Liberal Forum

walkingstick » 27 May 2022, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2022, 3:48 pm

due to inflation, there might be a 4% a month social security increase.. a person getting $1k a month from s.s. would get $40 a month more. while a person who gets $2k a month from s.s. would get $80 a month more. both need an increase. what would be fare, dollar increase, not percentage increase. so. give both $60 a month increase. problem. biden cannot do simple math.

Social Security needs a negative increase.  To $0.  There is no more money to pay social security.  The program needs to be terminated immediately.  Old people voted for it.  Old people let their legislators raid it and take all of the money out of the fund.  So, screw 'em.  Cancel Social Security, and DO IT NOW!!!
 

ConsRule » 27 May 2022, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2022, 3:53 pm

Talk about a Freudian slip!  Yea, we would be paying for it.  The correct word is "fair".  Moving on...who said life would be fair?

Wrong month, to boot. The fair is in October, 


But I'm game for a raise - why not? Gotta do SOMETHING while Rome burns - and daddy needs a new fiddle.

GHETTOBLASTER » 28 May 2022, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑

28 May 2022, 6:37 pm

That's OK.
Thanks to my UNION PENSION AS A MILLWRIGHT before millions of ILLEGAL ALIENS were imported by the NWO GLOBALISTS into my society  to destroy the labor unions and do great harm to the skilled labor sector of our  middle class...I LIVE LIKE A KING...  
Millions of MIDDLE CLASS / SKILLED LABOR US CITIZENS  [like me]used to be  able to "live like kings" on substantial land post retirement....and not live like sardines in some SOVIET UNION STYLE RETIREMENT COMMUNE LIKE CHAZ....where all the poor LIBTARDS GO TO SPEND THEIR FINAL DAYS IN THEIR TILT UP CONCRETE SLAB LIVING QUARTERS             
If you want to thank the people who  allowed today's sad state of affairs happen [for fear of speaking out against it]...thank THE GLOBALIST BRAINWASHED  "UNION RANK AND FILE LIBERALS"  WHO WERE TOO SHEEPISH TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE OBVIOUS.

I used to love you guys. I worked piece work, so the millwright was cash money to me. 

Skans » 02 Jun 2022, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jun 2022, 1:24 pm

Social Security needs a negative increase.  To $0.  There is no more money to pay social security.  The program needs to be terminated immediately.  Old people voted for it.  Old people let their legislators raid it and take all of the money out of the fund.  So, screw 'em.  Cancel Social Security, and DO IT NOW!!!

The money for SS is in treasury bonds.

If I suggested defaulting on WALL STREET'S treasury bonds, you would screech like the bitch your mama raised and accuse me of being a "commie."

You are a suck *** midwit who cannot judge an idea until "authority" tells him what to think. 
 

Cannonpointer » 02 Jun 2022, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jun 2022, 1:44 pm

I used to love you guys. I worked piece work, so the millwright was cash money to me.

I think I was drawn to the trade because Mom would never allow me to have an ERECTOR SET...!!!  

 The GILBERT Toy Co. had some pretty advanced toys for little boys....this engine was the largest that was ever mass marketed for boys....
VINTAGE GILBERT 11 MODEL AIRPLANE CL FF ENGINE W/DUAL EXHAUST .11 NITRO GLOW | #511262573 (worthpoint.com)
Many a boy bloodied his fingers, but sucked it up and kept on flipping the prop until his pride and joy came to life.....  
 
 

supraTruth » 27 May 2022, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2022, 9:26 pm

ONLY U SICK SON OF A BITCH RNC PISS ANTS FOR THE GUN MANUFACTURERS ENSURE THAT ANY  PUNK WITH A MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEM CAN GET HIGH CALIBER LONG GUNS WITH HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES 

 
 

freeman » 28 May 2022, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

28 May 2022, 8:47 am

It was done fairly. This might not be exact and is circumstance dependent, but the person receiving $80 per month generally paid twice as much into the system as the person receiving $40 per month. What a person receives is based on what they contributed.
What you proposed is akin to a communist style redistribution.

