Oh, you mean omh's thread.... but omh referred to a peanut thread from which YOU banned me too even while I didn't say anything in there... that's not impartial so I don't feel guilty about calling you a troll in THAT one... lol... see how that works?B.See » 20 Aug 2022, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, btw. I just saw the latest whining thread created by someone who repeatedly and consistently trolled my non PG threads with complete ant utter nonsense.
Nice to know that after I treated YOU impartially in this thread, YOU repeatedly referred to me as the "B. See troll" in THAT one.
You're correct. It's not impartial.Jantje_Smit » 21 Aug 2022, 12:21 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, you mean omh's thread.... but omh referred to a peanut thread from which YOU banned me too even while I didn't say anything in there... that's not impartial so I don't feel guilty about calling you a troll in THAT one... lol... see how that works?
This is getting confusing, you didn't behave like an annoying spamming troll in this thread so I decided to be nice in return... that's how it is supposed to work... but now you want to ban me anyway because I called you a troll in another thread... which is about you banning people.. including me... so people can't call you a troll.. while you behave like one.... you admit that's not impartial, yet you claim to be impartial in this thread because you didn't ban me... damn... I need more coffee, see if that helps...B.See » 21 Aug 2022, 12:33 am » wrote: ↑ You're correct. It's not impartial.
Actually I showed you MORE partiality that perhaps I should've. Because as I've previously stated, some posters are pre-banned because of the consistency, frequency, and nature of their past responses to me - i.e. like continuous name calling, hate speech, fraudulent direct quotes, repeated nonsense content, and drive by **** postings, the last of which YOU'VE repeatedly engaged in.
So yes, I had every reason to pre-ban you TOO. And seeing as how you're still running around in another thread calling me the B.See troll, I think I'd be well justified in banning you from this one as well. Because SOME people APPARENTLY don't appreciate "nice."
See how THAT works?
So, your argument is that, unlike others I regularly pre-ban for similar offenses, YOU should be allowed to post in this thread and any future PG thread I might create,Jantje_Smit » 21 Aug 2022, 2:06 am » wrote: ↑ This is getting confusing, you didn't behave like an annoying spamming troll in this thread so I decided to be nice in return... that's how it is supposed to work... but now you want to ban me anyway because I called you a troll in another thread... which is about you banning people.. including me... so people can't call you a troll.. while you behave like one.... you admit that's not impartial, yet you claim to be impartial in this thread because you didn't ban me... damn... I need more coffee, see if that helps...
Eh, no... that was your argument...B.See » 21 Aug 2022, 3:47 am » wrote: ↑ So, your argument is that, unlike others I regularly pre-ban for similar offenses, YOU should be allowed to post in this thread and any future PG thread I might create,
in SPITE of the fact that you continue to troll and name-call me in threads that I don't even PARTICIPATE in.
Surely you can see why I'm confused now....B.See » 20 Aug 2022, 4:01 am » wrote: ↑ No, I didn't forget to ban you...
Seeing as how your above response was ON TOPIC, you can stay. We'll see whether you'll return that courtesy by resorting to your usual **** posting.
EXACTLY. I said,Jantje_Smit » 21 Aug 2022, 4:21 am » wrote: ↑ Eh, no... that was your argument...
Surely you can see why I'm confused now....
So that's it. I'm done. And so are you.Jantje_Smit » 21 Aug 2022, 3:53 am » wrote: ↑ Funny thing, I just had this same kind of argument with the @B.See troll... he doesn't do nuance either... at least you are consistent in your lack of nuance.. lol... you can say you included every nuance people use to defy life in plain sight but according to you all nuances the same... so how can there be any nuances for you to include?
We'll see, Neil. Because from what I'm reading sounds like Liz has plans. Including some speculation that she'll make a run for the presidency. (not that she'd have chance of winning the nomination with TRUMP'S MAGA hoards).
Kamala left the Presidential race before most of the PrimariesB.See » 21 Aug 2022, 5:27 am » wrote: ↑ We'll see, Neil. Because from what I'm reading sounds like Liz has plans. Including some speculation that she'll make a run for the presidency. (not that she'd have chance of winning the nomination with TRUMP'S MAGA hoards).
But consider this if you will. If Republicans nominate either Trump or DeSantis, either will be a BIG impetus for every America loving PATRIOT who DOESN'T want the death of democracy and a FASCIST supremacist in the O. Office, to walk run or even CRAWL to vote.... JUST like we did in 2020.
But with a Liz Cheney nominee... well... we just MIGHT not be as equally driven.
At least with her, we'd NOT have to worry about her siding with Putin over American intelligence, calling our military generals idiots, trying to dismantle NATO while handing eastern Europe over to Putin on a fkng SILVER PLATTER, and calling neo-Nazis "very fine people while undermining government, installing ***-kissing loyalists, and GRIFTING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
Trump put HIMSELF first.NEILCAR » 21 Aug 2022, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑ Kamala left the Presidential race before most of the Primaries
... I predict liz will not last that long.
Trump put America and Americans 1st.
Hilary paid Russians for the Steal dossier; Hilary colluded with the Russians ...
