Vegas » 05 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
Even after I kick your *** on the Potus 2008, your desperate *** has to still use it.
How **** desperate do you get? Seriously.
Depp Vs Heard? Mt God you are so **** desperate.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
describe how that happened..Even after I kick your *** on the Potus 2008, your desperate *** has to still use it.
And yet here you are, appropriating my work.
Those are the numbers.Vegas » 05 Jun 2022, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Just as I predicted, "argue the numbers" is similar to "prove the lie."
God you are so easy.
Prove your claim. NOW!! Now mother ****. Prove it!
Read mine.
who on earth is this stupid?
You. The only time your education counted was in your initial job interview as an intern. Since the your performance counted. No one cares about your education.
That *** is mommy-raised: an over-mothered sissy boy who still thinks everything should be "fair."Vegas » 05 Jun 2022, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Only applies to you since you make a habit of it, I don't.
And again, how many **** times does that need to be repeated to you?
Stupid asshole.
Your link leds to politics - not science. And you are too stupid to know that.ScottMon » 05 Jun 2022, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Science says the following...
Science tells us that gender is certainly not binary; it may not even be a linear spectrum. Like many other facets of identity, it can operate on a broad range of levels and operate outside of many definitions. And it also appears that gender may not be as static as we assume.
Between the (Gender) Lines: the Science of Transgender Identity - Science in the News (harvard.edu)
No questions, dick sucker.
Blackvegetable » 05 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑Vegas » 05 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
Even after I kick your *** on the Potus 2008, your desperate *** has to still use it.
How **** desperate do you get? Seriously.
Depp Vs Heard? Mt God you are so **** desperate.![]()
![]()
![]()
describe how that happened..Even after I kick your *** on the Potus 2008, your desperate *** has to still use it.
Huey » 05 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑And yet here you are, appropriating my work.
Blackvegetable » 05 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑Those are the numbers.Vegas » 05 Jun 2022, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Just as I predicted, "argue the numbers" is similar to "prove the lie."
God you are so easy.
Prove your claim. NOW!! Now mother ****. Prove it!
Are they "good" or "bad"?
Blackvegetable » 05 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑#readyoursig
https://youtu.be/rLuqzSLZ2EABlackvegetable » 05 Jun 2022, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑who on earth is this stupid?
Dick sucker.
Blackvegetable » 05 Jun 2022, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a slack jawed cretin.
At the recent U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sen. Marsha Blackburn triggered controversy when she asked Jackson to define the word “woman.” After Jackson declined, several Republican congresspeople chimed in with definitions for “woman” that ranged from dubious to shocking, including “the weaker sex,” “someone who has a uterus,” and “X chromosomes, no tallywhacker.”
Such notions haven’t evolved much since 1871, when naturalist Charles Darwin told the world that “man is more courageous, pugnacious, and energetic than women, and has more inventive genius.” Most 19th- and 20th-century evolutionary theories (and theorists) asserted that evolution created two kinds of creatures—male and female—and individuals’ behavior and nature reflected this biological binary.
Today a chorus of scientific-sounding claims about “blue and pink” brains, testosterone, and male primate aggression are offered up as natural explanations for masculine and feminine behavior, along with gaps in pay, jobs, political and economic leadership, and sexuality. In the political and legal realms, the belief that biology creates two types of humans is invoked in a range of attempts to mandate and enforce how humans should behave.
These assertions and beliefs are wrong.
https://www.sapiens.org/biology/biologi ... -humanity/
You're a half-a-queer cuck who prefers dithering.Xavier_Onassis » 05 Jun 2022, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑
And no, I am a heterosexual male who prefers women.
Blackvegetable » 05 Jun 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ With what part of Non-Binary are you struggling, other than the "non" and the "binary"?
Already posted it.
Twice.
Woman - Noun.
It is not a term of Science.
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 05 Jun 2022, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑
4 are questions.
there are a total of 21 questions in the 20 OPs.