Huey » 03 May 2022, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ How about you acknowledge you lost your challenge. Then we can disucuss what you think the issue is. IN FULL. Not your edited version.
Huey » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
38 minutes ago
The issue is you issued a challenge and lost. That is all there is to it. And when you admit you lost the challenge it will prove I won the argument that led to it.
So post away, buddy. How
No...that's backwards.How about you acknowledge you lost your challenge. Then we can disucuss what you think the issue is.
Complained about what?Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ You are lying.
I have confirmed thatI'm good
- I have explained it to you
- You have complained about it
Did Jan 2020 come before or after Feb 2020?
Already covered
You're gonna have to remind yourself.
No...Huey » 03 May 2022, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ How about you acknowledge you lost your challenge. Then we can disucuss what you think the issue is. IN FULL. Not your edited version.
Huey » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
38 minutes ago
The issue is you issued a challenge and lost. That is all there is to it. And when you admit you lost the challenge it will prove I won the argument that led to it.
So post away, buddy. How
But never answered. You lose.
If you are not man enough to post this mysterious issue I can’t say whether or not I bitched about it.Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ You're gonna have to remind yourself.
No repeating.
Your rule.
^^^^^^Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ No...
No reframydiverty.
Just the plain language of your definition of The Issue.

Yes.
ReframyDiverty,Huey » 03 May 2022, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^^^^^
That is reframing and diverting. Did Jan 2020 come before or after Feb 2020?
Your challenge:
You lost,
Sheilagh,Huey » 03 May 2022, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ If you are not man enough to post this mysterious issue I can’t say whether or not I bitched about it.
Huey » 03 May 2022, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ How about you acknowledge you lost your challenge. Then we can disucuss what you think the issue is. IN FULL. Not your edited version.
Huey » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
38 minutes ago
The issue is you issued a challenge and lost. That is all there is to it. And when you admit you lost the challenge it will prove I won the argument that led to it.
So post away, buddy. How
are these your words?The issue was he was pumping a poster for info on her occupation, went to school, hammering her for what he thought may have been her weight, etc. WHat he does here. I told her don't give him any info because he will use it later to divert an debate. In a nutshell he denied he did that
So than you agree Jan 2020 came before Feb 2020. That means I was correct, you lost, and you owe me a thread where you admit as such with no **** excuses. Then we can get to what led to your failed challenge.
It is all one and the same. But you already answered meaning you admit you lost the challenge as well as the argument that led to it.Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ ReframyDiverty,
What came first, The Issue or The Challenge?
Obviously more then you. Hell, remember, your own dad realized you were not a man. That is why he gave you options. He knew you could not handle real life.Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Sheilagh,
What would you know of "Man enough"?
If you don't know why you're demanding, stop demanding.
Huey » 03 May 2022, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ So than you agree Jan 2020 came before Feb 2020. That means I was correct, you lost, and you owe me a thread where you admit as such with no **** excuses. Then we can get to what led to your failed challenge.
Covered.So than you agree Jan 2020 came before Feb 2020.
post any such rule.That means I was correct, you lost, and you owe me a thread where you admit as such with no **** excuses.
Post the rule of sequence.Then we can get to what led to your failed challenge.
You realize that your bitterness makes you even less lucid, right?Huey » 03 May 2022, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Obviously more then you. Hell, remember, your own dad realized you were not a man. That is why he gave you options. He knew you could not handle real life.
And that is why challenges from you are now ignored. You are not man enough to own your loses.Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Covered.
post any such rule.
Post the rule of sequence.
You don’t have to remind me. Plus, you lost. Now, go start that thread ball less wonder.Blackvegetable » 03 May 2022, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You realize that your bitterness makes you even less lucid, right?
You need to remind yourself of The Issue.