..or send him to an INDOCTRINATION CAMP.
He would just be quietly removed. You sound like a guy who entered the military in the 90s.GHETTOBLASTER » 26 May 2022, 11:57 pm » wrote: ↑ ..or send him to an INDOCTRINATION CAMP.
What's worse is a PFC in the year 2020 who heard his Captain speak those "mean words" might think he is entitled to report his Captain to a higher authority...?
Who would you trust actually walking into Indian country with?Jantje_Smit » 27 May 2022, 12:04 am » wrote: ↑ Hmm... I don't do ideologies but I would say Cedar, Deezer and Cannon of course.... when it comes to the insulting ideology....
No questions, ***...
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ha ha haFOS » 27 May 2022, 12:08 am » wrote: ↑ Who would you trust actually walking into Indian country with?
FOS » 27 May 2022, 12:01 am » wrote: ↑ He would just be quietly removed. You sound like a guy who entered the military in the 90s.
My grandfather worked for the pentagon into his 90s.
And he lived a long damn time.
I can remember before he gave me a few million $ Inherirance he grabbed me and said "I will see you in valhalla".
Think about that.
That's a tough one, injuns can't be trusted but @Herman Two Feather would be ok....FOS » 27 May 2022, 12:08 am » wrote: ↑ Who would you trust actually walking into Indian country with?
You were drafted before I was born hahGHETTOBLASTER » 27 May 2022, 12:15 am » wrote: ↑ I was drafted in 1972 but the war was thankfully called off after I got out of advanced training.
That's a very cool story about Grand Pa..!
A guy I served with has a son who is a full colonel who works at the Pentagon. That how old I am....
My answer to the op is nobody defending ideology over biological self evident results. Everyone is accepting being misled or misleading next generation arrivals cradle to grave.sooted up Cyndi » 27 May 2022, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ Nobody else has anything to say on this topic. I thought it was interesting.
yes Dear. I fully expected and answer like that.omh » 27 May 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ My answer to the op is nobody defending ideology over biological self evident results. Everyone is accepting being misled or misleading next generation arrivals cradle to grave.
honesty always disappoints corrupted souls loathing the one that got away.sooted up Cyndi » 27 May 2022, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ yes Dear. I fully expected and answer like that. :wave:
Ok 95% then so you can always have that 5% margin of error reasonable doubt to escape any reality proven wrong and it wasn't your fault being 95% aligned by choice.Annoyed Liberall » 27 May 2022, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ I don't think there is anyone I am 100% aligned with.
Unlike @Skans and @Taipan it's worth giving @Neo the benefit of the doubt.
The thread is NOT about a 100% alignment.AnnoyedLiberall » 27 May 2022, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ I don't think there is anyone I am 100% aligned with.
I'm glad you bumped this thread.JinnMartini » 29 May 2022, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑ The thread is NOT about a 100% alignment.
It's about who you're CLOSEST to ?
90% ?
80% ?
70% ?
60 ?
50 ?
40?
That must be good for 20% alignment with @Blackvegetable , @Xavier_Onassis , @Benson13 etc. etc, etc. ?sootedupCyndi » 29 May 2022, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑ I'm glad you bumped this thread.![]()
Al is like an old time liberal.
not one of those new nutty types..
ex. S-bee
sootedupCyndi » 27 May 2022, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ Nobody else has anything to say on this topic. I thought it was interesting.
I am sort of that way too. I lean right.. but tend to do each issue separately.jerrab » 29 May 2022, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ I am independent so I am not 100 per cent with either party.