Cannonpointer » 03 May 2022, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You're trying to get Dr. Smith from the original television series "Lost in Space" to fight like a man.
Were would you put anyone ELSE'S odds?
Why would you believe yours are any better?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repetition_compulsionrepetition compulsion is a psychological phenomenon in which a person repeats an event or its circumstances over and over again. Repetition compulsion can also be used to cover the repetition of behaviour or life patterns more broadly: a "key component in Freud's understanding of mental life, 'repetition compulsion' ... describes the pattern whereby people endlessly repeat patterns of behaviour which were difficult or distressing in earlier life".
No questions, ******.
Reposting your last shameful panty dance isn't a defense corporal Klinger.
Proof of WHAT? That beevee is a weasel?Vegas » 03 May 2022, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Let me at least show you my mathematical proof before you make a decision.
My direct, and correct, answer to your question.Cannonpointer » 03 May 2022, 9:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Reposting your last shameful panty dance isn't a defense corporal Klinger.
Wait to see the "correct" answer, bishie...
I'm sorry, I didn't get your name...
Eminently forgettable.
Cannonpointer » 03 May 2022, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Proof of WHAT? That beevee is a weasel?
It's established. He's a panty dancing fop and a coward. So what?
You knew he was a worm when you put him in your pocket.
Blackvegetable » 04 May 2022, 4:51 am » wrote: ↑ My direct, and correct, answer to your question.
I admire how you proceed, full to the gunwales with ****...
I think this would be a good time for you to post an answer to your question.....
But, the music is playing....
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 04 May 2022, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑ Wait to see the "correct" answer, bishie...
Assuming @Cannonpointer has the peas.
Forced uder what conditions? I cannot squeeze blood from a turnip or manhood from the gender confused.Vegas » 04 May 2022, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ Proof that his agreement to my challenge under the condition of him being allowed to cheat should, by default, should force him to enter the challenge without say on his part. Just let me give you the logical and mathematical proof. It is built on two axioms: The law of contradiction and the law of identity.
Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Forced uder what conditions? I cannot squeeze blood from a turnip or manhood from the gender confused.
If I could force that weak ***, he would not be a weak ***.
You proved your case already to everyone except him.Vegas » 04 May 2022, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Forced that you simply mod the challenge without his consent. Do you remember the details of the challenge? Neither of us have to do anything. The evidence just needs to be examined by a mod whether he likes it or not. That's it. I have just as much to lose as him, I am also on the chopping block.
Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You proved your case already to everyone except him.
You will never prove it to him.
There is no chopping block.
Exactly. He is a craven piece of ****. This is known to all.Vegas » 04 May 2022, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't have to prove **** to him. He forfeited any explanation or rights to receive any input whatsoever the moment that he decided cheating should be a part of the conditions. Not my problem.
Cannonpointer » 04 May 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly. He is a craven piece of ****. This is known to all.