Liberal Forum

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 2:59 pm

Where have grown men showered with little girls? 

You made the claim, now show me. 

Though don’t show me pics of your own shower.

It's legal. You defend the law. What part of this are you struggling with? 

prediction
1. You will continue to use the stall tactic.
 

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 2:58 pm

No, not true either. 

As a thought crime, you might have a point. But last I checked, we haven’t criminalized thought crimes. 

You are dishonest as always.

It is now legal for men take showers with little girls. You defend that. Therefore, you defend pedophilia. 

You coming out directly admitting that is irrelevant. The fact that you defend that law says it all.

Cannonpointer » 28 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm

Which is why the texas law you balked at required social services to SPEAK WITH THEM, you **** slope-browed stooge.   

You are dishonest - a religious zealot on a crusade to protect PARENT VICTIMIZERS from scrutiny in cases that veritably REEK of movie-of-the-week fodder, you **** idiot.

So what? The government should not get involved. They have no evidence except what’s in the Bible. 

How many have FDIA as you claim. I mean, we’ve been into this law for a couple of months now. 

Now, if someone complains to child protective services over something they heard or saw them yes.

Does Texas Law allow this or are they going about it of their own whim.

And do they allow to sue those people that make false claims against a family? Or is it all anonymous?

These are the honest questions you should be asking. 

But your mind is already made up. 

I will repeat, never volunteer at a suicide hotline. 
 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2022, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:06 pm

It is now legal for men take showers with little girls. You defend that. Therefore, you defend pedophilia. 

You coming out directly admitting that is irrelevant. The fact that you defend that law says it all.

Then back up your claim. Show me. 

Show me, you lying ***.

 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2022, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:05 pm

It's legal. You defend the law. What part of this are you struggling with? 

prediction
1. You will continue to use the stall tactic.

It’s legal?

Show me. 

Where are grown men legally showering with women?

Maybe that’s true about your bathroom. 

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:09 pm

Then back up your claim. Show me. 

Show me, you lying ***.

Show you what? That you defend the law about adult men being allowed to shower with little girls? 

You would have denied it by now.

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:11 pm

It’s legal?

Show me. 

Where are grown men legally showering with women?

Maybe that’s true about your bathroom.

They are allowed in the locker rooms if they claim to identify as a woman you ignorant asshole. Come on man. Stop with this pretending ****. You know this.

And I never said they were showering with them, I said that it is legal. Now stop claiming that I said that. **** dishonesty. 

God damn lefties. I **** hate you liars. God man. Always dishonest tactic I have to look forward to. 
 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2022, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:15 pm

They are allowed in the locker rooms if they claim to identify as a woman you ignorant asshole. Come on man. Stop with this pretending ****. You know this.

And I never said they were showering with them, I said that it is legal. Now stop claiming that I said that. **** dishonesty. 

God damn lefties. I **** hate you liars. God man. Always dishonest tactic I have to look forward to.

Then show me. 

Grown men with little girls?

In schools? That would be creepy and wrong and everyone, even most trans people would say so. 

At the gym? Don’t know many little girls going to the gym. 

At the Y? 

You have evidence?
 

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm

So what? The government should not get involved. They have no evidence except what’s in the Bible.

And there goes your ****, self-betrayed.

In PREVIOUS posts - apparently, just to pretend at being "reasonable," you lied that the fault in my position was that I was ASSUMING the child was being victimized, when in fact, the child might or might not be.

So I pointed out your hypocrisy, as you object to the "conversation" that it was YOUR position ought to happen for my concerns to be validated. Once I point out the Texas law is a method of VALIDATING my concerns, your true agenda emerges. You want absolute protection from scrutiny by state mental health professionals - even AFTER you have admitted that such (suddenly abundant) cases could be in service to a parent's mental disorder.

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm

How many have FDIA as you claim. I mean, we’ve been into this law for a couple of months now.

DKDC - not relevant. A couple of months in a bureacratic system is less than five minutes in dog years. Nice attempt at deflection - asking me to do a google chase.

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm

Now, if someone complains to child protective services over something they heard or saw them yes.

SOMEONE? What do you think got this ball rolling? You don't think some worried grandparents who were told three year old BillyJohn is now Billie Jean might have made a few calls?

And when did you start believing that the sexual representations of toddlers should be treated as  legally meritorious?

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm

Does Texas Law allow this or are they going about it of their own whim.

And do they allow to sue those people that make false claims against a family? Or is it all anonymous?

These are the honest questions you should be asking.

Every state takes anonymous complaints. Child welfare is high on the list - at least in red states, still.

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm

But your mind is already made up.

Oh, I think we have all seen whose mind is already made up. You are against the state even looking into these cases - notwithstanding they have every earmark of Munchausen Mommy.
 

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:23 pm

Then show me. 

Grown men with little girls?

In schools? That would be creepy and wrong and everyone, even most trans people would say so. 

At the gym? Don’t know many little girls going to the gym. 

At the Y? 

You have evidence?

Where did I say it was happening? I said it is legal. Acknowledge what I claimed first. I am not going to continue with you lying about what I said. 