Social security payments are not based on the total paid into the system. They are based on the income of the LAST TEN QUARTERS before retirement. Most people earn more during the final years of their careers, but there are many that do not,  Real estate agents, pro athletes, perhaps actors and actresses.

 Do you know how pensions are determined in Communist countries? I strongly suspect you have no clue. But if you do, tell us.

DeezerShoove » 27 May 2022, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2022, 9:28 pm

I don't care. Because you say the same **** repeatedly.

Prog ****... the stinkiest **** there is.

THE ALL ENCOMPASSING TRUTH IS DIFFICULT TO AVOID

 

GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Jun 2022, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jun 2022, 1:55 pm

I think I was drawn to the trade because Mom would never allow me to have an ERECTOR SET...!!!  

 The GILBERT Toy Co. had some pretty advanced toys for little boys....this engine was the largest that was ever mass marketed for boys....
VINTAGE GILBERT 11 MODEL AIRPLANE CL FF ENGINE W/DUAL EXHAUST .11 NITRO GLOW | #511262573 (worthpoint.com)
Many a boy bloodied his fingers, but sucked it up and kept on flipping the prop until his pride and joy came to life.....

My parents refused to buy me a meth lab. 

Xavier_Onassis » 02 Jun 2022, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jun 2022, 3:35 pm

Social security payments are not based on the total paid into the system. They are based on the income of the LAST TEN QUARTERS before retirement. Most people earn more during the final years of their careers, but there are many that do not,  Real estate agents, pro athletes, perhaps actors and actresses.

 Do you know how pensions are determined in Communist countries? I strongly suspect you have no clue. But if you do, tell us.

Thanks for the info. So you're suggesting that if a person worked as an executive pulling down income into 6 digits for 30 years, but then lost their job at 60 years old and took a job as a Walmart greeter, then their social security payments would be based on the minimum wage they were paid in the 2-1/2 years prior to retirement regardless of the average they paid in over the prior 30 years?
 

Xavier_Onassis » 02 Jun 2022, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jun 2022, 3:35 pm

Social security payments are not based on the total paid into the system. They are based on the income of the LAST TEN QUARTERS before retirement. Most people earn more during the final years of their careers, but there are many that do not,  Real estate agents, pro athletes, perhaps actors and actresses.

 Do you know how pensions are determined in Communist countries? I strongly suspect you have no clue. But if you do, tell us.

That sounded so unfair and arbitrary I decided I had better look it up rather than depend on a forum member that is generally recognized as being full of sh*te.

https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/COLA/Benefits.html
"Social Security benefits are typically computed using "average indexed monthly earnings." This average summarizes up to 35 years of a worker's indexed earnings. We apply a formula to this average to compute the primary insurance amount (PIA). The PIA is the basis for the benefits that are paid to an individual."

"Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME)
When we compute an insured worker's benefit, we first adjust or "index" his or her earnings to reflect the change in general wage levels that occurred during the worker's years of employment. Such indexation ensures that a worker's future benefits reflect the general rise in the standard of living that occurred during his or her working lifetime.

Up to 35 years of earnings are needed to compute average indexed monthly earnings. After we determine the number of years, we choose those years with the highest indexed earnings, sum such indexed earnings, and divide the total amount by the total number of months in those years. We then round the resulting average amount down to the next lower dollar amount. The result is the AIME."
 
 

supraTruth » 02 Jun 2022, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jun 2022, 12:54 pm

NO, *******, THEY WERE PURCHASED UNDER A RED STATE REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION.  THOSE ARE THE FACTS.

Weapons are regulated at the federal level, as your meme suggests. Although a well regulated militia isn't the constitutional right, the right to bear arms is. Weapons don't kill children, the mentally ill do, a weapon is nothing more than a inanimate tool. Incontinent Biden and his retarded AG failed those children during the FEDERAL background check, someone with a known history of threatening to shoot up a school should never have been allowed to purchase a weapon. Your team screwed the pooch. Facts are facts.
 

