Liberal Forum

omh » 18 May 2022, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 12:45 pm

wow, you leaped into time is stationary mode. you haven't said anything in a rotation of the planet and your first part says just write? Where is your intellectual time relativity?

What's with your odd compulsion of turning simple into complex? You are not energy efficient. Bad boy!   

DeplorablePatriot » 18 May 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 12:58 pm

What's with your odd compulsion of turning simple into complex? You are not energy efficient. Bad boy!  :drool:  

what is simple compounding interest? the exponential whole. You define existential parts related to evolving as part of the whole reached currently against itself in the whole reached now.

Where is the complication with kinetic mutually evolving in an adapt or become extinct environment for each reproduction here?

omh » 18 May 2022, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:05 pm

what is simple compounding interest? the exponential whole. You define existential parts related to evolving as part of the whole reached currently against itself in the whole reached now.

Where is the complication with kinetic mutually evolving in an adapt or become extinct environment for each reproduction here?

Do you take lithium? I'm being serious.

DeplorablePatriot » 18 May 2022, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:09 pm

Do you take lithium? I'm being serious.

never needed it. My brain works faster than rational minds translate real into fragmented realities governed by malcontents historically in charge to date.

see you won't accept life beyond your social identity limited to context over content evolving in plain sight.

Skans » 17 May 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2022, 9:18 am

What's the best way to combat leftism?
1.  Retake our education system, purge it of all liberals and leftists and fill the rolls with real educators, conservatives and strict constructionists?
2.  By force - i.e. violent revolution?
3.  By exclusivity movements - clubs, organizations, societies, churches, etc. which have strict sets of rules prohibiting globalists, liberals and leftists?
4.  By capturing and manipulating technology against the proliferation of leftism?

Other thoughts are welcome.

What do you man by Leftism? You just toss everyone into your garbage bag, and do not distinguish anything!
You are an extremist RWNJ tainted by QAnon BS and LIES!  
 

nuckin futz » 18 May 2022, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:14 pm

What do you man by Leftism? You just toss everyone into your garbage bag, and do not distinguish anything!
You are an extremist RWNJ tainted by QAnon BS and LIES! :loco:  
 

survivors are what is leftism living in a mutually evolving here now environment with a catch all "adapt or become extinct.".

omh » 18 May 2022, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:13 pm

never needed it. My brain works faster than rational minds translate real into fragmented realities governed by malcontents historically in charge to date.

see you won't accept life beyond your social identity limited to context over content evolving in plain sight.

Whom was the last malcontent historically in charge to date?

DeplorablePatriot » 18 May 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:21 pm

Whom was the last malcontent historically in charge to date?

Look at you trying to isolate the whole by establishing another hole of doubt every chain of command is involved with denying how living works naturally here.

whom, not who? See you prove you are instinctively aware you deny life in kinetic displacement.

nuckinfutz » 18 May 2022, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:14 pm

What do you man by Leftism? You just toss everyone into your garbage bag, and do not distinguish anything!
You are an extremist RWNJ tainted by QAnon BS and LIES!

Leftists=Spoiled, malcontented, unworldly, whiney, demanding, naive, under-achieving, self-hating, self-entitled, militant "children".

There you have it, Buttram.    

Skans » 18 May 2022, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 8:03 am

Ok, you really just supported what I was saying.  College education + real world experience is, in my opinion, the makings of better teachers than those who go to college simply to learn to teach children, with no real world experience doing anything like what you have referenced.

Unfortunately most business men don't want the hassels for what people want to pay for teachers.  Most K-12 teachers are moms, & actually moms get the most discipline from students, even the bratty boys who think they are men already.  MOM POWER!

omh » 18 May 2022, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:25 pm

Look at you trying to isolate the whole by establishing another hole of doubt every chain of command is involved with denying how living works naturally here.

whom, not who? See you prove you are instinctively aware you deny life in kinetic displacement.

Who then? Answer the question.

DeplorablePatriot » 18 May 2022, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:31 pm

Who then? Answer the question.

I did, every chain of command changing ancestors into contextual typecast people not ancestors divided between 5 generations present as eternally separated adapting to the moment here.

Kinetic results evolving without potential doubt specifically displaced performing as directed to serve idealists historically into current events of next generations repeating the process over and over expecting better tomorrow each rotation of the planet..

Power of suggestion has been corrupted since context became the means o0f communicating brain to brain existing as part of an ever changing population here.

See it wasn't a WHO, it was HOW. left is why, what, where, when, which, whom resisted sedition and seduction of promised better tomorrows than evolving as one of a kind now.

I am the first one male human to resist deniers globally.

impartialobserver » 18 May 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 10:46 am

Prior to the bit about one's son, your example fits. Paying any price no matter how high in order to keep obtaining positive utility. No diminishing returns either because the good, air, is necessity and therefore you are never counterbalancing desire and resources. 

You would have to have two separate demand curves in your situation. The math does not work out for two situations that are opposed to each other. 
 

No, the math has to work out, we just aren't modeling it correctly.  And, I don't believe it requires two separate demand curves. The product demanded is air.  The cost of that air is one life. Substitute one dollar for one life, and I think it works out.  Or, if the life is worth an infinite amount, then substitute an infinite amount as the price.  But, again, this is more of a philosophical question, isn't it.  Models can be made to closely approximate real life.  Heck, that's all you are doing with economics models anyway, supply and demand curves being some of the simplest. 

back to the topic, when class would start i would ask the simplest of questions such as what other options do you have besides sitting in this classroom? This illustrates opportunity cost. The glazed over looks were astounding to me.