 

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 5:51 am

I never said you drink it but you do have an affinity to taste it. 

See, how can you find two dudes abnormal but two chicks not? Your taste and it has nothing to do with abnormality.

It's called to being gay...
 

Pastafarian » 26 Apr 2022, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2022, 3:05 pm

Oh look, a closeted pedo school board member in a red state, Indiana. 

Maybe he’s got Snow White syndrome?

Is that @Cannonpointer ? Could be? He’s certainly adamant it’s his first time. 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RpOuzfLP1gw

There is literally no information this guy is a Republican, which of course means he must be a Democrat, or it would be all over every story.
 

Pastafarian » 28 Apr 2022, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 3:23 pm

Then show me. 

Grown men with little girls?

In schools? That would be creepy and wrong and everyone, even most trans people would say so. 

At the gym? Don’t know many little girls going to the gym. 

At the Y? 

You have evidence?

Pedophilia is just the next sexual perversion to be "normalized" by liberals. 
They're already doing it, redefining the term to "minor attracted person" or MAP. 


 

golfboy » 28 Apr 2022, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 5:26 pm

Pedophilia is just the next sexual perversion to be "normalized" by liberals. 
They're already doing it, redefining the term to "minor attracted person" or MAP.

So you’ve got nothing except conjecture. 

Good luck with that ****. 
 

golfboy » 28 Apr 2022, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 5:25 pm

There is literally no information this guy is a Republican, which of course means he must be a Democrat, or it would be all over every story.

He’s a Republican. 

Dems don’t hide their pedo tendencies, remember. 

Vegas » 28 Apr 2022, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 4:07 pm

Where did I say it was happening? I said it is legal. Acknowledge what I claimed first. I am not going to continue with you lying about what I said.

It’s legal but not happening. 

Got you. 

**** retard. 
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Apr 2022, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022, 4:03 pm

And there goes your ****, self-betrayed.

In PREVIOUS posts - apparently, just to pretend at being "reasonable," you lied that the fault in my position was that I was ASSUMING the child was being victimized, when in fact, the child might or might not be.

So I pointed out your hypocrisy, as you object to the "conversation" that it was YOUR position ought to happen for my concerns to be validated. Once I point out the Texas law is a method of VALIDATING my concerns, your true agenda emerges. You want absolute protection from scrutiny by state mental health professionals - even AFTER you have admitted that such (suddenly abundant) cases could be in service to a parent's mental disorder.

DKDC - not relevant. A couple of months in a bureacratic system is less than five minutes in dog years. Nice attempt at deflection - asking me to do a google chase.

SOMEONE? What do you think got this ball rolling? You don't think some worried grandparents who were told three year old BillyJohn is now Billie Jean might have made a few calls?

And when did you start believing that the sexual representations of toddlers should be treated as  legally meritorious?

Every state takes anonymous complaints. Child welfare is high on the list - at least in red states, still.

Oh, I think we have all seen whose mind is already made up. You are against the state even looking into these cases - notwithstanding they have every earmark of Munchausen Mommy.

So how many trans kids’ parents have been charged in Texas?

So Texas is inefficient? And the children that are being traumatized still have to go through bureaucracy?

What a load of ****. Child protective services will take your child away very quickly if they are aware of abuse. 

You’re a dishonest shill. 

Pastafarian » 29 Apr 2022, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2022, 6:49 am

It’s legal but not happening. 

Got you. 

**** retard.

Irrelevant. Whether it has happened or not is irrelevant. It is legal and you defend it, therefore you defend pedophilia. Period. 

Got you. 

**** retard. 

Pastafarian » 26 Apr 2022, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2022, 3:05 pm

Oh look, a closeted pedo school board member in a red state, Indiana. 

Maybe he’s got Snow White syndrome?

Is that @Cannonpointer ? Could be? He’s certainly adamant it’s his first time. 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RpOuzfLP1gw

The OP is misleading.  There is no way to know, right now, whether the John Gray is a Dem, Republican or independent. All that is known about the man, (lots of information is being withheld) is the following:

• President of the Goshen Ohio School Board
• Resident of Goshen Ohio for 33 years
• has an associate degree in business management
• worked in manufacturing and facility maintenance, don't know for which company
• Presently is a facilities manager, don't know for which company
• Owns some real estate as an investment and an LLC
• Serving in his fifth year as president of the school board.

 
 

Pastafarian » 29 Apr 2022, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2022, 6:54 am

So how many trans kids’ parents have been charged in Texas?

Do you own googling, beevee.

Pastafarian » 29 Apr 2022, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2022, 6:54 am

So Texas is inefficient? And the children that are being traumatized still have to go through bureaucracy?

How are children "traumatized," you hysterical loon, by the state doing a welfare check? ANd if they ARE traumatized, should we stop investigating ANY hinky parental behavoor - not just the "my kid is a butterfly" variety, sompleton?

Pastafarian » 29 Apr 2022, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2022, 6:54 am

What a load of ****. Child protective services will take your child away very quickly if they are aware of abuse. 

Is THAT what scares you about munchausen mommies being ooked into, fruity?

You’re a dishonest shill.