you confuse loyalty with honesty or should I say honestly believing nobody knows how biology works evolving in series parallel compounding DNA results present.Annoyed Liberall » 18 May 2022, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Thank you.
While I disagree with your definition of liberals, I respect your honesty.
I think we need to take all talk of gender and sexuality out of schools.
It has no place there.
I think all teachers need to be held accountable for trying to mold children's minds either right or left.
That's a parents job.
I also think we should teach real history.
But, I know conservatives don't want the real history of this country taught.
That's perhaps another thread entirely.
Fair enough. I do, however, note that you do not refute the way I defined the two terms. But, that's possibly because you realize that would not further the discussion.AnnoyedLiberall » 18 May 2022, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Thank you.
While I disagree with your definition of liberals, I respect your honesty.
I agree to some extent. I think certain activities, like high school dances, proms, homecoming, may still have a place. Also, I think it would be impossible to scrub gender out of books. Also, dress codes tend to fall along gender lines. Making everything completely gender neutral would be a big mistake, but I do not believe that is what you are suggesting. I'm just pointing out that on some level this needs to be addressed rationally.I think we need to take all talk of gender and sexuality out of schools.
I completely agree. Personal politics have no place in schools at all.I think all teachers need to be held accountable for trying to mold children's minds either right or left.
That's a parents job.
Real History, now there's a baited phrase if there ever was one. In England, some schools still require that their students memorize the English Monarchs. So, what do you define as "Real History"? Also, how many semesters do you want dedicated to teaching history? Some folks pursue post-graduate degrees in history focusing on just American Slavery, or the Algonquin Indians, military tactics of Jefferson Davis, or the reign of King Henry VIII. Limited time.....limited young minds.....trying to keep things neutral, yet cover 1600's to 2022. That's a tall order, Chief.I also think we should teach real history.
Real history.Skans » 18 May 2022, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ Real History, now there's a baited phrase if there ever was one. In England, some schools still require that their students memorize the English Monarchs. So, what do you define as "Real History"? Also, how many semesters do you want dedicated to teaching history? Some folks pursue post-graduate degrees in history focusing on just American Slavery, or the Algonquin Indians, military tactics of Jefferson Davis, or the reign of King Henry VIII. Limited time.....limited young minds.....trying to keep things neutral, yet cover 1600's to 2022. That's a tall order, Chief.
Leave nothing dreaming “Never door;omh » 18 May 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ you confuse loyalty with honesty or should I say honestly believing nobody knows how biology works evolving in series parallel compounding DNA results present.
Skans » 18 May 2022, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑ Actually, you can have utility, i.e. personal satisfaction, if you die to save your son's life. In this case, it would be a simple set of supply and demand curves where the equilibrium is the price of your life for your son's. Or, if you believe your life is more valuable than your son's I believe this could also be graphed with a vertical supply curve and a vertical demand curve. But, that's probably not accurate either, more likely it would simply be two independent points in the ++ quadrant of the graph.
...don't sell yourself short....you are world champion-level at 'dopeish,' trumptard...
Skans » 18 May 2022, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ Fair enough. I do, however, note that you do not refute the way I defined the two terms. But, that's possibly because you realize that would not further the discussion.
I agree to some extent. I think certain activities, like high school dances, proms, homecoming, may still have a place. Also, I think it would be impossible to scrub gender out of books. Also, dress codes tend to fall along gender lines. Making everything completely gender neutral would be a big mistake, but I do not believe that is what you are suggesting. I'm just pointing out that on some level this needs to be addressed rationally.
I completely agree. Personal politics have no place in schools at all.
Real History, now there's a baited phrase if there ever was one. In England, some schools still require that their students memorize the English Monarchs. So, what do you define as "Real History"? Also, how many semesters do you want dedicated to teaching history? Some folks pursue post-graduate degrees in history focusing on just American Slavery, or the Algonquin Indians, military tactics of Jefferson Davis, or the reign of King Henry VIII. Limited time.....limited young minds.....trying to keep things neutral, yet cover 1600's to 2022. That's a tall order, Chief.
Yeah, I must admit this is a far better idea.Skans » 18 May 2022, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ .....or alternatively selling their body parts to the Chinese?
That is true for the whole western hemisphere !Vegas » 17 May 2022, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ The teachers will never get paid enough for the **** they deal with.
They get treated like crap by...well, everyone.
The admin, the parents, the students...the social media warriors.
You couldn't pay me enough to endure that crap.
I also think this is the only possible / viable solution .Warcok » 17 May 2022, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ 2. By force - i.e. violent revolution
Leftist progs need to be gun down like those chimps In buffalo. Shoot'em where you find'em✌
Skans » 17 May 2022, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry, you don't make the cut little buddy. You won't be teaching anyone anything.
You forgot to add . . . "from cradle to grave" !omh » 17 May 2022, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ you made up the grade that doesn't come with evolving in plain sight.
Why, if I may ask ?DeplorablePatriot » 17 May 2022, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't comment on the way I'd like to combat it.
That too . . . but first and foremost they sexually abuse them !Xavier_Onassis » 17 May 2022, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Liberals are teachers . . . because . . . they empathize with children.
for each individual ancestor living in series parallel time evolving in plain sight of themselves surrounded by everything doing the same thing, evolving now as specifically here behaving exactly as the future arrives.
ha ha ha -smart arss.
What did I just write? There's your answer. I know what you're searching for though.
wow, you leaped into time is stationary mode. you haven't said anything in a rotation of the planet and your first part says just write? Where is your intellectual time relativity?
GHETTOBLASTER » 17 May 2022, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Once SHTF DAY arrives..imagine how much fun we're gonna have...!!