1. what I wanted to convey was of the existence of a boundary between supporting someone, and worshiping someone.omh » 11 Jun 2022, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ 1.words are means of communicating ideas between ancestors living in series parallel time occupying space here where ever here is for each ancestor alive geographically occupying space as one of a kind. symbolism over substance, context governs content, with possibilities being static ideas used historically to convince reproductions life isn't kinetically self evident as a whole species here now.
2.so you get on the kinetic level of perpetual balancing yet or are you still thinking outside a box following some narrative about God and country tis of thee?.
3.I voted for trump twice and since he is a lesser of evils to pick from I would should he run again. Do I support him, hell no. But I don't support his opposition either. I am trapped between all system os denying life in plain sight and any side I would pick would hold me on charges of insubordination, treason, blasphemy.
4.I am an honest reproductive sole no character defending their soul beliefs wants me around even my wife has a love hate relationship with me. My son picks my wife's role playing a character in reality, my daughter uses my understanding of life to her advantage and moves around never noticed by anyone.
the invisible silent majority everywhere in plain sight.
ha ha ha hajefftec » 11 Jun 2022, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. what I wanted to convey was of the existence of a boundary between supporting someone, and worshiping someone.
2.The latter, there is something about a country based on biblical principles that worked. .....that's just me...
3. The side that is freedom-loving wouldn't hold you on charges of insubordination, treason, nor blasphemy......you're intelligent....you know what side that is....c'mon...
4. Might be mistaken but, it sounds like the typical family to me.... :)
Ukraine is the most corrupt democracy in the west. The fact the Bidens personally made tens of millions feeding off their corrupted carcass is evidence of that. Trump would have assured Russia that nato membership was off the table, thus averting this pointless war. End of the day Ukraine will not join nato. Millions may starve but hey, we stood on principle damnit. Ready to fight to the last Ukrainian.IkeBana » 11 Jun 2022, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course that's what Trump would have done. He's in hock to the Russians up to his nostrils. The Russians signed on to the 1991 Ukrainian Independence Referendum...giving full and complete autonomy to Ukraine. Big surprise that we can't trust Putin to honor a deal any more than we can trust Trump to honor a deal.
It's none of Putin's **** business if Ukraine wants to join the EU or NATO.
Don't blame anyone else for what you said.
Three paragraphs of whataboutism from the dopey prince of WHATABOUT THE **** CLINTONS!!!Buffalo » 11 Jun 2022, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ You got any proof of Trump being in hock to Russia. How about the many titted empress selling 20% of US uranium to them. Or slick willie getting paid $500,000 to give a 30 minute speech in Russia? What did he talk about? How to get your dick sucked by young interns?
YOU, bananabrain, are a goddamn LIAR!!!
How would the US react if Russia provided Mexico weapons?
How about Cuba and/or Venezuela?
What would the US do if Russia Put nukes right at our backdoor?
Evidence: Russia Planning to Deploy Nukes to Cuba and VenezuelaBy
VT Editors
-
January 10, 2022
"According to data from open monitoring resources, yesterday and today in the airspace of Venezuela and Cuba, a Russian Tu-154M aircraft was seen, most likely belonging to the FSB of Russia. Who exactly may be on board the special flight and for what purpose the visits to these countries were made is unknown, however, experts believe that the Russian side may well negotiate precisely on the creation of Russian military bases and facilities in Venezuela and Cuba, as well as, in the future , and missile weapons. On the other hand, experts draw attention to the fact that other departments should be overwhelmed by the solution of such problems.
Earlier, the Russian side announced that it is ready to give the United States and NATO a very tough response if, during negotiations on providing security guarantees to Russia, the United States and NATO representatives refuse to comply with the requirements. It is likely that it is the deployment of Russian missile weapons near the US borders that could force Washington to seriously attend to such an issue."
GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Scottmon has had the facts pointed out many times about this.
The Democrats turned down extra security because they wanted as much death and destruction as they could possibly get.
Why else would they continue to lie about all the death and injury after it was over...?
Why was death and destruction inevitable on that day?The Democrats turned down extra security because they wanted as much death and destruction as they could possibly get.
Because we had 18 months of left wing violence preceding it. Trump offered 20k national guard, congressional leadership said no thank you.Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Why was death and destruction inevitable on that day?
But only 3.7% of the incidents involved violence.Neo » 11 Jun 2022, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Because we had 18 months of left wing violence preceding it. Trump offered 20k national guard, congressional leadership said no thank you.
Less than 3.7% in D.C. on Jan 6 were involved in any violence.
Goofball, please.golfboy » 11 Jun 2022, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Less than 3.7% in D.C. on Jan 6 were involved in any violence.
Statistics. 587 separate RIOTS. Thousands of injured cops. 27 dead. Sure only 4% of blm rallies featured violence but there were thousands of them. 4% led to nearly 600 riots.
Yak, yak...Neo » 11 Jun 2022, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Statistics. 587 separate RIOTS. Thousands of injured cops. 27 dead. Sure only 4% of blm rallies featured violence but there were thousands of them. 4% led to nearly 600 riots.
What's wrong BV? Facts suck for you?
Far less. 60,000 at the stop the steal rally. 600 charged with crimes, most non violent. Even assuming every one of those charges were violent it would be 1 in a hundred, one percent.golfboy » 11 Jun 2022, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Less than 3.7% in D.C. on Jan 6 were involved in any violence.
Goofball,
It was one disceet event.Neo » 11 Jun 2022, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Far less. 60,000 at the stop the steal rally. 600 charged with crimes, most non violent. Even assuming every one of those charges were violent it would be 1 in a hundred, one percent.
That **** was planned but not in the way presented. Security was deliberately lowered and agent provocateurs incited the crowd. They were hoping for far more violence. They being the swamp and deepstate.Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ It was one disceet event.
It went off as Grifty planned it, except Pence survived.
So why are Grifty enthusiasts so susceptible to the Grift?Neo » 11 Jun 2022, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ That **** was planned but not in the way presented. Security was deliberately lowered and agent provocateurs incited the crowd. They were hoping for far more violence. They being the swamp and deepstate.
Because every day humans are involved with death and destruction somewhere in this atmosphere competing to own the future today, every day a rotation happens evolving here.Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Why was death and destruction inevitable on that day?
"except Pence survived"Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ It was one disceet event.
It went off as Grifty planned it, except Pence survived.