Liberal Forum

jefftec » 12 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm

....what evidence???   ....for the -love of pete- spit it out....yikes..

Did you watch the hearing yet?

Peepee-...he's a puppet trump-sucking monetary ignoramus like you...but at least he's not ignorant enough to call himself 'libertarian'... from what i call see from the thin orange  gruel you post here, you, puppet trump, 0mh, etcetercrats, are 'authoritardians'...[hint for republican-radio-level dumb@sses: that's the (((((((OPPOSITE)))))))) of honest 'libertarianism'...get real, trumptrolltard!  .... no honest libertarian would ever claim you blathering  trumptards as an ally... ((((((((WORD)))))))))    here you go-"he's a puppet trump-sucking monetary ignoramus like you".....you didn't bother to read his response. Can't believe that I'm engaging with a reprobate named Peepee, .....I'm like what the hell??? Dude you couldn't call yourself- Pepe- ohhh no,.....you had to give us the full brunt of your perv.....and with the zeal of a blithering idiot: " no honest libertarian would ever claim you blathering  trumptards as an ally... ((((((((WORD)))))))))    " ......Why, you're just an authority on what libertarians stand for, aren't you. There is just no way that I could support the positive results Trump made. OHHH NOOO.......must thank you for that amazing rendition of mental midgetry........   

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2022, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 12:36 pm

Did you watch the hearing yet?

it is all a replay of what took place so far. Just replaying circumstantial evidence, as proof positive of possibility it worked as charged but 90% of the information was left out.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2022, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 12:36 pm

Did you watch the hearing yet?

Yes, I suffered through it.  ....caught a micro-sleep interval, to tell you the truth.  It was full of opinions, no cross examination to speak of.
.....much like the kiddie lemonade stand event......playing court. Isn't that cute?...

ScottMon » 12 Jun 2022, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 11:19 am

Anyone who burned down buildings and caused deaths in a riot are also terrorists.

ASHLI BABBITT DID NEITHER!!!
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2022, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 12:36 pm

jefftec » 12 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm

....what evidence???   ....for the -love of pete- spit it out....yikes..

Did you watch the hearing yet?

 

The dog and pony **** show is nothing but anti-Trump LIES and PROPAGANDA!!!

Where the **** is your evidence?
 

Buffalo » 12 Jun 2022, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 1:10 pm

The dog and pony **** show is nothing but anti-Trump LIES and PROPAGANDA!!!

Where the **** is your evidence?

So I watch 2 hrs, including videos of the event, and video taped depositions.

You refuse, only to demand that I now recite what you refused to learn.

You're a **** idiot, Buffy.
 

jefftec » 12 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm

Yes, I suffered through it.  ....caught a micro-sleep interval, to tell you the truth.  It was full of opinions, no cross examination to speak of.
.....much like the kiddie lemonade stand event......playing court. Isn't that cute?...

What the **** is a "micro sleep interval"?

You either saw it or you didn't. 
 

Neo » 06 Jun 2022, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jun 2022, 6:36 am

Anyone think this is a good idea? We have enough division in this country, spending weeks focusing on a three hour **** show with the expressed intention of labeling the millions of supporters of Donald Trump neo fascists doesn't sound like the chemotherapy this nation needs to find its unity. It's shared culture, language, beliefs, and national identity.

I've discovered a new feature here...it's called avoid-troll-disinformation.  ake:  Scroll     

ScottMon » 12 Jun 2022, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 11:19 am

Anyone who burned down buildings and caused deaths in a riot are also terrorists.

Explain why Ashli Babbit was the only person  on the entire capitol campus with such an overstuffed back pack that has designed to provide protection for falling backwards...like a HOLLYWOOD STUNT MAN WOUL WEAR..?

Explain HOW SHE WAS BLOWN BACKWARDS BY A SINGLE GUN SHOT..? Those of us who passed HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS KNOW THAT A SMALL ARMS BULLET DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH KINETIC ENERGY TO DO THAT..! 
Explain the lack of blood
Explain why BLM ACTIVIST JOHN SULLIVAN just happened to be standing in just the perfect spot to video that scene..?
Explain why the Capitol Cop who shot her changed his aim away from her right at the moment he squeezed the trigger..?
I will help you answer that...because even blanks can injure at that range. 

