing useful, nothing having to do with consumers but rather, having to do with tax payers and cozy wall street reationships.
A man allowed to do such things - I said it: allowed - is no friend of freedom.
Look. Musk seems a wonderful fellow, based on PR and recent utterances. But he is one of the ruling class - the do nothing elite, - on a mission of diversion, giving the right false hope. Every minute wasted cheering for deus ex machina diversions is a minute NOT spent productively.
Name a product or venture that Musk is associated with which has ever made a penny by providing consumers with value, and I might amend my argument. Don't say a word about Tesla, though - it's a money loser, if you take away the free money from tax subsidies and carbon credits.
If I'm not mistaken GAB SOCIAL is run by Andrew Torba and not by committee.SJConspirator » 25 Apr 2022, 11:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The problem here is that Musk has taken total control of the “digital public square” ostensibly in defense of free speech - but at the same time removed a system of checks and balances that also protected free speech.
Twitter used to have shareholders, and as such it was a public entity regulated by the SEC. Twitter rules used to be an amalgam of the majority shareholders ideas, balanced by government watchdog agency. Now it’s just Musk.. in a stroke he has taken the system of checks and balances over the public discourse and replaced it with a dictator - himself
"My understanding is that he is taking it private."Cannonpointer » 25 Apr 2022, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑ My understanding is that he is taking it private. If so, that weakens any public claim to prevent censorship. The same public policy exists, but his case is a bit stronger as a private enterprise as opposed to a public one.
Cedar » 25 Apr 2022, 10:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Surely you can appreciate the irony of the people complaining about Musk buying Twitter are the same people driving a Tesla.
"Human Rights Watch, ACLU, Amnesty International Clutch Their Pearls in Horror At Elon Musk’s Purchase of Twitter"
"Here Are 10 Ways Elon Musk Vows to Change Twitter"
Z09 » 26 Apr 2022, 5:24 am » wrote: ↑ Trump pee tapes and an anonymous source says he called dead soldiers "loser".....Twitter: Yes, let's allow that
Hunter Biden laptop: Twitter: "Suspend that account"
Freedom never left, midwit.
I don't trust Elan Musk anymore than I ever did Trump since his introduction as a media darling back in the late 80's. I voted for trump twice 2016, 2020 and if he runs in 2024 a third time for one reason, lesser of evils option.
He's obviously not anti large government but he has a history of being pro speech. Even speech that might hurt a feeling or two. I don't see him as a savior for the first ammendment but perhaps he can reverse the direction Twitter has taken over the past 6 years.Cannonpointer » 25 Apr 2022, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you sincerely believe that a billionaire who makes 100% of his income from the financial/government sector is anti financial/government sector?
I believe Musk is a trojan horse, diverting attention from useful actions with an ersatz deus ex machina mirage.
Ypu think Musk is on your side.
He ain't on YOURS, negro TWINK!!!Pastafarian » 26 Apr 2022, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑ Ypu think Musk is on your side.
How absolutely dumb of you.