Our Generals haven't won a war since WWII, & did you see the Afghanistan pull out ... so yea they are idiots.
Russia would not and did not invade Ukraine while Trump was President.
It appears the biden crime family in on the payroll of Ukraine, China, and Russia ...
biden just pump more $$$ into an already inflationary economy which will increase inflation.
lolB.See » 21 Aug 2022, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ Trump put HIMSELF first.
Trump colluded with the Russians
The Afghanistan pull out was brokered by Trump, who wanted to invite the Taliban to Camp David on the anniversary of 9/11 no less.
Russia wouldn't have had to invade Ukraine. Trump's plan was to hand it over to Putin and pull OUT of NATO
The TRUMP crime family is on the dole of the AMERICAN TAXPAYER
Biden's initiatives are for the BENEFIT of Americans.
Well Neil, starting with those stimulus checks you've no doubt already banked and spentNEILCAR » 21 Aug 2022, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ lol
Well, let me know when these "BENEFIT" start kicking in. I'm not sure any American have noticed it yet ... lol
Infrastructure ... Nothing new has been built around me, no new bridges, tunnels, pipelines, water towers ... what infrastructure???B.See » 21 Aug 2022, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ Well Neil, starting with those stimulus checks you've no doubt already banked and spent
But he's managed to pull off a FEW other things as well, in spite of GOP obstruction. Here's a list of just five. And to make it EXTRA SPECIAL, THIS one is from FOX NEWS:
5 good things Biden has done for all of us | Fox News
Again, as the article suggests, some of those things you mentioned were beyond to control of Biden. And according to some economists, Trump started the ball rolling on inflation. Trump contributed hugely to inflation: the public should know thisNEILCAR » 21 Aug 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ Infrastructure ... Nothing new has been built around me, no new bridges, tunnels, pipelines, water towers ... what infrastructure???
Economic Gains ... you have to be kidding me ... Inflation, gas prices, supply chain problems, hell biden cause the baby formula shortage (you are making it to easy for me)
NATO ... Trump forced all Nations to pay their fair share and I am not sure biden brought the NATO Nations together, some would suggest Russian invading Ukraine did that.
Lowering the Child poverty rate ... sounds like a good thing didn't benefit me in any way.
Diversity ... did some good there but now men are competing against women, and we now have a Supreme Court Justice who cannot define what a woman is (and she is presumably a woman) ... lol
I am sure there perhaps is some value ...B.See » 21 Aug 2022, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ Again, as the article suggests, some of those things you mentioned were beyond to control of Biden. And according to some economists, Trump started the ball rolling on inflation. Trump contributed hugely to inflation: the public should know this
As for those things that didn't directly benefit you, are you suggesting they are of no value because of that?
The US is producing MORE oil today than it was when Trump crowed about "Energy Independence".NEILCAR » 21 Aug 2022, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ I am sure there perhaps is some value ...
... no benefit for me ... the cost of goods and services is going up, my money is losing value, just about everything biden and the dems have touched they have ruined.
4 years ago the US was the world's leading producer of Oil.
Today Energy and Oil programs are a failure, foreign and domestic policies have all failed, economy is a failure. Supply chain problems remain.
The real successful days for biden is the days he doesn't fall off his bike.
Xavier_Onassis » 21 Aug 2022, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ The US is producing MORE oil today than it was when Trump crowed about "Energy Independence".
You do not know ****.
Trump is a liar a thief and a conman, he belongs in prison.
B.See » 26 May 2022, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Liz Cheney Says Republican Leaders Have Enabled White Supremacy
Republican Congresswoman Liz Cheney has accused the GOP of enabling white nationalism and white supremacy in the wake of the mass shooting in Buffalo, New York, which has left 10 people dead and three injured.
"The House GOP leadership has enabled white nationalism, white supremacy, and anti-semitism," Cheney wrote on Twitter on Monday.
"History has taught us that what begins with words ends in far worse.
MEANWHILE:
Conservative: Vote for Democrats — or ‘the orange emperor can waltz back and finish destroying U.S. democracy’ - Raw Story
Voters face a choice this year, according to a conservative columnist: Vote Republican or choose democracy.
"A majority of House Republicans already voted in 2020 to throw out electoral college votes for Biden," wrote Boot, a former Republican. "Even more are likely to do so in 2024 after four years of Trumpist purges. With the support of the Jan. 6 Republicans, the orange emperor can waltz back into the White House and finish destroying U.S. democracy."
The Democrat Plan explained...courtesy of THIS Free American!B.See » 26 May 2022, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑ cart before horse logic. Her career is in jeopardy because from the get SHE RIGHTFULLY CALLED OUT THE MAGA HATE CULT FOR WHO AND WHAT THEY ARE.
And she isn't the ONLY Republican calling them OUT:
The Republican Plan explained, courtesy of The Lincoln Project
B.See » 26 May 2022, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑ cart before horse logic. Her career is in jeopardy because from the get SHE RIGHTFULLY CALLED OUT THE MAGA HATE CULT FOR WHO AND WHAT THEY ARE.
And she isn't the ONLY Republican calling them OUT:
The Republican Plan explained, courtesy of The Lincoln Project