Well . . . @Blackvegetable ain't a biologist, you know !Huey » 05 Jun 2022, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ You need to bow out now. Any one unable to provide the definition of “women” is not intellectually capable of participating.
No "question" , asshole !
A woman is a "female"?SJConspirator » 05 Jun 2022, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ woman = female member of the human species.
Its very simple, despite your efforts to complicate it
Those who can't, yap.JinnMartini » 06 Jun 2022, 5:07 am » wrote: ↑ The only reason I can fathom why this huge asshole BlackVegetable is not being IGNORED by everyone is . . . it's fun to humiliate him and make him eat **** every **** day !
"Woman" ain't biology.JinnMartini » 06 Jun 2022, 4:44 am » wrote: ↑ Well . . . @Blackvegetable ain't a biologist, you know !
A woman is a goat . . . at least . . . to muslimes !Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2022, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ A woman is a "female"?
Damn, that's **** deep.
And tautological.
You people are **** sheep.
More forage, Dolly?
More deflection, *** ?
binary compounding interest rule of 72 covers inverse proportions between inorganic and ancestral results changing forms and shapes without creating or destroying the universe perpetually balancing between expanding details never same contracting results again all done using same periodic table of contents to both inorganic universal positions and ancestral displacements native to one specific atmosphere.Blackvegetable » 05 Jun 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ With what part of Non-Binary are you struggling, other than the "non" and the "binary"?
Already posted it.
Twice.
Woman - Noun.
It is not a term of Science.
Moving on to the next 20 threads we count as follows
Well...no. But your question confirms that you're a **** who doesn't understand the difference between sex and gender. The "B" is for bisexual. It identifies those who's orientation is sexual attraction to either sex. It implies that there are two sexes. There are primarily two sexes, although there are rare instances where a child is born with dual sexuality, people born with reproductive or sexual anatomy of both sexes. So...there are babies born with male sexual anatomy...there are babies born with female sexual anatomy, and those born with both...a third sexual description that is often referred to as "intersex".
So.... 2.5 sexes. It's progressives that conflate sex and gender. Transsexuals mutilate themselves to approximate the opposite sex, not a nebulous gender identity. They demand to be recognized as a different sex, not a different gender expression.IkeBana » 06 Jun 2022, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ Well...no. But your question confirms that you're a **** who doesn't understand the difference between sex and gender. The "B" is for bisexual. It identifies those who's orientation is sexual attraction to either sex. It implies that there are two sexes. There are primarily two sexes, although there are rare instances where a child is born with dual sexuality, people born with reproductive or sexual anatomy of both sexes. So...there are babies born with male sexual anatomy...there are babies born with female sexual anatomy, and those born with both...a third sexual description that is often referred to as "intersex". Gender is something else.
ha ha ha ha.Jinn Martini » 06 Jun 2022, 4:44 am » wrote: ↑ Well . . . @Blackvegetable ain't a biologist, you know !
They don't understand the difference between sex and gender. Sex is biological. Gender is not. Granted there are biological conditions, about a dozen different conditions, that blur the line between male and female. They’re known as disorders of sexual development or DSDs. But they are biological disorders. Gender is not biological. But these **** turn everything into a political argument, loaded with judgement and bigotry. So this **** from them is to be expected. What they would like to do is make any gender identification outside of male/femal into a mental health disorder. It's their politics and their bigotry. It's ****, hateful, despicable ****, but we're used to it at this point.Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2022, 5:19 am » wrote: ↑"Woman" ain't biology.JinnMartini » 06 Jun 2022, 4:44 am » wrote: ↑ Well . . . @Blackvegetable ain't a biologist, you know !
If you have to ask, the problem ISN'T the party occupying the WH.IkeBana » 06 Jun 2022, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ They don't understand the difference between sex and gender. Sex is biological. Gender is not. Granted there are biological conditions, about a dozen different conditions, that blur the line between male and female. They’re known as disorders of sexual development or DSDs. But they are biological disorders. Gender is not biological. But these **** turn everything into a political argument, loaded with judgement and bigotry. So this **** from them is to be expected.
incomplete one sided truth omitting 7 other sides than your boxed in opinion.Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2022, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ If you have to ask, the problem ISN'T the party occupying the WH.
If you can get pregnant . . . you're a woman !
really narrow scope/spectrum that comes from living a vernacular tribalistic mentality.Jinn Martini » 06 Jun 2022, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ If you can get pregnant . . . you're a woman !
Barred health conditions.
If you can't . . . you're either a man or a pervert who deserves an atrocious death !
As easy as that !