Fantasy isn't really my genre, so I didn't watch the Hollywood production starring Liz Cheney as a republican and Adam Kissassinger as a man

It Was All a Set Up: Even NYT Admits Police Ordered to Stand Down on January 6th – Yet the DOJ and FBI Are Harassing and Indicting Innocent Americans Proving They are Corrupt

By Joe Hoft

Published April 16, 2021 at 8:23am

The Capitol Police on January 6th were given orders to stand down.

Pelosi refused Trump’s offer before that day for National Guard troops at the Capitol. Director Wray continues to lie and say there was no evidence of Antifa at the Capitol that day. Now the DOJ is indicting innocent Americans invited into the Capitol by the police? This is not right, it’s not justice and America knows it.

The New York Times reported this week what we already knew from videos of that day, that the Capitol police were told to stand down on January 6th.

We also know that Pelosi refused National Guard troops on January 6th after President Trump’s suggestion:

We also know that Director Wray lied and said there was no evidence of radical left groups like Antifa disguising themselves as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day:

Of course, Director Wray must have known that Antifa/BLM were there – they bragged about it online:

We also know that Trump supporters were invited into the Capitol by the police:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1346939609037615104
 


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/0 ... g-corrupt/

ScottMon » 12 Jun 2022, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 11:19 am

Anyone who burned down buildings and caused deaths in a riot are also terrorists.

You never even heard of those cases and if you claim you did..nobody will believe a pathological liar like you.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2022, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 1:14 pm

What the **** is a "micro sleep interval"?

You either saw it or you didn't.

"What the **** is a "micro sleep interval"?".....use you imagination.....  

What evidence did they present?.....I didn't see it......no wonder that they had no cross examination. They had drama, intrigue, and a chairman obviously with his own bias. ....
amatuerish....really....
 

jefftec » 12 Jun 2022, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:01 pm

"What the **** is a "micro sleep interval"?".....use you imagination.....  

What evidence did they present?.....I didn't see it......no wonder that they had no cross examination. They had drama, intrigue, and a chairman obviously with his own bias. ....
amatuerish....really....

What evidence did they present?.....I didn't see it.

Then you didn't watch it.

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2022, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:11 pm

Then you didn't watch it.

yes, i did watch it and it was like dramatic, kiddie skit that seemingly lasted forever.....happy now?

jefftec » 12 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm

yes, i did watch it and it was like dramatic, kiddie skit that seemingly lasted forever.....happy now?

Given that it was a dry recitation of facts, along with references to documentary evidence, video testimony and an entire perspective from inside that you'd never seen before, I think your characterization is revealing.

If you violently occupy the Capitol and interfere with the certification of an election, then you're engaged in insurrection.

Do you challenge that fact?

Buffalo » 12 Jun 2022, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 1:07 pm

ASHLI BABBITT DID NEITHER!!!

She did participate in an insurrection as a willing combatant.   She went in an area of conflict and she was a vet.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2022, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:20 pm

Given that it was a dry recitation of facts, along with references to documentary evidence, video testimony and an entire perspective from inside that you'd never seen before, I think your characterization is revealing.

If you violently occupy the Capitol and interfere with the certification of an election, then you're engaged in insurrection.

Do you challenge that fact?

"violently", you say?  as you have been told, as I am sure, by others as well on this site, that the protesters did not come with firearms. So, you can call it an insurrection but, in reality, you're just playing with yourself.

jefftec » 12 Jun 2022, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:56 pm

"violently", you say?  as you have been told, as I am sure, by others as well on this site, that the protesters did not come with firearms. So, you can call it an insurrection but, in reality, you're just playing with yourself.

https://www.statesman.com/story/news/po ... 963993002/

”PolitiFact reviewed the case files of approximately 430 defendants who were arrested and charged for their actions at the Capitol. We found several defendants who police say were found to have brought firearms with them. Some were charged with having firearms on Capitol grounds, while others stashed them away while in Washington“


https://www.npr.org/2021/03/19/97787958 ... -they-used