Liberal Forum

Huey » 03 May 2022, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 2:28 pm

It is all one and the same.  But you already answered meaning you admit you lost the challenge as well as the argument that led to it.

All that is missing is the thread you have to create admitting you lost and I was right all along all without **** excuses.

Thanks!

No....they are not..

That is why one is "The Issue" and the other "The Challenge", Diverty.
 
 

Huey » 03 May 2022, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 2:32 pm

You don’t have to remind me.  Plus, you lost.  Now, go start that thread ball less wonder.

What thread?


 

Huey » 03 May 2022, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 2:31 pm

And that is why challenges from you are now ignored.  You are not man enough to own your loses.  

Got that beach pic yet?  Hell, your such a ****** you can’t admit you lost that challenged as well.  You had nothing to lose on that one.  Good thing dad is dead so he can’t be embarrassed,

And that is why challenges from you are now ignored.  

Dwarf,

You were already doing so, for reasons you asserted.

Because you are a lying little quimm.

Hell, your such a ****** you can’t admit you lost that challenged as well.

Not because you refuse to admit it.

Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 5:35 am » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 5:35 am

This is particularly true when the coward doing the calling refuses to answer questions.

 

Refuses to answers whom in particular? 

Yeah, we went over this about 600 times. You just love your redundancy. 


Coward.

IkeBana » 03 May 2022, 4:20 am » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 4:20 am

Call out threads are the home base of those who need to get an actual **** life.  Get a life...sniveling, whining, victim-role playing ****.

Let's compare how often I am here posting with respect to him. 

QED. 

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2022, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑

02 May 2022, 8:55 pm

I'm bite-curious. whazzup?

I think you already know. 

It's the one where we compare who has more OPs that include our own thoughts instead of strictly copying/pasting from the internet. Essentially, who has their own commentary with sources to back it vs who just copy/pastes with no intelligent commentary or thoughts of their own. 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 02 May 2022, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

02 May 2022, 9:45 pm

Why should I ... or anyone ... give a damn about your opinion of BV?

I never you said you should. 

Now **** off.

@Blackvegetable  you are out of excuses and lies. Did you ever give your test to Pigwen/Phelix? Yeah, I didn't think so. 

Do the challenge, now. 


1. Same repetitive excuses. 
100% accuracy. 

BV has never been able to answer any of my challenges with any degree of truth.
Once I got tired of playing WACK-A-MOLE with him and his compulsive lying....the only thing left for me to do was to stop feeding his totally pathetic 130 POSTS PER DAY TROLLING HABIT.
Instead of continuing to entertain and nourish this MENTALLY ILL POS LIAR with his own  "Tribute  Threads"...just put him on ignore.
Are you afraid you might accidentally create another "Las Vegas Shooter" if you do...?

 

GHETTOBLASTER » 03 May 2022, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 4:00 pm

Are you afraid you might accidentally create another "Las Vegas Shooter" if you do...?

He actually does get unstable when I ignore him. sometimes I put him in solitary confinement for violating rule 2 in my sig. I ignore him for a few days. During that time, he will tag/quote me about 50 times. He goes ape ****. So, I don't know. Maybe. He doesn't exactly have self-control. 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 02 May 2022, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑

02 May 2022, 9:48 pm

I was just pointing out the utter stupidity of accusing anyone of being a coward on the Internet.

  Xavier - Onassis                                                                                                              

Hey @Cannonpointer  ​​​​@Jinn Martini  . I would like to propose a logical postulate that should be rigidly sustained by the admin or mods.

If a member agrees to a challenge, but demands that the stipulations are for him to be allowed to cheat, then by the law of contradiction, that member must hold his agreement to partake in the challenge, but forfeit his privilege to demand any input on the conditions. 


If you would like, I will go into a mathematical explanation and the details to his acts of cheating. There are actually two. 


@Blackvegetable  

Vegas » 03 May 2022, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 6:08 pm

I would like to propose a logical postulate that should be rigidly sustained by the admin or mods.

If a member agrees to a challenge, but demands that the stipulations are for him to be allowed to cheat, then by the law of contradiction, that member must hold his agreement to partake in the challenge, but forfeit his privilege to demand any input on the conditions. 

If you would like, I will go into a mathematical explanation and the details to his acts of cheating. There are actually two. 

@Blackvegetable

You're trying to get Dr. Smith from the original television series "Lost in Space" to fight like a man. 

Were would you put anyone ELSE'S odds? 

Why would you believe yours are any better?
 

Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 2:33 pm

What thread?

No questions, dick sucker. 

Cannonpointer » 03 May 2022, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 6:11 pm

You're trying to get Dr. Smith from the original television series "Lost in Space" to fight like a man. 

Were would you put anyone ELSE'S odds? 

Why would you believe yours are any better?

Mine is better because it is based on mathematical axioms.

Vegas » 03 May 2022, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 6:08 pm

Hey @Cannonpointer  ​​​​@Jinn Martini  . I would like to propose a logical postulate that should be rigidly sustained by the admin or mods.

If a member agrees to a challenge, but demands that the stipulations are for him to be allowed to cheat, then by the law of contradiction, that member must hold his agreement to partake in the challenge, but forfeit his privilege to demand any input on the conditions. 

If you would like, I will go into a mathematical explanation and the details to his acts of cheating. There are actually two. 

@Blackvegetable

Don't beg.

Post the proof 
 

Cannonpointer » 03 May 2022, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 6:11 pm

You're trying to get Dr. Smith from the original television series "Lost in Space" to fight like a man. 

Were would you put anyone ELSE'S odds? 

Why would you believe yours are any better?

 

Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 6:13 pm

Post the proof

I don't take demands from you. Rule, idiot. 
\
The proof will be posted to Cannon/Jinn. You don't get ****. 

Cannonpointer » 03 May 2022, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 6:11 pm

You're trying to get Dr. Smith from the original television series "Lost in Space" to fight like a man. 

Were would you put anyone ELSE'S odds? 

Why would you believe yours are any better?

"OH THE PAIN...!!"
https://youtu.be/GXFaTyrX85o

Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑

03 May 2022, 6:15 pm

Oh for **** sakes. Is this a pic that you repeatedly throw at him also? God, how do you not know how predictable you are when you say/do the same **** over and over?