Cedar » 03 Jun 2022, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 10:22 am

Weapons are regulated at the federal level, as your meme suggests. Although a well regulated militia isn't the constitutional right, the right to bear arms is. Weapons don't kill children, the mentally ill do, a weapon is nothing more than a inanimate tool. Incontinent Biden and his retarded AG failed those children during the FEDERAL background check, someone with a known history of threatening to shoot up a school should never have been allowed to purchase a weapon. Your team screwed the pooch. Facts are facts.

IT IS REPUBLICANS THAT OPPOSE & WEAKEN BACKGROUND CHECKS, & IT IS REPUBLICANS THAT BLOCK ANY ATTEMPTS TO BAN ASSAULT RIFLES MURDERING CHILDREN, & U ******* RNC **** SUPPORT TEXAS LOOSE GUN LAWS.

 
 

supraTruth » 03 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm

IT IS REPUBLICANS THAT OPPOSE & WEAKEN BACKGROUND CHECKS, & IT IS REPUBLICANS THAT BLOCK ANY ATTEMPTS TO BAN ASSAULT RIFLES MURDERING CHILDREN, & U ******* RNC **** SUPPORT TEXAS LOOSE GUN LAWS.

Even if true that wouldn’t change the fact that Joe Biden and his DOJ allowed the Texas shooter to purchase the weapons that killed those children.
 
 

Cedar » 04 Jun 2022, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2022, 6:36 pm

Even if true that wouldn’t change the fact that Joe Biden and his DOJ allowed the Texas shooter to purchase the weapons that killed those children.

NO, U ******* TRUMPER SCUM, THE POSTS OF JUVENILES ARE SEALED WHEN TURNING 18 & CANNOT BE USED IN BACKGROUND CHECKS!  THAT IS NOT THE FAULT OF PRESIDENT BIDEN OR THE DOJ.

JEEZE, U TRUMPER SCUM ARE ALL SO **** STOOOPID!
 

supraTruth » 08 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm

NO, U ******* TRUMPER SCUM, THE POSTS OF JUVENILES ARE SEALED WHEN TURING 18 & CANNOT BE USED IN BACKGROUND CHECKS!  THAT IS NOT THE FAULT OF PRESIDENT BIDEN OR THE DOJ.

JEEZE, U TRUMPER SCUM ARE ALL SO **** STOOOPID!

Nothing is sealed from the FBI, stupid.
 

Cedar » 08 Jun 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 2:21 pm

Nothing is sealed from the FBI, stupid.

Then why the failure?  Just saying it is Biden's fault isn't the truth.

Do demdopes know that there are House and Senate dems who are against ramming new gun laws through? The ONLY new laws that will be enacted are laws with bi-partisan support. House dem members who vote for these proposals may lose their seats in the coming dem election debacle. Please give the definition of an assault rifle so we will know what you THINK it is. My definition would be what the Army gave me when i was 20 years old in Vietnam. M-16 rifle. Fully automatic, detachable magazine. Anything other than that description is an ordinary rifle. Please describe.

supraTruth » 03 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm

IT IS REPUBLICANS THAT OPPOSE & WEAKEN BACKGROUND CHECKS, & IT IS REPUBLICANS THAT BLOCK ANY ATTEMPTS TO BAN ASSAULT RIFLES MURDERING CHILDREN, & U ******* RNC **** SUPPORT TEXAS LOOSE GUN LAWS.

 

johndnorth » 08 Jun 2022, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 2:34 pm

Do demdopes know that there are House and Senate dems who are against ramming new gun laws through? The ONLY new laws that will be enacted are laws with bi-partisan support. House dem members who vote for these proposals may lose their seats in the coming dem election debacle. Please give the definition of an assault rifle so we will know what you THINK it is. My definition would be what the Army gave me when i was 20 years old in Vietnam. M-16 rifle. Fully automatic, detachable magazine. Anything other than that description is an ordinary rifle. Please describe.

An AR-15 DECAPITATED CHILDREN IN UVALDE, SO GO **** YOURSELF SOME MORE WITH YOUR SILLY DEFINITION, U **** ******* PIECE OF ****!