Community college?  I would believe that. Answering questions and thinking was not clearly stated in the course description. Next time, bring a big bag of smarties in and hand one out to anyone who even utters a groan, snort or snore to show they are alive after you ask a question.  The monkeys will soon understand that they get something in exchange for vocal responses to your inquiries.  Sure, you might get written up for handing out toxic waste to retarded adults, but think of the opportunity cost you would be shedding from being relieved of the futile attempts at interacting with brain-dead community college flunkies!

Now, if these are post-graduate students, I would have a hard time believing some "flamer" who planted himself front and center didn't have his hand shooting up like a Bic Lighter flame every time you asked even a rhetorical question.

peepee » 18 May 2022, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 10:57 am

   
...get to the point, dumb@ss!.... you won't be happy until your particular [stooooooooopid f@ck] iteration of 'conservative republicanism' controls government schooling... little do you know but you're just another authoritardian monetary ignoramus and dimwit with an    opinion...word...

Oh, now you are accusing me of wanting to chop the heads off of homosexuals and tomahawk anyone with 1/8th Injun blood in them.  How lame.
 

JinnMartini » 18 May 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 11:12 am

Yeah, I must admit this is a far better idea.

But we should sell them only the spare parts we ourselves have a surplus of !

For many body spare parts we have a shortage too, ya know !

Oh, of course.  Like Herpes-lips and AIDS rectums - marked "FOR CHINESE CONSUMPTION ONLY"
 

nuckinfutz » 18 May 2022, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:14 pm

What do you man by Leftism? You just toss everyone into your garbage bag, and do not distinguish anything!
You are an extremist RWNJ tainted by QAnon BS and LIES!

QAnon - now, there's an invention of Leftists.  Never heard of QAnon before one of you leftists mentioned it.

So, whenever I read "QAnon" - that is a good criteria for identifying the writer as a Leftist.
 

supraTruth » 18 May 2022, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:29 pm

Unfortunately most business men don't want the hassels for what people want to pay for teachers. 
 

Lots of retired businessmen would teach if barriers to becoming a teacher were reasonable.  Background checks to make sure the person isn't a Pedo or Convicted Felon - no one would object to that.  Heck, if I ever retire, I'd even consider it.

 moms get the most discipline from students, even the bratty boys who think they are men already.  MOM POWER!

Not true.  Male teachers who know how to speak and command respect from others have the least troubles with discipline. A good teacher doesn't need to discipline students, because he/she is interesting enough to actually have the class' attention.  I've seen this in action a number of times, and generally these teachers are men.

However, you can't have some stuttering, stammering, squish blither-blathering on about who-knows-what and think ANYONE is going to listen to the idiot.
 

Skans » 17 May 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2022, 9:18 am

What's the best way to combat leftism?
1.  Retake our education system, purge it of all liberals and leftists and fill the rolls with real educators, conservatives and strict constructionists?
2.  By force - i.e. violent revolution?
3.  By exclusivity movements - clubs, organizations, societies, churches, etc. which have strict sets of rules prohibiting globalists, liberals and leftists?
4.  By capturing and manipulating technology against the proliferation of leftism?

Other thoughts are welcome.

1. Don't subscribe to and re-vomit thier narratives.

2. When you see the rino establishment at fixed noise in bed with dems, don't use that as a pretext to back dem policy.

I am intrested to understand how you can toss out the idea of "prohibiting globalists," when you side with the globalists on Ukraine. 
 

Cannonpointer » 18 May 2022, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:58 pm

I am intrested to understand how you can toss out the idea of "prohibiting globalists," when you side with the globalists on Ukraine.
 

Because, I evaluate each issue and/or position I take on something thoroughly and independently.  I am not going to automatically take the opposite side on something just because my usual opposition takes a position on it as well.

You, on the other hand, stake out a position against a group you claim to dislike, and then simply take the opposite position on everything they support or challenge. 

Skans » 18 May 2022, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

18 May 2022, 1:39 pm

No, the math has to work out, we just aren't modeling it correctly.  And, I don't believe it requires two separate demand curves. The product demanded is air.  The cost of that air is one life. Substitute one dollar for one life, and I think it works out.  Or, if the life is worth an infinite amount, then substitute an infinite amount as the price.  But, again, this is more of a philosophical question, isn't it.  Models can be made to closely approximate real life.  Heck, that's all you are doing with economics models anyway, supply and demand curves being some of the simplest. 

Community college?  I would believe that. Answering questions and thinking was not clearly stated in the course description. Next time, bring a big bag of smarties in and hand one out to anyone who even utters a groan, snort or snore to show they are alive after you ask a question.  The monkeys will soon understand that they get something in exchange for vocal responses to your inquiries.  Sure, you might get written up for handing out toxic waste to retarded adults, but think of the opportunity cost you would be shedding from being relieved of the futile attempts at interacting with brain-dead community college flunkies!

Now, if these are post-graduate students, I would have a hard time believing some "flamer" who planted himself front and center didn't have his hand shooting up like a Bic Lighter flame every time you asked even a rhetorical question.

We have some new folks to the office that have recently earned the masters in economics prior to coming here. Sadly but predictably, their explanations of economic ideas is straight from the textbook. When asked to give real life examples.. the silence is deafening. This is particularly interesting because they are paid to produce and write economic analysis.